Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Shell Kinney

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007‎ | Vote

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nathan (talk | contribs) at 18:05, 3 December 2007 (→‎Oppose). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please Note: Extended comments may be moved to the talk page.

Shell Kinney

There are two main reasons that I would be an asset to the Arbcom. First is my commitment to the Foundation's projects and the community that supports them. Second is my experience with Wikipedia, dispute resolution and OTRS.
I've been an editor since June 05 (my account name was previously Jareth) and an Admin since November 05. I started working on the now defunct Wikipedia helpdesk email shortly before becoming an administrator - when this closed, I was invited to volunteer at OTRS. While some of the answers to OTRS emails are simple, many involve research to resolve and all require delicate handling of disputes and a solid knowledge of policy.
The ArbCom needs members who can stay active and nimble even under the weight of a rather thankless job. Thank you for this opportunity. Shell babelfish 18:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Daniel 00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rschen7754 (T C) 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --W.marsh 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bakaman 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kurykh 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. – Gurch (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SQLQuery me! 01:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. John254 03:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cryptic 03:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 03:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support. I am impressed by her dedication to the project. Pocopocopocopoco 03:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Elonka 04:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Spebi 06:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. JayHenry 07:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --MONGO 07:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Crockspot 08:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. ➔ REDVEЯS would like to show you some puppies 09:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Angela. 10:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Neil ☎ 12:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Don't see why not. Stifle (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Unqualified support. Excellent candidate. PeaceNT 14:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 15:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Dekimasuよ! 15:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Barely passing the threshold in convincing for a weak support. KTC 16:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. From my interaction way back in April, I will support every time. — Rudget contributions 17:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. More highly qualified candidates, sorry This is a Secret account 00:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. east.718 at 00:30, December 3, 2007
  3. Nufy8 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose. The candidate pushed with vigor for his fringe exclusionist interpretation of fairuse policy. This shows lack of concern for the encyclopedic content. The latter is a concern for holding the position of any influence in this project. --Irpen 00:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Temporary withdrawing my vote per this discussion per suspicion of name confusion. Would gladly issue a most sincere apology if I am mistaken. --Irpen 01:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strong oppose As per Irpen, we don't need any zealous layperson copyright enforcers on Arbcom, there are enough on wikipedia already. Travb (talk) 00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Per Travb.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Per Secret. --Coredesat 02:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Alexfusco5 02:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Too new. Zocky | picture popups 02:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Rebecca 02:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose -Dureo 03:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mercury 03:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Húsönd 03:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. WAS 4.250 09:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. A very weak oppose, plenty of more qualified candidates. Shem(talk) 10:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose, does not exhibit the appropriate leadership qualities. An arbitrator who refers to his fellow editors as "cretins" [1] is dubious at best. Mindraker 13:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Splash - tk 13:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Addhoc 14:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ral315 — (Voting) 17:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose AvruchTalk 18:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Vote/Shell_Kinney&oldid=175529026"