User talk:Seraphinamaitreyi

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

Hi, I notice that you're interested in Irreducible complexity and the question of the relationship of intelligent design to creationism. You'll find more information on the question in that ID article and in s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/2:Context: it's also worth reading the rest of the judgement, particularly s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/4:Whether ID Is Science.

As for the wording of the articles, we have to comply with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (WP:NPOV). The sections of the WP:NPOV that apply particularly to these articles are:

The contributors to the articles continually strive to adhere to these to the letter. .. dave souza, talk 21:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of iconic smokers

A tag has been placed on List of iconic smokers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 20:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On Semites and antisemitism

Regarding your comment at Talk:Islam and antisemitism, please see the third box at the top of that page. Thanks. -- Hi Ev 20:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice of mention at ArbComm

I have mentioned your username in evidence presented at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Matthew Hoffman/Evidence. Your contributions were mentioned to provide context prior to the central events of the case. GRBerry 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Eugenics

I've improved the Liberal eugenics article. Any comments? --Loremaster (talk) 02:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check the sources before tagging

I've removed your {dubious} tags ([1]) from the breast cancer article. Both statements were supported by footnotes from reputable, reliable sources (the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and Cancer Research UK).

I'm not even sure what you found dubious about the statements—breast cancer in men is rarer than in women, but still represents about 1% of all breast cancer cases. If you have specific concerns, please review the footnoted material and discuss your questions on the article talk page. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they do. Just look at the footnotes before you tag next time, m'kay? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't email me further until you look at the article footnotes. If you can't be bothered to read the linked articles, you can at least read the titles. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]