Talk:Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Reverted edits by 78.146.21.173 (talk) to last revision (162133322) by SineBot using m:WikiMonitor |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Evaluation methods == |
== Evaluation methods == |
||
NEWCASTLE ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE PREMIUR LEAGUE |
|||
Anyone who has a particular interest in research/evaluation methods and methodology, there is currently a huge duplication between the [[:Category:Research methods]] and [[:Category:Evaluation methods]]. Please see the discussion on [[Category_talk:Research methods]] and add your opinion. [[User:JenLouise|JenLouise]] 05:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
Anyone who has a particular interest in research/evaluation methods and methodology, there is currently a huge duplication between the [[:Category:Research methods]] and [[:Category:Evaluation methods]]. Please see the discussion on [[Category_talk:Research methods]] and add your opinion. [[User:JenLouise|JenLouise]] 05:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:15, 7 April 2008
Why does Reputation redirect to this page? They're not the same thing at all...
The External Links seem to be in no special order. If so, then perhaps they should be listed alphabetically? (Rick Davies)
I would like to see a sample or several samples of a course evaluation form so I can formulate one for my department. Can you help? Gloria Guerra gloria.guerra@cityofhouston.net
Evaluation methods
NEWCASTLE ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE PREMIUR LEAGUE Anyone who has a particular interest in research/evaluation methods and methodology, there is currently a huge duplication between the Category:Research methods and Category:Evaluation methods. Please see the discussion on Category_talk:Research methods and add your opinion. JenLouise 05:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Definition (first line of article)
The first line reads
- "Evaluation" is a systematic, continuous and comprehensive process of determining the growth and progress of the pupil towards objectives or values of the curriculum.
This is too narrow. Evaluation in education is perhaps the most obvious, but the broadest theoretical outlines treat it in relation to the "six Ps": "program, personnel, performance, policy, proposal, and product" [1]. I will therefore employ just the second paragraph as an adequate definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.236.18 (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)