New eugenics: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Liberal eugenics''' or '''new eugenics''' is the use of [[reproductive technology|reproductive]] and [[human genetic engineering|genetic]] technologies where the choice of the goals of [[human enhancement|enhancing distinctive human characteristics and abilities]] is left to individual preferences of [[consumer]]s rather than the [[Homogenization#Sociology and history|homogenizing]] preferences of [[government authority]].<ref name="McGee 1997">{{cite book| author = McGee, Glenn| title = The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics| publisher = Rowman & Littlefield| year = 2000| id = ISBN 0-8476-8344-3}}</ref><ref name="Parens 2000">{{cite book| author = Parens, Erik| title = Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications| publisher = Georgetown University Press| year = 2000| id = ISBN 0-87840-780-4}}</ref><ref name="Buchanan 2000">{{cite book| author = Buchanan, Allen; Brock, Dan W.; Daniels, Norman; Wikler, Daniel| title = From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice| publisher = Cambridge University Press| year = 2000| id = ISBN 0-521-66977-4}}</ref><ref name="Stock 2002">{{cite book| author = [[Gregory Stock|Stock, Gregory]]| title = Redesigning Humans: Choosing our Genes, Changing our Future| publisher = Mariner Books| year = 2002| id = ISBN 0-618-34083-1}}</ref><ref name="Agar 2004">{{cite book|author = [[Nicholas Agar|Agar, Nicholas]]|title = Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement|year = 2004|id = ISBN 1-4051-2390-7}}</ref>
'''Liberal eugenics''' or '''new eugenics''' is the use of [[reproductive technology|reproductive]] and [[human genetic engineering|genetic]] technologies where the choice of the goals of [[human enhancement|enhancing distinctive human characteristics and abilities]] is left to individual preferences of [[consumer]]s rather than the [[collectivist]] preferences of [[government authority]].<ref name="McGee 1997">{{cite book| author = McGee, Glenn| title = The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics| publisher = Rowman & Littlefield| year = 2000| id = ISBN 0-8476-8344-3}}</ref><ref name="Parens 2000">{{cite book| author = Parens, Erik| title = Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications| publisher = Georgetown University Press| year = 2000| id = ISBN 0-87840-780-4}}</ref><ref name="Buchanan 2000">{{cite book| author = Buchanan, Allen; Brock, Dan W.; Daniels, Norman; Wikler, Daniel| title = From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice| publisher = Cambridge University Press| year = 2000| id = ISBN 0-521-66977-4}}</ref><ref name="Stock 2002">{{cite book| author = [[Gregory Stock|Stock, Gregory]]| title = Redesigning Humans: Choosing our Genes, Changing our Future| publisher = Mariner Books| year = 2002| id = ISBN 0-618-34083-1}}</ref><ref name="Agar 2004">{{cite book|author = [[Nicholas Agar|Agar, Nicholas]]|title = Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement|year = 2004|id = ISBN 1-4051-2390-7}}</ref>


The term does not necessarily indicate that its proponents are [[social liberalism|socially liberal]] in the modern sense or that they are non-[[racist]] and non-[[classist]]. Rather, it is used to differentiate it from the ''[[authoritarian]]'' [[eugenics]] programs of the first half of the 20th century, which were associated with coercive methods to decrease the frequency of certain human [[hereditary]] [[Trait (biological)|traits]] passed on to the next generation. The most controversial aspect of those programs was the use of "negative" eugenics laws which allowed government agencies to sterilize individuals alleged to have undesirable genes. Historically, eugenics is often broken into the categories of ''positive'' (encouraging [[reproduction]] in the designated "[[Fitness (biology)|fit]]") and ''negative'' (discouraging reproduction in the designated "unfit"). Many positive eugenics programs were advocated and pursued in early 20th-century eugenics programs, but the negative programs were responsible for the [[compulsory sterilization]] of hundreds of thousands of persons in many countries and states, and were contained in much of the rhetoric of [[Nazi eugenics|Nazi eugenic]] programs of [[racial hygiene]] and [[ethnic cleansing]].<ref name="Buchanan 2000"/>
The term does not necessarily indicate that its proponents are [[social liberalism|socially liberal]] in the modern sense or that they are non-[[racist]] and non-[[classist]]. Rather, it is used to differentiate it from the ''[[authoritarian]]'' [[eugenics]] programs of the first half of the 20th century, which were associated with coercive methods to decrease the frequency of certain human [[hereditary]] [[Trait (biological)|traits]] passed on to the next generation. The most controversial aspect of those programs was the use of "negative" eugenics laws which allowed government agencies to sterilize individuals alleged to have undesirable genes. Historically, eugenics is often broken into the categories of ''positive'' (encouraging [[reproduction]] in the designated "[[Fitness (biology)|fit]]") and ''negative'' (discouraging reproduction in the designated "unfit"). Many positive eugenics programs were advocated and pursued in early 20th-century eugenics programs, but the negative programs were responsible for the [[compulsory sterilization]] of hundreds of thousands of persons in many countries and states, and were contained in much of the rhetoric of [[Nazi eugenics|Nazi eugenic]] programs of [[racial hygiene]] and [[ethnic cleansing]].<ref name="Buchanan 2000"/>

Revision as of 17:56, 2 August 2008

Liberal eugenics or new eugenics is the use of reproductive and genetic technologies where the choice of the goals of enhancing distinctive human characteristics and abilities is left to individual preferences of consumers rather than the collectivist preferences of government authority.[1][2][3][4][5]

The term does not necessarily indicate that its proponents are socially liberal in the modern sense or that they are non-racist and non-classist. Rather, it is used to differentiate it from the authoritarian eugenics programs of the first half of the 20th century, which were associated with coercive methods to decrease the frequency of certain human hereditary traits passed on to the next generation. The most controversial aspect of those programs was the use of "negative" eugenics laws which allowed government agencies to sterilize individuals alleged to have undesirable genes. Historically, eugenics is often broken into the categories of positive (encouraging reproduction in the designated "fit") and negative (discouraging reproduction in the designated "unfit"). Many positive eugenics programs were advocated and pursued in early 20th-century eugenics programs, but the negative programs were responsible for the compulsory sterilization of hundreds of thousands of persons in many countries and states, and were contained in much of the rhetoric of Nazi eugenic programs of racial hygiene and ethnic cleansing.[3]

Liberal eugenics is conceived as being mostly "positive", relying more on genetic manipulation than on selective breeding charts to achieve its aims. It seeks to both minimize congenital disorder and enhance ability, traditional eugenic goals. It is intended to be under the control of the parents exercizing their procreative liberty while guided by the principle of procreative beneficence, though the substantial governmental and corporate infrastructure required for human genetic engineering may limit or steer their actual choices. Currently, genetic testing such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis, have been developed to allow for embryos carrying congenital disorders to be discarded.[3]

A key goal of liberal eugenics is to reduce the role of chance in reproduction. Bioethicist Joseph Fletcher laid the intellectual groundwork for liberal eugenics in 1974 when he described an alternative to "reproductive roulette".[6] His visions soon became a reality when effective human in vitro fertilisation became possible in 1978. Modern interest in liberal eugenics is believed to have increased ever since.

According to health care public policy analyst RJ Eskow, libertarian eugenics is the term that would more accurately describe the form of eugenics promoted by some propopents in light of their strong opposition to even the minimal state intervention in reprogenetics-related issues which would be typical of a liberal democratic society.[7]

References

  1. ^ McGee, Glenn (2000). The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-8476-8344-3.
  2. ^ Parens, Erik (2000). Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications. Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0-87840-780-4.
  3. ^ a b c Buchanan, Allen; Brock, Dan W.; Daniels, Norman; Wikler, Daniel (2000). From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-66977-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Stock, Gregory (2002). Redesigning Humans: Choosing our Genes, Changing our Future. Mariner Books. ISBN 0-618-34083-1.
  5. ^ Agar, Nicholas (2004). Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. ISBN 1-4051-2390-7.
  6. ^ Fletcher, Joseph (1974). The Ethics of Genetic Control: Ending Reproductive Roulette. Doubleday. ISBN 0385082576.
  7. ^ Eskow, RJ (2007). "Homo Futurus: How Radically Should We Remake Ourselves - Or Our Children?". Retrieved 2007-02-02. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_eugenics&oldid=229438764"