Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Chey
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carcharoth (talk | contribs) at 14:10, 12 October 2008 (add delrev template). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 October 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Google news search shows notability. Malinaccier (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Changed to delete. Google news items are passing mentions and consensus is against me. Malinaccier (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tim Chey
- Tim Chey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article on unremarkable film director, with COI issue. Two of his films have articles but are themselves of somewhat iffy notability (although they feature notable performers). Unreferenced except for movie reviews and none of those meet WP:RS. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. There's an amount of articles on the web that mention Tim Chey but I can't find anything that is solely or largely about him. I'd be willing to change to keep if somebody digs up an article with substantial info to build an article on. Bill (talk|contribs) 19:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —miniluv (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete subject may be notable enough in the future after enough reliable sources appear, but current Google News search brings up nothing. Jeremiah (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. That search only covers the last month. You need to click on "all dates" to get complete results [1].
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Two of the sources originally in the article seem to meet WP:RS (Christianity Today and Christian Spotlight) and the Google News search that I linked above uncovers substantial coverage in The Sacramento Bee [2], The Atlanta Journal-Constitution [3] and La Crónica de Hoy [4] along with passing coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Village Voice etc. I think there's plenty there to show notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.