User talk:HabsMTL

Welcome!

Hello, HabsMTL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --El on ka 00:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I've been unable to find any verifiable sources for latest addition to the Days cast list. Have you read anything other than www.soaps.com about Melanie? Thanks. Rm994 (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie

No idea, dude. Soaps.com is the only one reporting her coming. I don't even know who the actress is. There are lots of comings and goings at Soapoperafan.com, but it is obviously also a fan site. I wish they would put all those one day guest appearances on Soapoperadigest.com! Later. Rm994 (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, she is Max Brady's half-sister. Still no verifiable sources are reporting her arrival, although at this point it seems a sure thing. Rm994 (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Roberts

I know that Lucas has changed his name on the show to Horton, but per WP:COMMONNAMES, he must still be referred to as Lucas Roberts. I think it should be Horton too, but we must follow the rules. Thank you for understanding. Hope you are well. Rm994 (talk) 20:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was probably someone new. I didn't recognize the IP, so I left them a nice message on their page. I really do think it should be Horton too, but the argument is that it was Roberts from 1993-2007, and that is how most people refer to the character. It's just like when everyone was trying to change Sami Brady to Sami Roberts, or Sami DiMera. Most people know the character as Sami Brady, therefore it must remain that way. Same as Lucas, I guess. And hey, I see that you've been fussed at about edit warring...let me know if I can help you with anything. Rm994 (talk) 02:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Sydal

Per WP:COMMONNAME, the article's name should be Matt Sydal. In addition, a consensus is normally to be established at WP:PW before one such article is moved. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway, as you did to Matt Sydal. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Please quit moving without consensus 13 62^talk 03:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like Gavyn said go to WP:PW look for article name changes. Go there and make a request and then the project will decide on it 13 62^talk 03:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tell you the answer to your question on 1362's page. It all depends on what the decision is. If the consensus is to not change it then it will not be change and you'll have to deal with that. If it is to change then it will be changed, without question.--WillC 03:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for engaging in a move war on Matt Sydal. To contest this block place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 03:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HabsMTL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The page should be titled Matthew Korklan and not Matt Sydal!!!! :S

Decline reason:

There is no evidence you intend to stop edit warring. Being right does not allow you to violate policy. The block will remain. If you resume the edit war, you will be blocked again. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But it shouldn't per WP:COMMONNAME and current consensus. Three users have told you this. What's the problem? Why do think the page should be his real name in the first place? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, edit warring is inappropriate, move warring even more so. If you're unblocked, are you going to just keep moving the page, or will you use discussion pages to seek consensus? – Luna Santin (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by the unblock request he will just go right back to edit warring. Tiptoety ^talk 04:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Sydal

Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Article name changes. Go to the bottom. Hit edit on Atlas Dabone. And place the following

==[[Matt Sydal]]==

I would like to nominate [[Matt Sydal]] for a name change. From Matt Sydal to Matthew Korklan.~~~~

Underneath Atlas Dabone. That is how you do it.--WillC 07:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Lea

So what if Lilian Garcia doesn't say Burchill? She and Paul Burchill are storyline siblings anyway so I don't understand what all the fuss is about. Anyway, she's listed as Katie Lea Burchill on WWE's official website. http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/ Miztahrogers (talk) 04:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid obvious, redundant, and useless links

Please stop. What is it that you can't understand. Kayfabe and color commentator are already linked in the prior sub-section. No need to link every single occurence. Go to WP:OVERLINK for more information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miztahrogers (talk • contribs) 20:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours for edit warring on List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees over WP:OVERLINK issues. It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 04:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Habs,

Thanks for adding STL # 804 at Sainte-Dorothée (AMT). much obliged. Peter Horn 14:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See below: Peter Horn 20:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC) User talk:Peter Horn[reply]

Ile-Bigras

Hello,

Please don't rename the link on the STL page to Ile-Laval. The page for Ile-Bigras (AMT) will be created. All the other links are for the station pages, this one shouldn't link to the geographic area.

Alex@MTRL (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ile-Bigras (2)

The page for Île-Bigras (AMT) has been created. Please do not modify the Société de transport de Laval page in favor of Îles Laval.

Alex@MTRL (talk) 05:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Hollingsworth

I think you're familiar enough with things now that you know how to do it. I've seen some of your contributions to the page, things I would have done myself. Keep up the good work....I've been in a tuss with some new editors lately. See ya :) Rm994 (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and thanks for the support...I think he/she is just new and doesn't understand the rules yet. I would just like to help them out if I can :) Rm994 (talk) 16:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's gotten REALLY out of hand...sort of discourages me from editing on here. Have you been following? It was never anything personal with that new editor...I was just trying to explain the rules. I was really hoping he would be like you, and calmly familiarize himself with the rules of this site, and then we could have yet another person have our backs with soaps...but it didn't turn out that way. :( Rm994 (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words. I just hated to see things escalate to name calling...but as long as we remain civil and do our best to make this site right, then we should feel good about the work we have done. Later :) Rm994 (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phenonmenon8980

While I appreciate your concern, I must remind you that we must remain civil on this site, including any emails sent to users. I have no personal gripe with Phenonmenon8980, I just wanted to explain the rules to him. I'd hate to see you blocked for disruptive behavior, as you are a valuable asset to this site! I really do appreciate your concern, but we must behave appropriately. To engage in hot debates would only further the cause the editors are "picking" on Phenom. Thank you :) Enjoy your day. Rm994 (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My whereabouts

I live in Chomedey off Notre-Dame about half way between Curé-Labelle and Bd. Chomedey. I'm listed in the local Bell directory. Peter Horn 20:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For future replies please use User talk:Peter Horn Peter Horn 20:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

FYI, an anon contacted me with concerns about an alleged email you sent to Phenomenon8980... Any truth to this? See top thread on my talkpage for details. --El on ka 16:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phenomenon8980

Hey there ... Phenomenon8980 is claiming (through IP 131.247.244.190) here that you sent the email posted there. If so, you need to know that the threatening tone and foul language is completely inappropriate. I know you are "friends" with Rm994 and Phenomenon8980's actions have been inappropriate as well, but back-and-forth threats are never the way to solve any conflict. I personally reported many of Phenom's actions which have led to three different blocks, but I am now defending him in this instance because you are violating the same rules. Further, the conflict with Rm994 seems to have been over for a few days now, and it is not necessary to revive it. In the future, consider a friendly message to an offending user pointing out possible aggressive or inappropriate behavior, and then a possible friendly warning is necessary. Follow that up with reports through proper channels if necessary. But we must always act civilly, and editors responding in an uncivil manner will ending up getting blocked on their own. Thanks. — TAnthony^Talk 16:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]