User talk:Prester John: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:29, 10 February 2008

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Prester_John.

File:Usa.gif

Welcome to "Talk to the Hand".

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply).
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Collapse of the World Trade Center

I stand corrected on the reference. However I will certainly search it out and see if I can indeed find a verifiable source for what the user was trying to say - I'm assuming good faith that he or she simply forgot the url of the website they were referencing. --Capitana (talk) 16:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of reading through your contribs after I resolved the dispute on Collapse of the World Trade Center. I didn't at all like what I saw. I would request that you don't use WP:MOSISLAM as a tool to be unpleasant towards other editors. If something is a violation of policy a neutral editor will normally remove it. You on the other hand have an agenda and 99.9% of your edits have been to articles about Muslims or Islam. Do you have a reason to dislike Muslims at all sir? --Capitana (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STALK

Please mind WP:STALK. Here your first edit on the article "Secular state" was a revert of my edit. (Needless to say your edit was promptly reverted by a third party) Such behavior violates WP:STALK. If you continue this, I'll have no choice but to report you. Have a good day.Bless sins (talk) 07:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 I stand corrected on the reference. However I will certainly search it out and see if I can indeed find a verifiable source for what the user was trying to say - I'm assuming good faith that he or she simply forgot the url of the website they were referencing. --[[User:Capitana|Capitana]] ([[User talk:Capitana|talk]]) 16:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 :I took the liberty of reading through your contribs after I resolved the dispute on Collapse of the World Trade Center. I didn't at all like what I saw. I would request that you don't use [[WP:MOSISLAM]] as a tool to be unpleasant towards other editors. If something is a violation of policy a neutral editor will normally remove it. You on the other hand have an agenda and 99.9% of your edits have been to articles about Muslims or Islam. Do you have a reason to dislike Muslims at all sir? --[[User:Capitana|Capitana]] ([[User talk:Capitana|talk]]) 17:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
+== WP:STALK ==
+Please mind WP:STALK. Here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Secular_state&diff=188747207&oldid=188644449 your first edit] on the article "[[Secular state]]" was a revert of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Secular_state&diff=188641948&oldid=188620822 my edit]. (Needless to say your edit was promptly reverted by a third party) Such behavior violates WP:STALK. If you continue this, I'll have no choice but to report you. Have a good day.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 07:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)