Colebrooke–Cameron Commission: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Bot: Migrating 1 langlinks, now provided by Wikidata on d:Q4806478
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes / special characters in sortkey fixed using AWB (9427)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Colebrooke-Cameron Commission''' was a [[Royal Commission]] of Eastern Inquiry sent by the [[Colonial Office|British Colonial Office]] in 1829 to assess the administration of the island of [[Ceylon]] and to make recommendations for administrative, financial, economic, and judicial reform. The official name of the commission was '''Commission to Examine and Report upon the Present State of the Laws, Regulations and Usages in the Settlements of the Cape of Good Hope and the Island of Mauritius and Ceylon'''. The commission comprised [[W. M. G. Colebrooke]] and [[Charles Hay Cameron]]. The legal and economic proposals made by the commission in 1833 were innovative and radical.{{Says who|date=November 2010}} Many of the proposals were adopted. They signified for Ceylon the first manifestation of [[constitution|constitutional government]], the first steps toward modernizing the [[traditional economy|traditional economic system]], and the beginnings of a uniform system of justice, education, and civil administration.
The '''Colebrooke–Cameron Commission''' was a [[Royal Commission]] of Eastern Inquiry sent by the [[Colonial Office|British Colonial Office]] in 1829 to assess the administration of the island of [[Ceylon]] and to make recommendations for administrative, financial, economic, and judicial reform. The official name of the commission was '''Commission to Examine and Report upon the Present State of the Laws, Regulations and Usages in the Settlements of the Cape of Good Hope and the Island of Mauritius and Ceylon'''. The commission comprised [[W. M. G. Colebrooke]] and [[Charles Hay Cameron]]. The legal and economic proposals made by the commission in 1833 were innovative and radical.{{According to whom|date=November 2010}} Many of the proposals were adopted. They signified for Ceylon the first manifestation of [[constitution|constitutional government]], the first steps toward modernizing the [[traditional economy|traditional economic system]], and the beginnings of a uniform system of justice, education, and civil administration.


==Recommendations==
==Recommendations==
Line 28: Line 28:
{{Legislatures of modern Sri Lanka}}
{{Legislatures of modern Sri Lanka}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Colebrooke-Cameron Commission}}
[[Category:Sri Lankan commissions and inquiries]]
[[Category:Sri Lankan commissions and inquiries]]
[[Category:History of Sri Lanka]]
[[Category:History of Sri Lanka]]

Revision as of 09:43, 20 August 2013

The Colebrooke–Cameron Commission was a Royal Commission of Eastern Inquiry sent by the British Colonial Office in 1829 to assess the administration of the island of Ceylon and to make recommendations for administrative, financial, economic, and judicial reform. The official name of the commission was Commission to Examine and Report upon the Present State of the Laws, Regulations and Usages in the Settlements of the Cape of Good Hope and the Island of Mauritius and Ceylon. The commission comprised W. M. G. Colebrooke and Charles Hay Cameron. The legal and economic proposals made by the commission in 1833 were innovative and radical.[according to whom?] Many of the proposals were adopted. They signified for Ceylon the first manifestation of constitutional government, the first steps toward modernizing the traditional economic system, and the beginnings of a uniform system of justice, education, and civil administration.

Recommendations

  • Establishment of an Executive Council and Legislative Council [1]
  • The amalgamation of the Kandyan and Maritime provinces and their administration as a single unit of government by the Governor in Council.[2]
  • The admission of Ceylonese into the Ceylon Civil Service.
  • The abolition of 'rajakariya' – compulsory personal service in the Kandyan provinces.
  • A commission to manage education should be appointed
  • A principal public school on the British model should be established for English education and teacher training.[3]

Outcomes

See also

References