User talk:134.139.234.41 and Talk:Diffraction from slits: Difference between pages
Message re. Public Law 110-343 (HG) |
m Signing comment by Hayimd - "" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SpectroscopyProject|class=B|importance=Mid|comments=}} |
|||
Strictly speaking, isn't the "array of narrow slits" problem formulated in Section 1.3 really an 'interference' effect rather than 'diffraction'? The slits are being treated as point sources, and hence there is no massive obstacle that can cause any diffraction. I'm not sure if this distinction between the two phenomena is universally used, so I haven't edited. What do we think? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hayimd|Hayimd]] ([[User talk:Hayimd|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hayimd|contribs]]) 22:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== October 2008 == |
|||
Would someone please move the approximation out of the multislit section to the appropriate section. |
|||
[[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public+Law+110-343?diff=243717837 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Public Law 110-343]] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. You may also wish to read the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction to editing]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 19:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Can we start with double slit? |
|||
What is this integration over y stuff needed for? |
|||
The single slit and multiple slit formulas differ only in sum vs integral, |
|||
leading to geometric sum vs sinc. Why is there sooo much repeating? |
|||
[[User:Arnero|Arnero]] 18:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I have repaired some of the mathematics - there is difference between [[approximation]] and true [[Identity (mathematics)]]. Bracketing in one case was described as approximation, and omission of another exponential term was not given proper explanation. D. Georgiev <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/58.89.126.168|58.89.126.168]] ([[User talk:58.89.126.168|talk]]) 16:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Revision as of 22:10, 10 October 2008
 | Spectroscopy B‑class (inactive) | ||||||
| |||||||
Strictly speaking, isn't the "array of narrow slits" problem formulated in Section 1.3 really an 'interference' effect rather than 'diffraction'? The slits are being treated as point sources, and hence there is no massive obstacle that can cause any diffraction. I'm not sure if this distinction between the two phenomena is universally used, so I haven't edited. What do we think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayimd (talk • contribs) 22:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Would someone please move the approximation out of the multislit section to the appropriate section.
Can we start with double slit?
What is this integration over y stuff needed for?
The single slit and multiple slit formulas differ only in sum vs integral, leading to geometric sum vs sinc. Why is there sooo much repeating? Arnero 18:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I have repaired some of the mathematics - there is difference between approximation and true Identity (mathematics). Bracketing in one case was described as approximation, and omission of another exponential term was not given proper explanation. D. Georgiev —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.89.126.168 (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)