User talk:RainbowOfLight: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 244521653 by RainbowOfLight (talk)
m Reverted edits by 169.233.115.203 to last version by RainbowOfLight (HG)
Line 1: Line 1:
Yes, I can suck my own dick - I view this as more of a personal fact
Yes, I do delete messages from this page from time to time - I view this as more of a personal
messenger page, and people don't need (or want) to read everything that's ever been said to me. Quoting from [[Wikipedia:User_page]]: ''Removal of comments...Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred...'' Comments are never really gone - they're always in my history. I don't like this page to be full... think of it like a desktop. I don't want to have to go searching "through a pile of papers" (scrolling to the bottom of the page) to find an ongoing conversation. [[User:RainbowOfLight|<font color="#D60047">Rainbow</font><font color="#00A300">Of</font><font color="#0A47FF">Light</font>]] [[User_Talk:RainbowOfLight|<font color="#5200A3"><sup><small>Talk</small></sup></font>]] 11:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

----
MY NIPPLES ARE MADE OF SPAGHETTI!
<!--add comments below this line-->
<!--add comments below this line-->

Stop deleting my stuff


hi rainbow of light thank you for your welcome message. I had a few questions. I was looking at the article for "Urdu" language, and in the first paragraph I saw some edits that I thought was vandalism. Was it ok for me to remove that promptly, without discussion? [[User:Canton japan|Canton japan]] ([[User talk:Canton japan|talk]]) 11:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Canton japan|Canton japan]] ([[User talk:Canton japan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Canton japan|contribs]]) 10:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
hi rainbow of light thank you for your welcome message. I had a few questions. I was looking at the article for "Urdu" language, and in the first paragraph I saw some edits that I thought was vandalism. Was it ok for me to remove that promptly, without discussion? [[User:Canton japan|Canton japan]] ([[User talk:Canton japan|talk]]) 11:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Canton japan|Canton japan]] ([[User talk:Canton japan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Canton japan|contribs]]) 10:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 06:08, 11 October 2008

Yes, I do delete messages from this page from time to time - I view this as more of a personal messenger page, and people don't need (or want) to read everything that's ever been said to me. Quoting from Wikipedia:User_page: Removal of comments...Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred... Comments are never really gone - they're always in my history. I don't like this page to be full... think of it like a desktop. I don't want to have to go searching "through a pile of papers" (scrolling to the bottom of the page) to find an ongoing conversation. RainbowOfLight Talk 11:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


hi rainbow of light thank you for your welcome message. I had a few questions. I was looking at the article for "Urdu" language, and in the first paragraph I saw some edits that I thought was vandalism. Was it ok for me to remove that promptly, without discussion? Canton japan (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canton japan (talkcontribs) 10:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I appreciate your revertion of the Rasmussen page as it appears to be a defamation of the person, but the name was taken from a local small controvercy, and created with the intent of vandelism. To my credit no proof of the existance of the 'Raz Theorum' exists on the internet, and it was done with the intent of reparing the vandelism, by correcting the matter. If no validation exists, must the information be deleted? WROKKR (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah but its another Thomas Rasmussen, Otherwise you have my agreement. WROKKR (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I am a student in a graduate degree in sociology in Boston, MA and I am in the process of writing a paper on how people use and edit Wikipedia, and on the ways in which they participate and interact (or not) with other editors.

Would you be willing to talk with me about that? I am flexible about the time of the interview and media we use (phone, IM, email), just let me know what works for you. I am looking forward to hearing back from you. Please leave me a message on my User page or email me.

Thank you very much! Buburuza (talk) 01:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for your welcome message. BTW, in case you weren't aware of it, I did want to point out that your welcome messages get double signed. 75.4.225.219 (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandlism

Impressive. You are always one step ahead of me on reverting vandalism. When I enter a page (that have just been edited) that I think has been vandalised, you've just reverted it. I've got no chance. Keep it up thou! :) Jon swe (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, ok. Btw, how many times should I worn someone before reporting them? Jon swe (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm not useing huggle thou. Think I'll check it out. Thanks. Jon swe (talk) 09:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Dear RainbowOfLight, thanks for reverting vandalism from my talk page. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]