User talk:Roastytoast

You have new messages (last change).

Leave me a message, From now on I will respond on YOUR talk page.

IF YOU ARE HERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT A WRONGLY PLACED VANDALISM TAG CLICK HERE

Sup, and nice bout what? that's ok, i got the code my self.Rise Against713 21:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Rise Against713 22:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

just getting startedRise Against713 22:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC) i have other things to do, sorry got to goRise Against713 21:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I found an error on the OHS article (yea there is one) it said that dennis hastard was the current speaker of the house (of course i fixed that) Rise Against713 23:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Great ROASTYTOAST 22:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

manga

you read manga right to leftRise Against713 21:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Yea I know ROASTYTOAST 21:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

userbox

where can i get the scrubs, futrama, and the clinton boxes? Rise Against713 22:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

no but i just deleted reverted it for you Rise Against713 23:08, 10

that's ok, i got the code my self.Rise Against713 21:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

i have other things to do, sorry got to goRise Against713 21:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

wikiholic

dude i took the wikiholic test, Check my score on my user pageRise Against713 01:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

slightly lower than my first one but still impressive none the less ROASTYTOAST 01:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

yea sorry about the signature thing (just frogot) any way i took the wikiholic test again. i got a much better score this time Rise Against713 23:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

I was tagged with a vandalism warning concerning the article on teenage pregnancy by this user "Roasty Toast". I have read the wiki page on Vandalism on my edits didn't seem to fall into the mentioned categories. I did read that when a vandalism warning is given that a reason is also supposed to be given. Large amounts of my contribution to the article were deleted. As for as I know according to Wiki policy deleting edits unless they are falsifiable is considered vandalism. If information falls into a gray category editors are supposed to ask for citations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.168.239.61 (talk) 03:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC).

This is what I reverted "Stopping adult men from preying on young girls." which is really a nonsense edit. And any edit that isn't constructive is considered vandalism. Feel free to discuss this matter with me. ROASTYTOAST 15:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I was also tagged with vandalsim for a change to the rabbit breeds section. I removed "Conner is very good looking too." from the American Fuzzy Lop section because it makes absolutely no sense in the context of that article. I have no idea what "Conner" is in the context of American Fuzzy lops (nor why such a useless subjective statement is in there). I thought I was helping to clean up the article, but this was reported as "vandalism" and the change was reverted.

hey i forgot how to put on the anti vandal tool and for some reason i don't have it so can u help? Rise Against713 02:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

ok how do i get it to show my the edits with the green and yellow box things? Rise Against713 02:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

how do you give warnings? Rise Against713 03:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Belated Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Roastytoast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Dfrg.msc 23:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I gathered that, and I thought it was a shame that you hadn't been welcomed yet. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 23:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

BARNSTAR

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I Rise Against713, give you the anti-vandalism barnstar Rise Against713 18:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

CHICOTW

I see your user name listed as a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago. I do not know if you are aware that we are attempting to revive the CHICOTW. See our results history. We could use additional input in nominating future articles, voting on nominees and editing winning nominees. Should you contribute you will receive weekly notices like the following:

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Last week you voted for the Chicago COTW. Thank you! This week Rich Melman has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger 01:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

contents

how do you make a contents box like the ones in articles? --Barkus23 18:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Yay

Barkus 02:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Arena Football League

hey i put my name on the members list. when will we get a box? Rise Against713 23:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

hey i started to put the project box on the teams talk pages (i started at Tampa Bay Storm and worked my way up) Rise Against713 02:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

i put the project on all the teams (that you didn't), and AFL on ESPN. also when are whe goning to get a picture on the project banner? Rise Against713 03:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

i put the banner on some of the last defunct teams Rise Against713 22:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

and all the arenas Rise Against713 22:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks For the BARNSTAR and awesome pic for the projectRise Against713 13:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ArenaBowl-Trophy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ArenaBowl-Trophy.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)