Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhaam Dhoom: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:'''Keep''': Um, the film launch for the film can be viewed [http://sifymax.com/bbhome/max_newpopup_new.php?f=DhamDhoom3_18dec06-128k.wmv&site=max here] and [http://sifymax.com/bbhome/max_newpopup_new.php?f=DhamDhoom2_18dec06-128k.wmv&site=max here]. |
:'''Keep''': Um, the film launch for the film can be viewed [http://sifymax.com/bbhome/max_newpopup_new.php?f=DhamDhoom3_18dec06-128k.wmv&site=max here] and [http://sifymax.com/bbhome/max_newpopup_new.php?f=DhamDhoom2_18dec06-128k.wmv&site=max here]. |
||
*'''Weak delete''' as crystal balling. Similar articles on soon-to-exist English language films are deleted all the time. [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 20:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Weak delete''' as crystal balling. Similar articles on soon-to-exist English language films are deleted all the time. [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 20:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
::But why is there an importance to English films? Indian films are more known worldwide. Wikipedia is a worldwide project not a British/American project! |
::But why is there an importance to English films? Indian films are more known worldwide. Wikipedia is a worldwide project not a British/American project![[User:Prince Godfather|Prince Godfather]] 12:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 12:27, 27 December 2006
Dhaam Dhoom
Unsourced crystal balling. Contested prod. MER-C 12:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Definite Keep: It is sourced! 3 times to be precise! You are deleting the information without discussion! Prince Godfather 12:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is a discussion. As for the concerns, it's still crystal balling and all sources must be reliable. MER-C 12:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- The sources are reliable! Prince Godfather 12:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- One's a list of screenshots from a movie (which doesn't count) and I'm not convinced about the other two. We'll see what happens. MER-C 13:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Is there a notability threshold in the English language Wiki for movies made in languages OTHER than English? Eddie.willers 13:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- There are currently no guidelines relating to notability of any films, English-language or otherwise. WP:NOTFILM was not outright rejected, but it is considered historical. -- Kicking222 14:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- You can fall back on the standard notability threshold then - multiple, non-trivial, independent sources. Trebor 15:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep for now, it does have sources. Can you explain why you're not convinced about the other two? Trebor 15:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete - Also high budget Hollywood films are deleted until more information and/or release. I don't find such article is neccesary now, and before release a lot of things can changes. --Cate | Talk 15:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- A 4th source has been put up.Prince Godfather 16:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Um, the film launch for the film can be viewed here and here.
- Weak delete as crystal balling. Similar articles on soon-to-exist English language films are deleted all the time. Ford MF 20:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- But why is there an importance to English films? Indian films are more known worldwide. Wikipedia is a worldwide project not a British/American project!Prince Godfather 12:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)