User talk:Climie.ca: Difference between revisions
→Chevrons+: new section |
→FYI: done |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
Enigma has rightly pointed out to me that I've made a mistake on the Op Totalise/Tractable map :( I'll upload a corrected version asap. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC) |
Enigma has rightly pointed out to me that I've made a mistake on the Op Totalise/Tractable map :( I'll upload a corrected version asap. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
:OK, that's now fixed, and I've altered the SS counterattacks map to show Canadian national flags instead of the military ones (mainly for clarity and consistency with other maps). [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Chevrons+ == |
== Chevrons+ == |
Revision as of 17:13, 10 October 2008
This is Climie.ca's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Operation Tractable
In regards to basic MoS, I don't see anything wrong with it. The prose looks good, although they always find something to improve during the FAC. :) JonCatalán(Talk) 04:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXXI (September 2008) | |
|
New featured articles: New featured lists: New featured topics: New A-Class articles: |
| |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
GA Reviews
Hey Cam. I was looking over 13th Airborne Division and 17th Airborne Division to see whether I could nom for a Good Topic (I can't, but thats another thing I guess), and I looked at their GA Reviews, and I can't say I'm entirely happy with them. They were done by Redmarkviolinist, and they seem a little on the short side, and a bit too ready to be passed. I reckon that they are GA-Class, but I want to be double-sure to feel like I deserve them. Should I put them up for GAR, or find someone to give them a look over? Thanks for the help, I know that you're busy, Skinny87 (talk) 07:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
FYI
Enigma has rightly pointed out to me that I've made a mistake on the Op Totalise/Tractable map :( I'll upload a corrected version asap. EyeSerenetalk 17:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- OK, that's now fixed, and I've altered the SS counterattacks map to show Canadian national flags instead of the military ones (mainly for clarity and consistency with other maps). EyeSerenetalk 17:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Chevrons+
I'm speechless, and truly grateful. Thank you! EyeSerenetalk 16:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)