1913-14 in Belgian football

Slightly out of date

I'm certain that the latest manga chapter to be released is 556, not 555. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.36.116.152 (talk) 23:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I think this post isn't relevant anymore because the manga is now finished as of chapter 558. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xosofine02 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

What!?

• Uh, since when is Kagome the main character!? It's called Inuyasha. Please fix it.

She is one of the main characters. Inuyasha is the titular character. That doesn't mean he is the only important one. It is as much Kagome's story as it is Inuyasha's. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 05:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Collectonian is right. check out Protagonist sometime.--88wolfmaster (talk) 02:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Kagome is the main character moreso than Inuyasha because of the link between Kagome and Kikyo.(Usertalk:dsutt) 23:22, 13 July 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsutt (talk • contribs)

Why the heck would Kikyo get to decide who's the main character? Besides, Inuyasha has a significant connection to Kikyo as well. -- AvatarMN (talk) 06:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree with AvatarMN. And anyway, about the most recent edit, why should Kagome be mentioned before InuYasha? He's the anime's namesake, and if you want to get technical, he was the first character to be introduced in both the manga and anime while attacking the village. --BaKa-NEKO (talk) 20:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Kagome is the main character and also the narrorator. The story revoles around her, InuYasha, Naraku, and Kikyo. Also AvatarMN Kikyo didn't "decide" that Kagome would be the main charactor, when the series was created it was decided that Kagome would be Kikyo's reincarnation. The Shikon no Tama was in her body, not InuYasha's. On a final note do not forget that InuYasha would still be bound to the tree if Kagome hadn't pulled out the arrow.71.126.79.98 (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

May be both of them is better. On my opinion, Higurashi Kagome and Inu Yasha have the nearly same "main" characteristic. Furthermore, they are a couple and they work mostly together. As Inu Yasha appear, we can nearly see Kagome and vice versa. And, please Mr/Ms 71.126.79.98, the thing that Kagome is the narrator or whether she had pulled the arrow out of Inu Yasha have no meaning in deciding who is the main character. Many narrator are not the main character. And, Mrs Takahashi Rumiko did decide that Kagome would free Inu Yasha of the Tree of Ages, thus no "if" here !!!!

BTW, why won't we ask Mrs Takahashi ? 137.132.250.12 (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Kilala

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), should we not move the Kirara article to Kilala and change her name throughout the articles? Romanization to either R or L is equally accurate, and the name is pronounced Kilala in English, and should be written so here in the English Wikipedia. After all, we use Krillin and not Kuririn. -- AvatarMN (talk) 10:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

The pronunciation isn't the deciding factor, its how it is spelling in the manga (primary work). How does Viz spell it in the manga volumes? -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 10:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you probably have a point there. But I don't know, I've only watched the anime. Anyone? -- AvatarMN (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

It's Kirara, without a doubt. I just checked ^__^ --BaKa-NEKO (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

New Anime short

I've heard from Anime News Network that a new InuYasha anime short called "Black Tessaiga" is set to air at the end of July. See this link: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-07-09/new-inuyasha-short-to-debut-at-tokyo-takahashi-event. Shouldn't this be added to the anime section under Media? -- 69.244.125.218 (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

It hasn't been added yet mostly because nothing else is known about it yet. If its an anime short, a special, an OVA, length etc. Nothing but a title. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 02:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree. No actions should be taken until this "short" has officially premiered, and more information is made public to the western world. If it is true, though, (and I don't yet have reason to believe that it isn't) I eagerly await any news. --BaKa-NEKO (talk) 06:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, check it out. It's the intro to the Rumic Theatre exhibit, featuring Lum, Ataru, Ranma, InuYasha, and Kagome: --LINK REMOVED PER WP:COPYRIGHT--

Think we should do anything with this? --BaKa-NEKO (talk) 03:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

No, we don't use video clips from YouTube for anything, and that clip is clearly a violation of WP:COPYRIGHT -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 04:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

My sincerest apologies, I didn’t quite realize that (as I’ve seen various other links to YouTube on Wikipedia ^^). I just read the “Linking to Copyrighted Works” bit, so I’ll be sure not to make the mistake again.

I don’t think that I made my initial question clear, however. I meant to ask if we should do anything with the information given, now that we know the Rumic World exhibit is, in fact, taking place, or if we should wait for more.

Again, I apologize for the inconvenience.

--BaKa-NEKO (talk) 04:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

YouTube can sometimes be linked to, when its a video uploaded by copyright holders. Often times, though, such links are there inappropriately and just haven't been caught yet. For the question, though, I don't think there was any question about the exhibit, but until it happens, there really isn't much we can say about it in relation to InuYasha. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 04:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Black Tetsusaiga just aired. There is a summary about it here: http://www.furinkan.com/iycompanion/anime/specials.html#1 -- 69.244.125.218 (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Protected

Arising from the WP:AN3 report I have protected this page for 4 days. However if the recent editors can confirm that they will stop edit warring I will unprotect it, or you can request it from any admin at WP:RFPU. I have no objection to any admin removing the protection. Stifle (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Merge Tokijin to Sesshomaru

If my memory is not bad:

• Tessaiga has been merged to Inu Yasha (character)
• Then, the information about Tessaiga in Inu Yasha (character) has been deleted.
• Now I can't find any information about Tessaiga in English Wikipedia.

Thus, I wonder if Tokijin was merged to Sesshomaru, will it be deleted as Tessaiga ?

And, I think Tokijin, Tessaiga, Tenseiga, etc are worthy enough to have their own pages.

Just my opinion and I'm very sorry if it's somewhat impolite, cause I'm not good at English.

Regards

137.132.250.10 (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

It is tagged for merging to Sesshomaru. Their having their own article has nothing to do with "worth" but real-world notability, which none of the swords have. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 14:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

The Tessaiga, Tenseiga and Tokijin I think they have enough real-world notability. There are a considerable number of people know it.

Furthermore, can an article about the character have enough space to carry the information of the sword ? As we can see, the information about Tokijin, Tessaiga, Tenseiga in the article of Inu Yasha, Sesshomaru are written in summarized form. I think, the summarized information in the character's article can't be enough. Thus, these swords need their own article. If the articles about the swords and weapons in Inu Yasha are needed deleting, why there name are still in the specimen ?

And I still don't understand about the Tessaiga's information as I have stated. Now I can't find anything about Tessaiga in English Wikipedia.

137.132.250.10 (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

How many people "know it" is not real world notability. Real-world notability is determined by significant coverage in reliable, third party sources, not by fan love. And no, the swords do not need their own articles. They are weapons, not people. This is not a fansite nor an in-depth fictional guide. Wikipedia provides summary information about the topics, not extensive details. Brief mentions in relation to their wielders is all the attention the swords need.-- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 17:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thus, the Lightsabers of the Jedi Knights have enough condition to have their own article ? Actually I am still confused about it. Can you explain more about this problem ? Thank you very much.

And, you haven't answer about the fate of Tessaiga's information.

P.S: may be the IP now is different but I am the same person. I'm very sorry for all the inconvenient.

137.132.3.9 (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

All relevant information about Tessaiga is in InuYasha's article. Lightsabers may have real-world notability. I don't see any signs that it has been challenged. Either way, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 07:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Name of Inu Yasha's character and items written in Japanese letters

Where can we find the source which have the things that I have mentioned in the title ? (I'm really sorry that I can only read English sources.) Thanks.137.132.250.12 (talk) 12:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)