Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/899 (number): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:06, 10 October 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by Barneca. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 18:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

899 (number)

Contested prod. I'm not sure why this warrants a separate article, or even why anyone would search for this term. Reference is for a magazine whose publishing date is six days from now. TN‑X-Man 17:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In America, the date on the cover reflects the date the magazine goes off the stand, not the date of publication, which may be from a week to a month before the cover date. This is a very important fact in contemporary American history, and it deserves to be known. The American people deserve and need to know this. All numbers should have their own page. 899 no less than other numbers. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  '''Speedily deleted by Barneca. Non-admin closure. <b><font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font>‑<font color="darkblue"><big><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></big></font>-<font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font></b> 18:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)'''
 ===[[899 (number)]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
 :{{la|899 (number)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:899 (number)|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/899 (number)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/899 (number)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 October 10#{{anchorencode:899 (number)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 9: / Line 16: @@
 This is a very important fact in contemporary American history, and it deserves to be known. The American people deserve and need to know this.
 All numbers should have their own page. 899 no less than other numbers. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>