Talk:For Better or For Worse and Pit cave: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
add info |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Golondrinas Entrance Rappelling.png|right|thumb|250px|A caver rappelling into Mexico's enormous pit cave, [[Cave of Swallows|Sotano de las Golandrinas]].]] |
|||
{{comicsproj|class=C|importance=High|Strips-work-group=yes}} |
|||
A '''pit cave''' (or '''vertical cave'''), often simply called a "pit", is a type of natural [[cave]] passage which is a vertical shaft rather than a horizontal cave passage. Pit caves typically form in limestone as a result of long term erosion by water. Pit caves can be open to the surface or found deep within horizontal caves. A pit is generally categorized as a vertical drop of any depth that cannot be negotiated safely without the use of ropes or ladders. |
|||
== Real time == |
|||
Exploration into pit caves requires the use of nylon kermantle rope or cable ladders. More specialized caving techniques such as the [[Single Rope Technique|single rope technique]] (SRT) are common practice and the preferred method of pit exploration for cavers worldwide. The SRT involves the use of 10-11 mm nylon static rope and mechanical descenders/ascenders. |
|||
The article notes that FBoFW operates in "real time" and cites "Baby Blues" and "Gasoline Alley" as two other examples. That's not entirely true. FBoFW really, really operates in real, real time. The characters age exactly as they would in real life. The other two strips operate in "stretched time" (that's my terminology). The characters age, but at a much slower pace, perhaps 1 year for every 3 elapsed years. I think the article should make that distinction, but I'm not sure exactly the best way to word it. Any suggestions? [[User:Joedeshon|Joe]] 21:17, 26 September 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, a lot of strips let their kids age to a certain point and then 'freeze', like Blondie, Peanuts, and Dennis the Menace. There are a lot less that let the kids grow up to adulthood, although that seems to becoming more common nowadays with Safe Havens and Doonesbury, to give a couple of examples. I don't know about "stretched time', although that may be a good term; Gasoline Alley operates more like Safe Havens, in that the characters freeze for a long time at a particular age and then age very quickly to another milestone, then freeze again and keep doing that to keep pace more or less with real events ('hopping time'?). Doonesbury took yet another track; it started as a college strip, then, after 12 or so years, let its characters age to catch up with their generation. [[User:CFLeon|CFLeon]] 00:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
==Pit caving== |
|||
This has to be one of the few continuing-story comic strips still in widespread newspaper syndication; it's certainly the main one in the Nashville, Tennessee market. I also think that it's remarkable that there is no concession made to the U.S. market; everything is explicity Canadian -- distances in kilometres, a train trip from Ontario to Vancouver, etc., which is fine with me, but something that U.S. syndicators have generally shied away from in the past, as everything seemed to need to be either American or "foreign" but not explictly Canadian for some reason.[[User:Rlquall|Rlquall]] 14:47, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Vertical [[caving]], also called "pit caving", is a specialized sport that should be undertaken only after acquiring knowledge of, and expertise in, proper vertical caving equipment and its use. For obvious reasons, vertical caving is more dangerous than "horizontal caving". Vertical caving requires the intimate understanding of ropes, knots, anchors, rappelling devices and ascending systems. Veteran cavers typically are knowledgeable in self rescue techniques including change-overs (the act of switching from rappel to climb while on rope) and pick-offs (the act of rescuing a stranded caver from their rope and returning them to the ground). |
|||
:I actually find that to be one of the strip's charms. [[User:CFLeon|CFLeon]] 00:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
American caver [[Bill Cuddington]], known as "Vertical Bill" and honored as the "father of vertical caving", developed the SRT in the late 1950s. Since the inception of SRT, specialized nylon ropes and vertical accessories have evolved, making vertical caving a far safer practice. The development of the [[rappel rack]] and the evolution of mechanical ascension systems in the 1970s helped extend the practice of pit exploration to a larger venue of established cavers. |
|||
Anyone know where I can find info on the strips that have been published in books? I know there's a lot of them, but I haven't been able to find any info about the order the books go in. [[User:Garrett Albright|Garrett Albright]] 06:36, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|||
: [http://www.fborfw.com/store/catalog/index.php?cPath=21_27&osCsid=3d6f4d4dd3b340cf8916613974c2253b FBoFW Online Store] would seem to be a list of all the compilation books in publication order. And judging by the artwork on the covers, I'd say they cover the family's development in chronological order as well. [[User:MrItty|MrItty]] 17:54, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|||
==Notable pit caves== |
|||
: Look in any of the books, and they list all the ones published in their order, which reprints the strips in chronological order. Only thing missing is a listing of what dates are covered by which book. [[User:129.188.33.222|129.188.33.222]]emb021 |
|||
*Sótano de Las Golandrinas ("[[Cave of Swallows]]"), [[San Luis Potosí]], [[Mexico]], at 1,094 feet, is the world's deepest freefall drop. |
|||
------- |
|||
*Fantastic Pit, [[Ellisons Cave System]], [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]], [[USA]], at 586 feet is the deepest freefall pit in the 48 contiguous US states. |
|||
*El Cap Pit, [[Alaska]], [[USA]], at 625 feet in depth, is the deepest freefall pit in the United States [http://www.caverbob.com/usadeep.htm]. |
|||
*Stupendous Pit, Rumbling Falls Cave, [[Tennessee]], [[USA]], this 202 foot pit drops into a 26 acre chamber, which is thought to be the largest subterranean room in North America. |
|||
*[[Hellhole]], West Virginia, USA is historically important for vertical cavers. It's 154-foot entrance drop was the site of development of the single rope technique in the 1950s and '60s. |
|||
:''and closely emulates them. Her son, unhappy at being constantly portrayed in the comic, is now alienated from her.'' |
|||
Could we have a cite for this, please? - [[User:Montrealais|Montréalais]] 20:58, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|||
{{Expand list|date=August 2008}} |
|||
: Indeed: When asked, "Do you ever get the feeling that your family thinks you’re looking at them, waiting for material to happen?" Johnston replied: "Never. That would be like looking at an oven, waiting for a cake to happen. You have to make it up." [http://cagle.msnbc.com/hogan/interviews/johnston/home.asp] This is from her POV not her son's, but it does raise a question. [[User:JenKilmer|JenKilmer]] 16:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Caves]] |
|||
------- |
|||
[[Category:Cave geology]] |
|||
'''An internal contradiction'''. In the second paragraph of the intro, the article says Elly Patterson, the housewife, is a "book store-owner". Under the Main characters section, it says she is a "toy store-owner". Does anyone know which it is? Thanks. --[[User:Tregonsee|Tregonsee]] 01:33, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
{{geology-stub}} |
|||
She owns the store Liliputs (or something like that) which sells books, toys, model trains, and board games. --[[User:Quadraxis|Quadraxis]] |
|||
:She did until recently, when she sold it. [[User:CFLeon|CFLeon]] 00:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
2006: |
|||
Paul Wright requested a transfer to Spruce Narrows, but there is nothing in the strip that suggests the transfer ever went through. In the letters, Liz refers to making plans to visit him in White River which, in the strip, is where his parents live. |
|||
== Farley == |
|||
Hi: |
|||
I'd be hard pressed to cite anything, but I recall that Farley's death was used, according to press reports I remember reading at the time, in sermons and to 'talk about death' with kids because it happened the week of the Oklahoma bombing that killed all those people. |
|||
Personally, I don't like the way this sentence runs in the article. It implies that the strip was written specially to help those people, whereas the strips are actually written weeks in advance and that they happened to fall on the same days is purely coincidental. (The Wizard of Magicland) |
|||
== Various issues == |
|||
#'''Elizabeth's birthdate''': It's true that Liz's birthdate is officially listed as June 26, 1981. [http://www.fborfw.com/char_pgs/liz/] However, that mildly contradicts the real-time nature of the strip, since an archived strip on the official site at [http://www.fborfw.com/timetravel/archives/000834.php] shows Elizabeth as a baby in a strip dated February 8, 1981. |
|||
#'''Minor characters''': I wonder whether we need all of these people listed, some of whom were never significant characters, and others who haven't been seen in years. Examples of those who could be dropped from the list are Andrea Sobinski, Ardith Narayan, Beatrice Alfarero, Bev Cruikshank, Fiona Brass, Lily Petrucci, Maxine Hébert, Paul Bergan, Steve Nichols, and William Patterson. And Ned Tanner should be demoted from supporting character, since he was a figurine rather than a person. |
|||
:Agreed. Is it really necessary to list the Rabbits, for instance??? [[User:CFLeon|CFLeon]] 00:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Animated series and specials''': ''While the TV series never really caught on, many Canadian children know this animated version better than the original comic strip.'' If the TV series never caught on, how could it be better known to children than the comic strip -- unless the comic strip was barely known to them? I suppose that's possible, but it's implausible and should be sourced. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] 07:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::It's worded badly, in Ontario the show was on a tv station known as teletoon for approximately five years I believe. As such, it gained a fair bit of notoriety. I only began reading the strip myself due to this. |
|||
:Regarding #1, Lynn said on her website that the characters began to age some time after the strip started, so Elizabeth's age at the beginning isn't consistent with her later-assigned birth date. [[User:Paul 012|Paul C]] 17:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:It's [http://www.fborfw.com/behind_the_scenes/q_eh/index.php?id=21 here], specifically. [[User:Paul 012|Paul C]] 17:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Old storylines == |
|||
I thought that it didn't make sense for the page to only reflect the storylines from the last couple years, so I took a little time going through the earliest books to try to summarize the first few years of the strip, and updated the page with those years (79-82). I tried to include only the events that seemed most notable, in the context of either the year (like the Pattersons' vacations), the emphasis of the strip (Connie's love life may not seem that important but it seemed to be the focus of more strips in the early years than almost anything else), the overarching story of the strip (Farley's arrival, Michael crushing on Deanna), or the characters (Elly's constant feelings of inadequacy, John being a jerk, etc.). Basically the things that might look relevant later on. |
|||
An argument could be made that it would be too much detail to do this for each of the years; in my opinion, because the strip is so unusual in the way it chronicles an ongoing storyline, it's worth while and it's different from detailing the themes of each week in <i>Curtis</i> or something like that. It also seems like the storylines could eventually be spun off into their own page. But I didn't want to put any more time into it immediately if people thought it shouldn't be in the Wikipedia at all. I've never added any info to WP before and only gotten around to registering an account right after I added the info to the FBOFW page earlier today.--[[User:Propaniac|Propaniac]] 02:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:The ongoing realtime nature of the stories are a unique feature of the strip, so it seems a worthwhile project, furthermore there are certainly book, comic & television series which have separate Wikipedia entries for each ''episode'' (with a '''lot''' of episodes), so an article doing a synopsis by year doesn't seem out-of-line at all (though to keep the main article a reasonable length I'd definitely suggest spinning it off as a separate article such as [[For Better or For Worse storylines by year]] <--- click here to start it ^_^). --[[User:Rsmcd|Invisifan]] 05:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:: I fully support inclusion of previous year's storylines - but as a separate link - please provide more! --[[Ninevah]] 08:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
What happened to the separate article that outlined storylines year-by-year? It used to be linked to the main article, but the link is gone and I cannot find the article by searching. I spent a LOT of time adding to that article and will therefore be livid if I discover that it is completely gone. Can anyone help?!?! [[User:Kborgesius|Kborgesius]] ([[User talk:Kborgesius|talk]]) 15:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:It's gone. There was an AFD a couple of weeks ago, which was closed as '''Keep''', but the editor who opened the AFD took it to review and consensus was to delete. Apparently, it was felt that an article that was entirely plot summary was non-encyclopedic. [[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] ([[User talk:Vgranucci|talk]]) 00:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Move Request== |
|||
''It was [[wikipedia:requested moves|requested]] that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at [[WP:RM#How to request a page move]] did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for time!'' |
|||
However, let me also note that the [http://www.fborfw.com/ official site] for ''For Better of For Worse'' seems to indicate that the current capitalization is correct. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' <small>(joturner)</small> 03:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Criticism == |
|||
Can we get a citation for the rather dubious assertion that "many" readers have problems with the political correctness of FBoFW? [[User:Mucus|Mucus]] 21:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I doubt it is possible — that section was added last night along with various edits that were indicative that the editor was '''highly''' pov-oriented (and living a life very sheltered from the rest of the world, if I may be a allow a slight dash of personal pov myself) ... in fact while cleaning it up I removed the whole section, but he put it back so I left it with ony a bit of toning down ... someone else removed half of it this morning though ... In any event if you look at the history & changes by this editor it seems likely that this section is actually a reflection of the editor's own personal feelings toward the strip.--[[User:Invisifan|Invisifan]] 23:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::I moved the "sourced" comments on the criticism, which are largely from interviews with Johnston, to a sub-section away from the unsourced "some readers have problems with" information. Also added a request for sources to the unsourced section. |
|||
::Johnston's view of the criticism she's received (and the comparative lack of criticism prior to Lawrence's coming out) is useful information, tho of course it's from her POV. So it's labelled as such. [[User:JenKilmer|JenKilmer]] 18:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
If the Foobiverse can be included in the links section, can it not also be used as a citation source for criticism? Other criticism sites include Comics Curmudgeon and April's Real Blog. If anyone needs a reader-based online critique and satire source, it's not hard to find - and reporting criticism would not then be the same as editor POV. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:71.33.195.94 |71.33.195.94 ]] ([[User talk:71.33.195.94 |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/71.33.195.94 |contribs]]) 11:16, October 5, 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|||
I am reluctant to remove text without prior discussion and a degree of consensus but this observation would in my view certainly require a citation as to which readers are referred to as to problems with political correctness. I should think it could come out unless such a citation were forthcoming. On the other hand, the note at the top of the article that it reads like an advertisement and is questionably neutral in its point of view is -- or was --not without validity. I have inserted a number of sourced qualifications -- one by Johnston herself ("I have to admit that I'm not in a place where I can do this," Johnston says. "I'm past the point where I can remember what it's like to be a young mother."<ref>http://www.lynnlake.ca/A_Place_to_Remember_13.html Retrieved 12 October 2006.</ref>). [[User:Masalai|Masalai]] 00:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I'm not familiar with Comics Curmudgeon and April's Real blog, but Foobiverse is clearly an inappropriate link for the article as per [[WP:EL]], section 1.9 since it's just a blog. [[User:Mucus|Mucus]] 04:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Minor Characters == |
|||
Can the minor characters be placed in a separate article? The FBORFW article is getting quite lengthy with these listed. [[User:Ninevah|Ninevah]] 00:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I've put all characters in a separate article. And it promptly got a note suggesting that it be merged with the main article! [[User:Masalai|Masalai]] 04:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::I think the separate article makes sense - this was getting WAY long! [[User:JenKilmer|JenKilmer]] 15:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Lawrence's "Coming Out"== |
|||
"So long as there was no offensive material, and Johnston was fully aware of what she was doing, Universal Press would support the action. Johnston's personal reflections on Lawrence, an excerpt from the comic collection "It's the Thought That Counts...", are included on the strip's official webpage." |
|||
Of course, "no offensive material" in this context means nothing that is offensive to the gay-rights activists. Johnston and her editors completely disregarded, and doubtless have no concern for, the many hundreds of thousands of persons who have deeply felt religious and moral objections to the type of behavior that she was depicting, both in the "coming out" series and in later having Lawrence appear with his boyfriend. It was only 25 years ago that most persons would recoiled in horror and disgust at the idea of social acceptance of homosexual relationships, and that societal view was reflected in duly enacted laws of the national and provincial governments in Canada. Those laws were overturned not by the popular will, but by unelected judges placing their own interpretation on provisions in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. |
|||
Johnston's portrayal is completely one-sided, and she provided no opportunity for the presentation of any opposing view. |
|||
[[User:John Paul Parks|John Paul Parks]] ([[User talk:John Paul Parks|talk]]) 03:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)John Paul Parks[[User:John Paul Parks|John Paul Parks]] ([[User talk:John Paul Parks|talk]]) 03:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Get over it. Homosexuality is a reality, and always has been. Just because it bothers you doesn't mean everyone - cartoonists among them - need to cater to your prurient obsessions. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.212.45.188|71.212.45.188]] ([[User talk:71.212.45.188|talk]]) 08:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Same to you. |
|||
== Milborough == |
|||
How do we know that Milborough is near Barrie? Is this based on the two-hours up Yonge statement? In previous reading of the strip and articles, I'd got the impression that Milborough was a fictional town, perhaps Brampton, Oakville or Mississauga or Hamilton. Milborough Line runs through Oakville and Johnston used to live in Hamilton. |
|||
from the FBoFW webite FAQ "The elder Pattersons are definitely suburb dwellers; living about 45 minutes' drive from the city in Milborough, which resembles Etobicoke or Newmarket." [[User:208.101.91.76|208.101.91.76]] 00:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: Well, it's definitely not Brampton, as of the time of April's birth. My dad took a workshop with her, and I think she would've said if she based it off Brampton. Milborough is more likely in Barrie or Hamilton, despite the fact Hamilton doesn't connect with Yonge. Of course, I don't think the geography of the town is based on anywhere. I guess one way to figure out where it is... does Barrie have rivers to sweep away April? -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 15:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: I wouldn't put too much stock in that "two hour drive up Yonge St." statement. If it's supposed to be a two hour drive up Yonge Street it's definitely not Barrie, as two hours North along Yonge (highway 11) would put you in Huntsville. I'm always thought of the Pattersons living in someplace more along the lines of Newmarket. {{unsigned|24.235.179.9}} |
|||
::: The only story arc I remember where the travel time from Mike and Deanna's home to the Patterson's is the one in March 2005 where April stops by, and Deanna wins the coin toss to drive her home. The drive is referred to as an hour drive (2-hour round trip) and they do use Yonge Street. I think I'm going to remove the 2 hour reference. As far as being near Barrie is concerned, the website does have a map, and the positioning of Millborough does make it seem to be close to Barrie.[[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] 06:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::: For what it's worth, the actual location of the Milborough dot on that map is pretty much level with Barrie, but it's on the ''opposite'' side of [[Lake Simcoe]], basically between [[Cannington, Ontario|Cannington]] and [[Beaverton, Ontario|Beaverton]] in [[Durham Region, Ontario|Durham Region]]. That's actually on Highway 12 rather than Highway 11, but Yonge Street/Highway 11 is a more logical and straightforward route from ''downtown'' Toronto than Highway 12 would be — 11 and 12 interchange at [[Orillia, Ontario|Orillia]], and the dot would be no more than ten to fifteen minutes back down the other side. So 45 minutes to an hour up Yonge is a reasonably good estimate, depending on city traffic. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 00:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Removal of line == |
|||
I'm removing the fallowing lines "In a November 2006 interview [http://www.mlive.com/entertainment/grpress/index.ssf?/base/features-0/11633175419490.xml&coll=6], Johnston said that characters in the strip will stop aging as of September 2007, and that the strip will continue as a mix of rerun classic strips and new material." for a few reasons, the first is that the interview is linked to earlier in the article, the second is no date is given for the ending and the third is that there is nothing in the interview to confirm the claim that it well continue as a mix of reruns and new material. [[User:Greatigers|Greatigers]] 03:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: That's how I took it too. I'll see if I can dig up the email I had once for Nancy, her exec, who could help straighten things out in a Wikinews interview. -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 15:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: The strip is inconsistent in its usage of US vs. Canadian spellings and expressions. There is a [http://www.fbofw.com/behind_the_scenes/q_eh/answers.php?show=69 Q & Eh response] acknowledging this, at the official site. |
|||
== Contradictions in Distribution Section== |
|||
Confused... At the beginning of this section, it says Johnston uses Canadian spelling and then at the end it says she uses generally US spelling... And British spelling (and usage) differs more from Canadian spelling than Canadian spelling from American. I'm pretty sure Johnston would choose sofa or couch over chesterfield, but I also wouldn't state that she goes out of the way to use American usage. Unless there is actual references to these, I would like remove these ambiguities. [[User:Saleah|Leah]] 04:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== "Nobody will get older" == |
|||
That's "nobody will get older than they are in the fall of 2007", right? The way I take it, there's no totally new storylines, it will all be revisiting various points, as she did in the TV series. -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 14:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Additional Characters== |
|||
I'm removing the section on Additional Characters, since it more properly belongs in the article "For Better or For Worse Characters" and doesn't seem to offer any new information from what is already in that article.[[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] 03:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Error on May 27, 2007 == |
|||
The last frame of the indicated date's comic has an error - although Elly boarded a bus that drives on the right hand side of the road, as in Canada/US/Europe, the bus is then seen driving on the left side of the road, as in Britain/Japan/Hong Kong. [[User:Gcapp1959|GBC]] 18:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:And your point is? [[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] 19:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::My point is... Oops! Nothing terribly wrong, just a visual goof that's kinda like when you see a blooper on a TV show but life goes on. [[User:Gcapp1959|GBC]] 16:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: All the cars are going in the same direction. It's a one-way road. http://www.fborfw.com/strip_fix/archives/2007_05.php. --[[User:Westendgirl|Westendgirl]] ([[User talk:Westendgirl|talk]]) 07:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Sole Author?== |
|||
In the Wikipedia article on comic strips its says Johnson, like Jim Davis (Garfield) are not the sole writers of their respecitve strips. If this is so is should be noted in the article? |
|||
[[User:4.142.126.94|4.142.126.94]] 06:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)eric |
|||
:The quote from the [[comic strip]] article is as follows: |
|||
::"Also, many strips, some of which are still in affiliation with the original creator, are drawn or written by multiple people or entire companies, such as Jim Davis' Garfield and Lynn Johnston's For Better or for Worse." |
|||
:Based on the FBoFW website, Johnston apparently still writes the strip, and does much of the drawing. An assistant does lettering and background art. I suppose that's what the comic strip article is referring to. [[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] 06:51, 12 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::News articles have stated that Johnston has had to cut back on drawing due to [[dystonia]], hence assistants do lettering and background art. [[User:JenKilmer|JenKilmer]] 06:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Fair use images - Bibliography == |
|||
The use of images not in compliance with our [[WP:FUC|fair-use criteria]] or our policy on [[WP:NONFREE|nonfree content]] is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. Durin's [[User:Durin/Fair use overuse explanation|essay on this]] is an excellent reference, but I'm happy to discuss the issue with anyone who needs clarification on the policy. -- [[User:Merope|Merope]] 19:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Why was this part of the Indigenous WikiProject? == |
|||
I don't understand the connection between FBoFW and the [[WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America/Anishinaabe]]. Can anybody explain why FBoFW would be of interest to that particular project? [[User:PKT|PKT]] 12:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*It probably was added during one character's (Elizabeth) time teaching in a First Nations community. You're right though, it probably doesn't have enough connection to the project to be included. I'll remove it. If anyone has any objections to that it can be reverted. [[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] 15:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
**Thanks Vgranucci!.........[[User:PKT|PKT]] 12:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Original Characters - Elizabeth == |
|||
Why is Elizabeth missing from the Original Characters section...? |
|||
Upon skimming the history, I notice that the revision on Jan 2nd removed part of the Original Characters section, but Elizabeth's info was short. |
|||
I was just cruising through and noticed, thought I would point it out. [[User:Shuckiduck|Shuckiduck]] ([[User talk:Shuckiduck|talk]]) 13:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*Good eye! I've returned Elizabeth to the Original Characters section.[[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] ([[User talk:Vgranucci|talk]]) 06:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Original Characters - Elly == |
|||
I've twice reverted edits changing Elly's description to "mother of three". At the time the strip started, Elly was a mother of two. [[User:Vgranucci|Vgranucci]] ([[User talk:Vgranucci|talk]]) 17:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== More recent reference for Criticism section == |
|||
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/26/AR2008082603480.html |
|||
A Washington Post article, dated 27 August 2008, about readers who follow the strip and criticise it. -- [[User:Logotu|Logotu]] ([[User talk:Logotu|talk]]) 15:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:51, 10 October 2008
A pit cave (or vertical cave), often simply called a "pit", is a type of natural cave passage which is a vertical shaft rather than a horizontal cave passage. Pit caves typically form in limestone as a result of long term erosion by water. Pit caves can be open to the surface or found deep within horizontal caves. A pit is generally categorized as a vertical drop of any depth that cannot be negotiated safely without the use of ropes or ladders.
Exploration into pit caves requires the use of nylon kermantle rope or cable ladders. More specialized caving techniques such as the single rope technique (SRT) are common practice and the preferred method of pit exploration for cavers worldwide. The SRT involves the use of 10-11 mm nylon static rope and mechanical descenders/ascenders.
Pit caving
Vertical caving, also called "pit caving", is a specialized sport that should be undertaken only after acquiring knowledge of, and expertise in, proper vertical caving equipment and its use. For obvious reasons, vertical caving is more dangerous than "horizontal caving". Vertical caving requires the intimate understanding of ropes, knots, anchors, rappelling devices and ascending systems. Veteran cavers typically are knowledgeable in self rescue techniques including change-overs (the act of switching from rappel to climb while on rope) and pick-offs (the act of rescuing a stranded caver from their rope and returning them to the ground).
American caver Bill Cuddington, known as "Vertical Bill" and honored as the "father of vertical caving", developed the SRT in the late 1950s. Since the inception of SRT, specialized nylon ropes and vertical accessories have evolved, making vertical caving a far safer practice. The development of the rappel rack and the evolution of mechanical ascension systems in the 1970s helped extend the practice of pit exploration to a larger venue of established cavers.
Notable pit caves
- Sótano de Las Golandrinas ("Cave of Swallows"), San Luis Potosí, Mexico, at 1,094 feet, is the world's deepest freefall drop.
- Fantastic Pit, Ellisons Cave System, Georgia, USA, at 586 feet is the deepest freefall pit in the 48 contiguous US states.
- El Cap Pit, Alaska, USA, at 625 feet in depth, is the deepest freefall pit in the United States [1].
- Stupendous Pit, Rumbling Falls Cave, Tennessee, USA, this 202 foot pit drops into a 26 acre chamber, which is thought to be the largest subterranean room in North America.
- Hellhole, West Virginia, USA is historically important for vertical cavers. It's 154-foot entrance drop was the site of development of the single rope technique in the 1950s and '60s.
 |
 | This geology article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |