User talk:220.253.28.41

Harajuku

Stop deleting chunks of this article or you will be blocked for vandalism. If some part merits deletion, explain this on the article's talk page and get agreement on it. -- Hoary (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

And be careful of who you accuse of vandalism. I am a 2 1/2 year editor, not some anonymous deletionist who won't even register. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I have edited the wikipedia for around 4 years. Mostly on the Japanese site. Hoary repeatedly reverted back to an article which had been vandalized previously, and reentering links and POV information which are prohibited from articles. I was in the process of reporting Hoary for admin abuse, and his block further fuels my claims. Now it appears I will have to wait for that, and in that time I will research his past actions to find any other related incidents. In addition, I have no reason to register and I am not required to register nor does that me a lesser editor than a register user. 220.253.28.41 (talk) 06:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

When your block (which you can appeal) expires, you are of course very free to report me for admin abuse. You are also of course very free to "research [my] past actions" (especially if you want to fall asleep quickly). I certainly don't want to dissuade you from that crusade; however, if you have any leftover time or energy, I recommend that you also write up a paragraph persuasively explaining what's wrong within the Harajuku article, for presentation on its talk page. After my demotion from admin I expect that I'll still be allowed to edit and I'd look forward to your comments on the article with some interest. If on the other hand you intend to sit out your short block and then return to unexplained deletions of parts of this article (with the occasional baseless allegation of vandalism), you can expect a longer block. -- Hoary (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I was in the process of appealing, unfortunately you pressed "save page" before me. I have been checking your edit history, and it seems you have a long history of editing the Harajuku article. Its funny that you never did the same actions when this same POV and nonsense information was removed last year, and remained until this edit [1]. Which even removes the official website for Harajuku and replaces it with personal links. My edits were not mass deletion, and were in fact a "manually undo" to an old version, which was not possible with the undo function. That article is in poor condition with a bunch of garbage that even you contest, ridiculous. 220.253.28.41 (talk) 06:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

In fact, most of the information removed is sourced from unreliable references (such as blogs) and therefor allowed to be deleted, and removing such information is not vandalism. It was also mentioned in the edit summary that it was POV with unreliable references, and the reason for deletion. So please do explain your comments about the edit summary. 220.253.28.41 (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

220.253.28.41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

2 reverts and a sentence rewrite, along with adding more detailed information to a photograph that can't be classified as vandalism. Admin abuse

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=''2 reverts and a sentence rewrite, along with adding more detailed information to a photograph that can't be classified as vandalism. Admin abuse'' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=''2 reverts and a sentence rewrite, along with adding more detailed information to a photograph that can't be classified as vandalism. Admin abuse'' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=''2 reverts and a sentence rewrite, along with adding more detailed information to a photograph that can't be classified as vandalism. Admin abuse'' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}