Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redhouse Yacht Club: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Bridgeplayer (talk | contribs) for delete |
Kevin Murray (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{la|Redhouse Yacht Club}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redhouse Yacht Club|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 28#{{anchorencode:Redhouse Yacht Club}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Redhouse Yacht Club}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redhouse Yacht Club|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 28#{{anchorencode:Redhouse Yacht Club}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Long established club admittedly but no statement that it has done anything notable and no multiple non-trivial sources. I prodded this but the prod was removed after 6 days with the comment "enough incoming links not to be prodded". In fact, apart from redirects and a DMB, the only incoming link is one that I added to the locality article! '''Delete'''. [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 04:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
Long established club admittedly but no statement that it has done anything notable and no multiple non-trivial sources. I prodded this but the prod was removed after 6 days with the comment "enough incoming links not to be prodded". In fact, apart from redirects and a DMB, the only incoming link is one that I added to the locality article! '''Delete'''. [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 04:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I see enough g-hits that are not just mirror sites etc. which discuss the Club. I also found three independent non-trivial articles which discuss the Club and/or its sponsored activities (regattas etc.) and added them as references --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 05:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:28, 28 January 2007
Redhouse Yacht Club
- Redhouse Yacht Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Long established club admittedly but no statement that it has done anything notable and no multiple non-trivial sources. I prodded this but the prod was removed after 6 days with the comment "enough incoming links not to be prodded". In fact, apart from redirects and a DMB, the only incoming link is one that I added to the locality article! Delete. Bridgeplayer 04:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I see enough g-hits that are not just mirror sites etc. which discuss the Club. I also found three independent non-trivial articles which discuss the Club and/or its sponsored activities (regattas etc.) and added them as references --Kevin Murray 05:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)