Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 28

< November 27	November 29 >

November 28

Image:Penguin_City.jpg

No evidence of CC licensing from Bob Lynch as claimed. Jusjih (talk) 02:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is Bob Lynch. I thought I'd given proper copyright but it appears that I'm wrong. I'll try to sort it out later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.217.244 (talk) 10:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted --B (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scientologylogo.png

Derivative work from an image deleted per Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2006_December_27#Image:Scientologylogo.GIF_.28talk_.7C_delete.29 Jusjih (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Slmcsbanner.jpg

With slmcs.org indicated, GFDL-self claim seems questionable. Jusjih (talk) 04:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Transparent uno.jpg

This image is merely showing how the CD looks like. I think it should be tagged the same way than a CD cover. Definitely non GFDL. -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note from the uploader of the image: I don't agree at all. It is not a straight copy of the CD cover (if you can call a transparent sleeve a cover in the first place) and IMO it infringes copyrights as much as a photo of somebody holding a mobile phone infringes Nokia's trademarked designs. Furthermore I took the photo myself (yep, that's my hand), so I really fail to see what's wrong with a GFDL license. Rien Post (talk) 01:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL makes sense to me, assuming that is your hand and not a refugee from the Addams Family...--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 01:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean the case is closed and I can remove the PUI tags? Where does this go from here? Rien Post (talk) 14:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 14 days. Images that are accepted following this fourteen-day period should have {{subst:puir}} added to the image talk page and a copy of the issue and/or discussion that took place here put on the image talk page as well."--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 14:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Colcannon 4215w.jpg

If the text had simply been posted on WP, it would obviously have been a copy-vio, and I see no difference here. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 17:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it wouldn't have been a copyvio, as recipes have been held to be generally non-copyrightable -- http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/copyright/copyright-realworld/recipe-copyrighting(1).html.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 22:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was of a generic recipe on the back of a bag of potatoes; it is no more copyright than a photo of a street scene containing adds in shop windows. (Sarah777 (talk) 22:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Agreed, should be kept. The Evil Spartan 04:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BAP Palacios and BAP Villar (Sep 1973-USN).JPG

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Resolved - Image is USN photo. SkierRMH (talk) 23:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC) Source is given as Peruvian Navy Archive, but the image is tagged as {{PD-USGov}}... Lupo 20:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the explanation about the source is quite simple: This picture was taken during the UNITAS exercise in 1973, from a US Navy ship, but i found it in a collection of pictures of the Peruvian Navy Archive. That`s why the source is the Peruvian Navy Archive, but the picture was taken by the US Navy. Greetings.Cloudaoc 22:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Image:Villianc.svg

Resolved

Closed on commons, should be closed here. ^Thanks, _{Luc "Somethingorother" French} 01:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the same as Villianc.jpg, which itself is in danger of being PUI'ed. RageSamurai21655 (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on. It was created by the same person who did Image:Piratey, vector version.svg. Obviously both are amalgams of several type-characters, the end result of which is considered own work, right? --190.74.108.43 01:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Villianc.jpg is in danger of being deleted because it looks too much like Snidely Whiplash. RageSamurai21655 18:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the actual debate, you'll find that it's probably not going to be deleted: the mustached, hook-nosed, top-hatted villain was a well known stereotype well before Snidely Whiplash was even a sketch. ^Thanks, _{Luc "Somethingorother" French} 01:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake: It was closed already, as a keep. [1]. So this should be closed. ^Thanks, _{Luc "Somethingorother" French} 01:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]