Talk:Acrassicauda and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Via Paxton (3rd nomination): Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Trencacloscas - "Latin???"
 
delete
 
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[Via Paxton]]===
{{Iraq|class=Stub|importance=Mid}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
{{HMM|class=Stub|importance=}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Via Paxton}}</ul></div>

:{{la|Via Paxton}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Via Paxton|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Via Paxton (3rd nomination)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Via Paxton (3rd nomination)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 October 8#{{anchorencode:Via Paxton}}|View log]])</noinclude>

No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at [[WP:PORNBIO]]. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] ([[User talk:Epbr123|talk]]) 10:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Latin???
* <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]]. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] ([[User talk:Epbr123|talk]]) 10:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)</span>

Sorry but acrassicauda does not mean "black scorpion" in Latin. Cauda means 'tail' and Acrassi is probably a place. [[User:Trencacloscas|Trencacloscas]] ([[User talk:Trencacloscas|talk]]) 22:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:PORNBIO]]. [[User:HollyHuntaway|HollyHuntaway]] ([[User talk:HollyHuntaway|talk]]) 19:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people|list of Living people-related deletion discussions]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 00:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete''' Not sourced, and shows no sign of being notable. [[User:Barliman Butterbur|Barliman Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Barliman Butterbur|talk]]) 00:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
So... probably "acrassicauda" is the scientific name given to a particular scorpion that lives in Iraq (I don't know), but the word definitely does not mean "black scorpion" (that should be "scorpio niger" in Latin). <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trencacloscas|Trencacloscas]] ([[User talk:Trencacloscas|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trencacloscas|contribs]]) 02:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Keep'''. Last AfD was a clear consensus keep and nothing has changed since then. [[User:Xihr|<span style="color: white; background: black; font-weight: bold; padding: 1px;">&nbsp;Xihr&nbsp;</span>]] 04:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
**'''Comment:''' Except [[WP:CCC|consensus can change]]. I'm still wading through the google hits to try to verify her biography. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 21:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
*** Sure it can, but there's zero evidence that it has here. Continuing to bring it to AfD despite clear consensus keep and no actual evidence of consensus changing whatsoever (that isn't even the argument the nominator makes here) is just trying to do an end run around consensus. If consensus doesn't matter, then we might as well all just pack our bags and go home. [[User:Xihr|<span style="color: white; background: black; font-weight: bold; padding: 1px;">&nbsp;Xihr&nbsp;</span>]] 01:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
****'''Comment''': Except prior "consensus" did not provide any evidence and ignored [[WP:V]]. Further, [[WP:PORNBIO]] was not established, giving a guideline to review the notability of the article. Consensus is changing. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 05:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Found her myspace page which claimed she was Voluptuous Magazine's Model of the Year for 2000 and 2001.[http://www.myspace.com/viapaxton] However, that's not an independent reliable source for a self-serving notability claim. Magazine is not notable, award is not notable so delete. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 05:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:50, 10 October 2008

Via Paxton

Via Paxton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 10:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Epbr123 (talk) 10:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO. HollyHuntaway (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not sourced, and shows no sign of being notable. Barliman Butterbur (talk) 00:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Last AfD was a clear consensus keep and nothing has changed since then.  Xihr  04:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: Except consensus can change. I'm still wading through the google hits to try to verify her biography. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sure it can, but there's zero evidence that it has here. Continuing to bring it to AfD despite clear consensus keep and no actual evidence of consensus changing whatsoever (that isn't even the argument the nominator makes here) is just trying to do an end run around consensus. If consensus doesn't matter, then we might as well all just pack our bags and go home.  Xihr  01:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Comment: Except prior "consensus" did not provide any evidence and ignored WP:V. Further, WP:PORNBIO was not established, giving a guideline to review the notability of the article. Consensus is changing. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Found her myspace page which claimed she was Voluptuous Magazine's Model of the Year for 2000 and 2001.[1] However, that's not an independent reliable source for a self-serving notability claim. Magazine is not notable, award is not notable so delete. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]