Talk:Bellaire High School (Ohio) and Talk:Christopher Lee (historian): Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
ShepBot (talk | contribs)
m assessing Ohio schools as low importance for WPOH
 
Bhadani (talk | contribs)
tagging as WP Journalism
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography
{{OH-Project|class=Start|importance=low}}
|class=Stub
{{WPSchools|class=Start|importance=|needs-infobox=no}}
|priority=
==Major Edits==
|auto=yes
I did some rather big restructuring of the page to make it more readable, and to wikify it some, but it still needs more work. Particularly, it is seriously lacking in content... especially sections about curriculum, faculty, history of the school, etc. I bulletized the lists that were already there to make them more readable, but some sections may be better off as prose -- feel free to reorganize them if you can. I'll be back to work on this page some more when I have more time to do so. [[User:QuietApocalypse|QuietApocalypse]] 23:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|a&e-work-group=yes

}}
==Fair use rationale for Image:Bellaire.jpg==
{{WikiProject Journalism}}
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
'''[[:Image:Bellaire.jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]].

Please go to [[:Image:Bellaire.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->

[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 07:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:57, 12 October 2008

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconJournalism Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.