Kalevi Wiik: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VolkovBot (talk | contribs)
m r2.5.1) (robot Adding: hu:Kalevi Wiik
No edit summary
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Finnish linguist (1932–2015)}}
{{refimprove|date=June 2013}}
[[File:Kalevi Wiik.jpg|thumb|Kalevi Wiik]]
[[File:Kalevi Wiik.jpg|thumb|Kalevi Wiik]]
'''Kalevi Wiik''' (born 2 August 1932 in [[Turku]]) is a [[professor emeritus]] of [[phonetics]] at the [[University of Turku]], [[Finland]]. He is best known for his controversial hypotheses about the effect of the [[Uralic languages]] on creation of various Indo-European languages in northern Europe, such as Germanic, Slavic, and Baltic languages. Like [[Marija Gimbutas]] before him, he has tried to combine [[archaeology]] with [[linguistics]] in order to locate the origins of European peoples. He also bases much of his hypothetical structures on results of genetics.


'''Kaino Kalevi Wiik''' (2 August 1932, [[Turku]] — 12 September 2015, Turku) was a [[professor]] of [[phonetics]] at the [[University of Turku]], [[Finland]]. He was best known for his controversial hypothesis about the effect of the [[Uralic languages|Uralic]] contact influence on the creation of various [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European]] protolanguages in [[Northern Europe]] such as Germanic, Slavic, and Baltic. He also based much of his hypothetical structures on results of genetics of his time. Ludomir R. Lozny states, "Wiik's controversial ideas are rejected by the majority of the scholarly community, but they have attracted the enormous interest of a wider audience."<ref>{{cite book|last=Lozny|first=Ludomir R.|title=Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past|date=2011|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-1-4419-8224-7|page=156|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HFkueBuO-ucC&pg=PA156 }}</ref>
==Views==
Wiik proposes<ref>[http://www.lib.helsinki.fi/bff/399/wiik.html Europe's oldest language?] - Kalevi Wiik</ref> Indo-European origins in Southeast Europe, using linguistic, genetic, archaeological and anthropological data which he interprets to support his hypotheses. He believes that from 23,000-8000 BC (the last [[Ice Age]]), inhabitation in Europe was in three main regions, [[Last Glacial Maximum|refugio]]s, whose populations then came to divide Europe between themselves. Western 'Basque' Europe and Northern 'Uralic' Europe were inhabited by hunters of large animals which were abundant during that period and spoke languages related respectively to modern Basque and Uralic. The rest of Europe was inhabited by hunters of smaller animals and was fragmented into many smaller unknown languages.


==Hypothesis==
By 5500 BC the extinction of many large species of animals reduced the inhabitants of the Western and Northern regions to hunting small-game. The inhabitants of South-East Europe (hypothesized to have spread from the third, Balkan refugio) had adopted the Neolithic way of life of mixed farming and animal husbandry and were becoming economically more successful. Early farmers diffusing from Greece and the Balkans gave rise to Indo-European, serving as a lingua franca of the inhabitants of region X and displacing or gradually converting linguistically the less successful hunters from the other regions.
Wiik proposed<ref>Wiik, Kalevi: [http://www.lib.helsinki.fi/bff/399/wiik.html Europe's oldest language?] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080609075659/http://www.lib.helsinki.fi/bff/399/wiik.html |date=2008-06-09 }}</ref> Indo-European origins in [[Southeast Europe]] by using linguistic, genetic, archaeological and anthropological data to support his hypotheses. He believed that from 23,000 to 8000 BC (the last [[ice age]]), inhabitation in Europe was in three main regions during the [[Last Glacial Maximum]], and their populations then came to divide Europe between themselves.


Western 'Basque' Europe and Northern 'Uralic' Europe were inhabited by hunters of large animals that were abundant. The people spoke languages related respectively to modern [[Basque language|Basque]] and Uralic. The rest of Europe was inhabited by hunters of smaller animals and fragmented into many smaller unknown languages.
Wiik suggests that at the periphery of the Indo-European language expansion, the Germanic, Baltic, Slavic, Celtic and Iberian languages were formed; these were Indo-European flavored with many elements from the languages of the hunters: Basque and Uralic. He claims the [[Swiderian culture|Post-Swiderian]] people (originating from western Poland) as Finnic-Ugric, and the [[Sami people|Saami]] as migrants from (Magdalenian) Western Europe that changed their original language, probably Basque-like, to a Uralic tongue.


By 5500 BC, the extinction of many large species of animals reduced the inhabitants of [[Western Europe]] and [[Northern Europe]] to hunting small game. The inhabitants of South-East Europe (hypothesised to have spread from the [[Balkans]]) had adopted the Neolithic way of life of mixed farming and animal husbandry and were becoming economically more successful. Early farmers diffusing from [[Greece]] and the Balkans gave rise to Indo-European, serving as a lingua franca of the inhabitants of region and displacing or gradually converting linguistically the less successful hunters from the other regions.
Thus, Wiik proposes that eventually most of Europe was Indo-Europeanized as many of the Basque and Uralic speaking hunters adopted IE languages. Only in the periphery of the European continent, in the Iberian peninsula and in Northeast Europe strong nuclei of hunters apparently adopted farming without being linguistically converted: modern Basque and Finnish speakers are descendants of mostly these early hunters of the Ice Age. Everywhere else, the Indo-European languages which originated in Southeast Europe, have won the upper hand. The key proposition in Wiik's hypothesis is the phonetics-derived idea that the Finnic-Ugric and Basque populations who adopted the fashionable Indo-European language to replace their own, learned their new language a bit badly and used pronunciations in a way familiar to their birth language, which all gave rise to the new languages, German, Slavic and Baltic, as well as Celtic and Iberian. In essence, Wiik suggests that German, Slavic, Baltic, Celtic and Iberian did not emerge from Indoeuropeans themselves, but among the Finnic-Ugric and Proto-Basque populations. This would make the Germanic, Slavic, Baltic, Celtic and Iberian populations genetically as descendants not of Indo-Europeans, but of Finnic-Ugric and Proto-Basque respectively, a claim not fully supported by any genetic evidence.


Wiik suggests that at the periphery of the Indo-European language expansion, the Germanic, Baltic, Slavic, Celtic and Iberian languages were formed; they were Indo-European mixed with many elements from the languages of the hunters: Basque and Uralic. He claims the [[Swiderian culture|Post-Swiderian]] people (originating from western Poland) as Finnic-Ugric, and the [[Sami people|Saami]] as migrants from (Magdalenian) Western Europe who changed their original language, probably Basque-like, to a Uralic tongue.
In “Where Did European Men Come From”<ref>[http://www.jogg.info/41/Wiik.pdf Where Did European Men Come From] - Kalevi Wiik, Journal of Genetic Genealogy, 4:35-85, 2008)</ref> Wiik surveyed Y chromosome variation in Europeans and in accordance with his position that “The men of the Balkan [[Refugium (population biology)|refuge]] were more likely than those of any other to have spoken an early form of the Indo-European language.


Thus, Wiik proposes that eventually most of Europe was Indo-Europeanized as many of the Basque and Uralic speaking hunters adopted Indo-European languages. Only in the periphery of the European continent, in Iberia and in [[Baltic region|Northeastern Europe]] strong nuclei of hunters apparently adopted farming without being linguistically converted: their descendants are Basque- and Finnish-speakers. Everywhere else, the Indo-European languages have won the upper hand. The key proposition in Wiik's hypothesis is the phonetically-derived idea that the Finnic-Ugric and Basque populations who adopted the fashionable Indo-European language replaced their own new language but used pronunciations in a way familiar to their birth language, which all gave rise to the new language. In essence, Wiik suggests that Germanic, Slavic, Baltic, Celtic and [[Iberian language|Iberian]] did not emerge from Indo-Europeans themselves but from the Finnic-Ugric and Proto-Basque populations. That would make the Germanic, Slavic, Baltic, Celtic and Iberian populations genetically as descendants not of Indo-European but of Finnic-Ugric and Proto-Basque respectively, a claim not fully supported by any genetic evidence.
Wiik's views have gained a lot of critique. The possible linguistic substrate in Germanic seems to have nothing in common with Uralic languages, and there is no evidence for Uralic languages ever having been spoken in Central Europe, as opposed to northern and eastern Europe where they attestedly were spoken.

In “Where Did European Men Come From,”<ref>Wiik, Kalevi: [http://www.jogg.info/41/Wiik.pdf Where Did European Men Come From.] ''Journal of Genetic Genealogy'', 4:35-85, 2008)</ref> Wiik surveyed [[Y chromosome]] variation in Europeans and in accordance with his position: "The men of the Balkan [[refugium (population biology)|refuge]] were more likely than those of any other to have spoken an early form of the Indo-European language."

==Criticism==
The possible linguistic substrate in Germanic seems to have nothing in common with Uralic languages, and there is no evidence for Uralic languages ever having been spoken in Central Europe, as opposed to Northern and Eastern Europe, where they were spoken.


{{see also|Germanic substrate hypothesis}}
{{see also|Germanic substrate hypothesis}}


==Footnotes==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


{{Authority control}}
==External links==
* [http://www.wiik.fi/kalevi Wiik's home page]


{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]]. -->
| NAME = Wiik, Kalevi
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION =
| DATE OF BIRTH = 2 August 1932
| PLACE OF BIRTH =
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wiik, Kalevi}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wiik, Kalevi}}
[[Category:1932 births]]
[[Category:1932 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:2015 deaths]]
[[Category:People from Turku]]
[[Category:Academic staff of the University of Turku]]
[[Category:Linguists from Finland]]
[[Category:Phoneticians]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana, 4th Class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana, 4th Class]]

[[da:Kalevi Wiik]]
[[et:Kalevi Wiik]]
[[es:Kalevi Wiik]]
[[hu:Kalevi Wiik]]
[[nn:Kalevi Wiik]]
[[fi:Kalevi Wiik]]
[[sv:Kalevi Wiik]]

Latest revision as of 18:01, 24 July 2023

Kalevi Wiik

Kaino Kalevi Wiik (2 August 1932, Turku — 12 September 2015, Turku) was a professor of phonetics at the University of Turku, Finland. He was best known for his controversial hypothesis about the effect of the Uralic contact influence on the creation of various Indo-European protolanguages in Northern Europe such as Germanic, Slavic, and Baltic. He also based much of his hypothetical structures on results of genetics of his time. Ludomir R. Lozny states, "Wiik's controversial ideas are rejected by the majority of the scholarly community, but they have attracted the enormous interest of a wider audience."[1]

Hypothesis[edit]

Wiik proposed[2] Indo-European origins in Southeast Europe by using linguistic, genetic, archaeological and anthropological data to support his hypotheses. He believed that from 23,000 to 8000 BC (the last ice age), inhabitation in Europe was in three main regions during the Last Glacial Maximum, and their populations then came to divide Europe between themselves.

Western 'Basque' Europe and Northern 'Uralic' Europe were inhabited by hunters of large animals that were abundant. The people spoke languages related respectively to modern Basque and Uralic. The rest of Europe was inhabited by hunters of smaller animals and fragmented into many smaller unknown languages.

By 5500 BC, the extinction of many large species of animals reduced the inhabitants of Western Europe and Northern Europe to hunting small game. The inhabitants of South-East Europe (hypothesised to have spread from the Balkans) had adopted the Neolithic way of life of mixed farming and animal husbandry and were becoming economically more successful. Early farmers diffusing from Greece and the Balkans gave rise to Indo-European, serving as a lingua franca of the inhabitants of region and displacing or gradually converting linguistically the less successful hunters from the other regions.

Wiik suggests that at the periphery of the Indo-European language expansion, the Germanic, Baltic, Slavic, Celtic and Iberian languages were formed; they were Indo-European mixed with many elements from the languages of the hunters: Basque and Uralic. He claims the Post-Swiderian people (originating from western Poland) as Finnic-Ugric, and the Saami as migrants from (Magdalenian) Western Europe who changed their original language, probably Basque-like, to a Uralic tongue.

Thus, Wiik proposes that eventually most of Europe was Indo-Europeanized as many of the Basque and Uralic speaking hunters adopted Indo-European languages. Only in the periphery of the European continent, in Iberia and in Northeastern Europe strong nuclei of hunters apparently adopted farming without being linguistically converted: their descendants are Basque- and Finnish-speakers. Everywhere else, the Indo-European languages have won the upper hand. The key proposition in Wiik's hypothesis is the phonetically-derived idea that the Finnic-Ugric and Basque populations who adopted the fashionable Indo-European language replaced their own new language but used pronunciations in a way familiar to their birth language, which all gave rise to the new language. In essence, Wiik suggests that Germanic, Slavic, Baltic, Celtic and Iberian did not emerge from Indo-Europeans themselves but from the Finnic-Ugric and Proto-Basque populations. That would make the Germanic, Slavic, Baltic, Celtic and Iberian populations genetically as descendants not of Indo-European but of Finnic-Ugric and Proto-Basque respectively, a claim not fully supported by any genetic evidence.

In “Where Did European Men Come From,”[3] Wiik surveyed Y chromosome variation in Europeans and in accordance with his position: "The men of the Balkan refuge were more likely than those of any other to have spoken an early form of the Indo-European language."

Criticism[edit]

The possible linguistic substrate in Germanic seems to have nothing in common with Uralic languages, and there is no evidence for Uralic languages ever having been spoken in Central Europe, as opposed to Northern and Eastern Europe, where they were spoken.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Lozny, Ludomir R. (2011). Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past. Springer. p. 156. ISBN 978-1-4419-8224-7.
  2. ^ Wiik, Kalevi: Europe's oldest language? Archived 2008-06-09 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Wiik, Kalevi: Where Did European Men Come From. Journal of Genetic Genealogy, 4:35-85, 2008)