Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Halo 2

Halo 2

Didn't get a thorough consensus last time I nominated it; I addressed people's concerns, but they didn't return and pass judgement... previous FAC below. Dåvid Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 12:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

previous FAC

Support - looks nice, lots of work done. SamBrozden 12:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, Support as its my nom. Dåvid Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 12:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks excellent. However, can a replacement be found for Media:Halo2cutscene_masterchief_a.jpg‎? IMO it's an exceedingly poor quality image. Qjuad 18:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look. Unfortunately those all come from compressed cinematics from hbo, I had to clean it up some but the black shows most artifacts. I'll see if there's another one, unfortunately thats the only time you see the two together. Dåvid Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 00:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support per SamBrozden; this is a great article. Cliff smith 19:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support as good as the Halo: Combat Evolved one. igordebraga ≠ 22:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Too many video games. --History Fan 00:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And this means... what? Dåvid Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 00:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's a great article- but the subject matter is tired. Theres a huge amount of video-game articles out there. Wow, YAVGA (Yet Another Video Game Article). How about putting all that work into a subject of importance? Nice article, too bad it had to be about a video game. Sue Rangell^{[citation needed]} 00:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can't seriously see how you can possibly justify opposing a well-written article just because its about a subject you don't find interesting... so much for 'don't be a dick'... Dåvid Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 00:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Great article — as igordebraga said, it's as good as, if not better than, Halo: Combat Evolved. One comment: I suggest finding a source for the following line, "The game's Campaign mode has received some criticism, from the lack of Earth-based missions, to dissatisfaction with the abrupt, cliffhanger ending that sets up the sequel, Halo 3." May I remind History Fan and Sue Rangell that "Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the FA Director may ignore it." Cheers, S.D. 01:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]