User talk:Seascic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Protonk (talk | contribs) at 16:11, 25 July 2008 (→‎CSD A7 tag). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User talk:Seascic/talkintro

Who are you?

Looking at your brief contribution history, it is readily apparent that you are not a brand-new user. Your first ten edits included creating a template for your user page discussing CSD issues, building a babelbox for your userpage, finding the RFPP page (twice) to request protection (and then unprotection) of your userpage. Since you don't have e-mail enabled, I cannot contact you. I am not going to decline your unprotection request, but I will not do it until you are a little more forthcoming. Horologium (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll send you an email telling you who I am, since your email feature is enabled. --Seascic T/C 18:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RV

I've Rv'd [some vandalism] to your userpage. Hope I acted correctly! Happy editing... and vandal fighting! Scottydude talk 04:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Services

y is my washington services being deleted? -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonodurham (talkcontribs)

The article was a listing of a place with its phone number and services provided. Wikipedia is not a directory. --Seascic T/C 15:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CSD A7 tag

Application of an A7 tag to Terra Nova (blog) is absurd. There is no possible way to interpret A7 where that article applies. Also, the page was live for 2 minutes before the tag was applied. Please explain how you felt A7 applied to that page. Protonk (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of personal policy I normally do not discuss why I tagged a particular entry for deletion. Please place {{hangon}}> on the article page and state your reasoning on the talk page of the article. An administrator will take your thoughts into consideration. --Seascic T/C 16:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I already have. and as a matter of personal policy you should try to ensure your decisions are at least remotely close to being correct before refusing to answer questions. It is irresponsible to nominate pages blithely and refuse to comment on the nomination. Protonk (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]