User talk:Tropicaljet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phonemonkey (talk | contribs) at 20:57, 20 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Haiku article

Just curious, why annexed rather than occupied? - BalthCat 23:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan annexed Korea by Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910 without occupation. Japan did not war against Korea. Tropicaljet 15:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. - BalthCat 04:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not vandalize the comfort women article please

[[1]] Further vandalism to this or other articles can result in you being banned from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Mackan 18:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the evidence you posted on User talk:Phonemonkey - I've had a quick glance, seems interesting but could you please remind me what this evidence is for? cheers Phonemonkey 12:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I haven't actually disputed that comfort women were paid (at least some of them), I only disputed your claim that most comfort women were from Japan. If you wish to point out the evidence that some were highly paid that's fine by me. However I've re-phrased the first paragraph of the article and I've explained the edit on the talk page. Thanks Phonemonkey 20:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am postulating so grounded in the resarches cited in the artice. They are resuts of their investigations. I am looking for such papers. If you bring those to me, it's welcome. Thanks. Tropicaljet 07:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comfort woman discussion

Thank you for engaging in a civilized debate in the talk page. The aim is to build an informative article which provides some sort of balance to minimise the chance of edit-warring. Since our dear professor Ikeda is being so disruptive and obnoxious, your continued contribution in the current approach is very much welcome. Phonemonkey 20:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]