Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayelaa: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
This is unverifiable. |
→Ayelaa: add comment |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:X!|<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;color:steelblue;">'''X'''</span>]][[User talk:X!|<span style="color:steelblue;"><small>clamation point</small></span>]] 03:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:X!|<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;color:steelblue;">'''X'''</span>]][[User talk:X!|<span style="color:steelblue;"><small>clamation point</small></span>]] 03:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
*The article cites no sources. I couldn't find any sources anywhere that document any such thing by this name, let alone that support any of this content. Of course, transliteration could well be confounding me, but there's no way from the article or its title to determine what else to look for. I couldn't find any clues in the alcoholic drinks section of a Newari phrasebook or a Newari–English dictionary. This is unverifiable. '''Delete'''. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 12:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
*The article cites no sources. I couldn't find any sources anywhere that document any such thing by this name, let alone that support any of this content. Of course, transliteration could well be confounding me, but there's no way from the article or its title to determine what else to look for. I couldn't find any clues in the alcoholic drinks section of a Newari phrasebook or a Newari–English dictionary. This is unverifiable. '''Delete'''. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 12:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete or Rewrite''' I did find some sources, sources as this Nepali tourist site [http://www.eworldtourism.com/nepal/nepal-cuisines.html], and this blog entry on Newa cuisine [http://www.nepal.com/blog/newa-cuisine-the-art-of-serving-water-buffalo]. However, the article needs a rewrite and better sources if it is to remain. Otherwise, I agree that it should be deleted. Perhaps the originating editor, Rohitshrestha, would be interested in undertaking the rewrite, as s/he seems to have some knowledge of the subject matter. [[User:Glane23|Geoff]] ([[User talk:Glane23|talk]]) 09:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:56, 10 October 2008
Ayelaa
- Ayelaa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article does not assert notability using reliable, third-party sources. VG ☎ 02:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 02:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and set redirect to Newa cuisine. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect per above. JJL (talk) 03:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xclamation point 03:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- The article cites no sources. I couldn't find any sources anywhere that document any such thing by this name, let alone that support any of this content. Of course, transliteration could well be confounding me, but there's no way from the article or its title to determine what else to look for. I couldn't find any clues in the alcoholic drinks section of a Newari phrasebook or a Newari–English dictionary. This is unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 12:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or Rewrite I did find some sources, sources as this Nepali tourist site [1], and this blog entry on Newa cuisine [2]. However, the article needs a rewrite and better sources if it is to remain. Otherwise, I agree that it should be deleted. Perhaps the originating editor, Rohitshrestha, would be interested in undertaking the rewrite, as s/he seems to have some knowledge of the subject matter. Geoff (talk) 09:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)