Mark Siddall: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

30 April 2021

  • curprev 02:5402:54, 30 April 2021Drmies talk contribs 24,145 bytes −4,459 so this was nothing but a list of hits in secondary sources. these sources, as every Wikipedia editor knows, should be used to verify parts of the text--not to be listed for their own sake as if we were writing a resume undo
  • curprev 02:4702:47, 30 April 2021Drmies talk contribs 28,604 bytes −3,608 →‎Communicating Science: desperately looking for a single secondary source undo
  • curprev 02:4602:46, 30 April 2021Drmies talk contribs 32,212 bytes −3,829 →‎Research: i don't like blanking an entire section like this--but then, the entire section was written promotionally, and was self-sourced--unacceptable undo
  • curprev 02:4502:45, 30 April 2021Drmies talk contribs 36,041 bytes −49 really undo
  • curprev 02:4502:45, 30 April 2021Drmies talk contribs 36,090 bytes −1,947 prune the lead of fluff, pure fluff, and questionable content and sourcing undo
  • curprev 02:3902:39, 30 April 2021Drmies talk contribs 38,037 bytes +1,275 Reverted 4 edits by Get Shreked U Rapist (talk) undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 02:3802:38, 30 April 2021 (Username or IP removed) 36,762 bytes −860 →‎Career: (REMOVED) The claim that AMNH's graduate school roster does not indicate any graduate student having been under his academic supervision either in the museum's own RGGS program or collaborative program is silly..The student's name was never made public.. How would you know their name & be able to verify it on those sources? Curious... Mark are you editing your own wikipedia page? LOL. Also once again Siddall's website is not a VALID or UNBIASED SOURCE. TRY AGAIN. undo Tags: Reverted references removed
  • curprev 02:3302:33, 30 April 2021 (Username or IP removed) 37,622 bytes −580 →‎Career: (REMOVED) The claim that Siddall was cleared of charges and the graduate student was not under his supervision is not based on reality. There is no real UNBIASED source for this information. The reference is from Siddall's own website and once again is not available online without a webarchiver. Curious? It appears that Siddall published the article and took it down after. Maybe legal trouble? undo Tags: Reverted references removed
  • curprev 02:2902:29, 30 April 2021 (Username or IP removed) 38,202 bytes +188 →‎Career: (REMOVED) The claim that the graduate student who filed a sexual assault complaint did so because Siddall asked to remove his name from a paper is unsubstantiated. The source is weak, coming from Siddall's personal website and not being third party. Re-edited to reflect the one credible source NYTIMES. undo Tags: Reverted possible BLP issue or vandalism
  • curprev 02:0302:03, 30 April 2021 (Username or IP removed)m 38,014 bytes −23 Removed unnecessary in-text citation undo Tag: Reverted

27 April 2021

23 April 2021

20 April 2021

16 April 2021

14 April 2021

13 April 2021

12 April 2021

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)