Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and List of highways numbered 14A (disambiguation): Difference between pages

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
3,734,324 edits
m Create (disambiguation) page redirecting to main dab page
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#Redirect [[List of highways numbered 14A]]
{{moveprotected|small=yes}}
{{Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}
</noinclude>
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 72
|algo = old(72h)
|key = b03db258cd90da0d9e168ffa42a33ae9
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}

=Violations=
:Please place [[#Example|new reports]] {{highlight|at the '''BOTTOM'''}}. If you do not see your report, you can [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=&where=enpedia_3rr search the archives] for it.

<!--
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS.

-->

== [[User:T-1000]] reported by [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]]) (Result: 48 hours) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|People's Republic of China}}. {{3RRV|T-1000}}: Time reported: 03:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=211534829&oldid=211518726] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=211793994&oldid=211793321]
*2nd: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=211789316&oldid=211788468]
*3rd: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=211787742&oldid=211786883]
*4th: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=211776070&oldid=211773883]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:T-1000&diff=42803138&oldid=42011009]

*second offence so longer block. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 06:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:Boodlesthecat]] reported by [[User:Poeticbent]] (Result: no violation) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Ghetto benches}}. {{3RRV|Boodlesthecat}}: Time reported: 18:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghetto_benches&diff=211920807&oldid=211919276 18:19, 12 May 2008] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghetto_benches&diff=prev&oldid=211903502 16:56, 12 May 2008]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghetto_benches&diff=prev&oldid=211903900 16:58, 12 May 2008]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghetto_benches&diff=prev&oldid=211910840 17:33, 12 May 2008]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghetto_benches&diff=211920807&oldid=211919276 18:19, 12 May 2008]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABoodlesthecat&diff=211923258&oldid=211471688 18:31, 12 May 2008]

:There are not 4 reversions above, and if you look at the edit history, it shows [[User:Poeticbent]] instigating an edit war, reverting demonstrably false claims, and reverting offensive claims regarding Jews in Poland. [[User:Boodlesthecat|Boodlesthecat]] <sup>''[[User talk:Boodlesthecat|Meow?]]''</sup> 18:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
::Please refrain from manipulating facts. You have been warned repeatedly against your POV crusade today after you engaged in edit war deleting my contributions and using offensive summaries. --[[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<small><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font></small>]] 19:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

*No violation. #1 & #2 are sequential and count as one revert. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 19:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
**I disagree. Our policy clearly states:
::<small>An editor must not perform more than three reverts, ''in whole or in part'', on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time.</small>
:Reverts #1 & #2 were about different parts of my well balanced single contribution, each time. They were independent of each other. --[[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<small><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font></small>]] 19:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:All Hallow's Wraith]] reported by [[User:emerson7]] (Result: Stale/No vio ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Leslie Jordan}}. {{3RRV|All Hallow's Wraith}}: Time reported: 20:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leslie_Jordan&oldid=201850104] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leslie_Jordan&oldid=211768531]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leslie_Jordan&oldid=211932804]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leslie_Jordan&oldid=211937711]
*4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:All_Hallow%27s_Wraith&oldid=211936324]

over a period of several weeks this user has engaged in warring by systematically reverting my edits on dozens and dozens [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20080411061645&limit=100&contribs=user&target=All+Hallow%27s+Wraith&namespace=0&year=&month= of other articles] with little or no effort discuss. --[[User talk:emerson7|emerson7]] 20:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
:Actually, that makes it 3 reverts, not 4 (for the 4th, User:emerson7 provided the odd url of "http://DIFFS DIFFTIME"). As for this "edit war", the nexus of this dispute is contained in User:emerson7's post to the administrator's noticeboard in April, my reply to it, and that of others, all of which are contained [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive398#All_Hallow.27s_Wraith.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 here]. Previous discussion about this dispute was going on between me and emerson7, and is archived [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emerson7&oldid=204879253#Reverts here]. [[User:All Hallow&#39;s Wraith|All Hallow&#39;s Wraith]] ([[User talk:All Hallow&#39;s Wraith|talk]]) 21:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

::Stale. No violation either. But don't game the system [[User: All Hallow's Wraith]]. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 00:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:Nat]] reported by [[User:GreenJoe]] (Result:no action) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Template:Ont post-secondary}}. {{3RRV|Nat}}: Time reported: 00:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AOnt_post-secondary&diff=211996817&oldid=211995978] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AOnt_post-secondary&diff=211665830&oldid=211538322]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AOnt_post-secondary&diff=211994930&oldid=211992238]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AOnt_post-secondary&diff=211996817&oldid=211995978]


*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANat&diff=211992428&oldid=210112471]

He only reverted 3 times, but he's an admin and should know better. [[User:GreenJoe|GreenJoe]] 00:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
*I'm gonna need a better reason than "he should know better" to block someone for three reverts, especially when his opponent in the dispute has reverted one fewer than that. Suggest heading for [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 00:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
**No offense, but DR doesn't work. He's an admin, yet he reverted 3 times. He really should know better. He failed to use the talk page too. [[User:GreenJoe|GreenJoe]] 00:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

:Every time I give a source which clearly backs my edits, he reverts. I understand that both sides are responsible for their actions in an edit war, and I accept my responsibility in this edit war, however, If you can see, I have given (1) a reasonable rationale each time, (2) provided a source for my edits, (3) the second one was not a full revert as I have provided a citation for my edit. [[User:Nat|'''nat.u''']][[User talk:Nat|'''toronto''']] 00:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
::Good, then block yourself. [[User:GreenJoe|GreenJoe]] 00:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:::To make myself clear, if no action is taken on this, I'll leave Wikipedia for good. [[User:GreenJoe|GreenJoe]] 00:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Blocking someone "because they should know better" strikes me as nothing if not punitive. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 00:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::Along with the fact that 3RR has not really been violated seeing as he did not revert '''more than three times'''. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 00:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
::::::The notice itself says you can be blocked even if you don't revert 4 times. Of course it's punitive, that's the point of 3RR. [[User:GreenJoe|GreenJoe]] 00:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::::No, the point of 3RR is to ''prevent'' edit wars. All [[WP:BLOCK|blocking]] at Wikipedia is supposed to preventative rather than punitive. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 00:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:Red4tribe]] reported by [[User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick]] (Result: blocked two weeks) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation '''''"in spirit"''''' on {{Article|Italian Empire}}. {{3RRV|Red4tribe}}: Time reported: 21:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

User has just come off a week-long block for 3RR violations and pleas from several editors to stop adding self-made maps at [[Dutch Empire]] using his own interpretation of sources, usually consisting of self published websites, and is now at it again at [[Italian Empire]].

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italian_Empire&oldid=205639218 17:05, 14 April 2008]

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italian_Empire&diff=212187836&oldid=211670218 16:12, 13 May 2008]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italian_Empire&diff=next&oldid=212190889 16:33, 13 May 2008]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italian_Empire&diff=212199462&oldid=212197290 16:59, 13 May 2008]

Reversions were done prior to any engagement on the talk page. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AItalian_Empire&diff=212206025&oldid=212198365 17:26, 13 May 2008]

Note that this is not a technical violation of 3RR, more of a breach "in spirit". As he pays no attention to my requests [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThe_Red_Hat_of_Pat_Ferrick&diff=212203057&oldid=210534470], even if a block is not forthcoming, a stern warning should be given on his talk page, where incidentally his previous warnings were deleted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARed4tribe&diff=211961411&oldid=211960403]. <span style="font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">[[User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<font color="red">'''The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick'''</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<font color="blue">'''t'''</font>]]</sup></span> 21:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

:In defense of myself, every time I attempt to reason with the one above me, he becomes completley ignorant, saying whatever reference I post is undreliable. The same has come with this new map. I reverted 2 times, not 3. ([[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] ([[User talk:Red4tribe|talk]]) 21:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC))

::For the second time, after a revert report on this page, Red4tribe has resorted to sockpuppetry to get his maps on WP. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Red4tribe]] <span style="font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">[[User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<font color="red">'''The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick'''</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<font color="blue">'''t'''</font>]]</sup></span> 00:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

:::I was unaware that forgeting to log into your account when attempting to make a quick edit=sockpuppet. Very interesting, so if I forget to log into my account, as I'm sure many others have, they are breaking the rules and thefore should be blocked. ([[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] ([[User talk:Red4tribe|talk]]) 01:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC))
::::Blocked for two weeks - the accidental logout explanation doesn't fly given the timing and was looked upon quite harshly by me. [[user:east718|<small style="background:#fff;border:#800080 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">'''east<big style="color:#090">.</big>718''' ''at 03:19, May 14, 2008''</small>]]

== [[User:Badagnani]] reported by [[User:Navnløs]] (Result: 72 and 48 hour blocks ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|metalhead}}. {{3RRV|Badagnani}}: Time reported: 22:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metalhead&oldid=211932215] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metalhead&diff=211312746&oldid=211312195 19:01, 9 May 2008]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metalhead&diff=211929439&oldid=211929198 19:00, 12 May 2008]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metalhead&diff=211930255&oldid=211929835 19:04, 12 May 2008]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metalhead&diff=211932215&oldid=211930958 19:13, 12 May 2008]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABadagnani&diff=211933049&oldid=211930799 19:18, 12 May 2008]

I left a message on both the [[metalhead]] and [[heavy metal fashion]] articles a while back saying I was going to eventually delete most everything in those articles, because they were both full of original research with perhaps one source each. I proceeded to do this only to have [[User:badagnani]] continually revert me and not seem to understand the situation. At first he would not respond to my numerous warnings and comments. Eventually he did respond and we conversed on my talk page and his. He broke 3RR on both pages. He seems to think deleting information like that is unhelpful to readers who may want to know some information about the subject. I told him that didn't matter and that we can't let people read misionformation either but he didn't seem to get it. I told him I deleted the information I did per [[WP:OR]] as it was all original research and that by reverting me he was also violating [[WP:V]]. It doesn't matter what "truth" is. If it can't be verified and reliably sourced then it shouldn't be there. I would also like t point out that both of those article were filled with blatant information and the article seemed like they were written by children who had no idea what they were talking about. He refused to back down, though. He has at least improved [[heavy metal fashion]] to some degree with some sources but I would kindly ask for a block as he does not seem to understand wikipedia rules and refuses to understand them even after I cited [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:V]] which he was in gross violation of. I wouldn't mind if someone would tell him why he was wron, too, so he understand as he didn't seem to believe me or care. Either reason is dangerous. He needs to understand how wikipedia works. We don't go ahead and leave articles in bad condition so readers can read and try to improve them later. It's the other way around. We can't let readers read such misinformation and need to verify things with reliabel sources ''before'' they appear for readers to see. It seems he has it all backwards and his attitude is dangerous to wikipedia. He would leave horrible and inaccurate articles up just so readers could get a "feel" for the subject or something inane like that. [[User:Navnløs|<b><font color="#0066CC">Blizzard Beast</font></b>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Navnløs|<font color="#666666"><i>$ODIN$</i></font>]]</sup></small> 22:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

:I have blocked Navnlos for 72 hours for breaking [[WP:3RR]] and I have also blocked Badagnani for 48 hours for edit warring. Bad. did not specifically have 4 reverts, but was still edit warring. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 23:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:The Rogue Penguin]] reported by [[User:Muramasa_itachi]] (Result: 48h for both) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Ichigo Kurosaki}}. {{3RRV|The Rogue Penguin}}: Time reported: 7:38 PM, May 13 00:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ichigo_Kurosaki&direction=prev&oldid=212243085 00:29, 14 May 2008] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ichigo_Kurosaki&oldid=212243260 00:33, 14 May 2008]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ichigo_Kurosaki&oldid=212242491 00:29, 14 May 2008]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ichigo_Kurosaki&oldid=212241912 00:26, 14 May 2008]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ichigo_Kurosaki&oldid=211130005 22:17, 8 May 2008]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ichigo_Kurosaki&oldid=212242091 00:27, 14 May 2008]

He's being completely ignorant of the source I'm giving him, claiming it doesn't exist, then goes on to cite original research as a means to trump my argument. He refused to participate in the discussion at the talk page after a while rather childishly. Check the talk page for more. Admittedly, I'm edit warring with him by responding to his reverts, but I'm willing to take whatever punishment is involved with that to have this resolved. Also, understand that I'm offering valid sources, and support of a third opinion, in backing my edits while he has nothing but his own interpretation of a scene to back his. [[User:Muramasa_itachi|<b><span style="color:#40826D">Stardust</span><span style="color:#003153">Dragon</span></b>]] 00:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:Both blocked 48 hours for edit warring and various disruptive tactics. [[user:east718|<small style="background:#fff;border:#ccc 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">'''east<big style="color:#090">.</big>718''' ''at 03:07, May 14, 2008''</small>]]

== [[User:Panel_2008]] reported by [[User:Buffer v2]] (Result: 48 hour block ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Central Europe}}. {{3RRV|Panel_2008}}: Time reported: 05:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLinkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=212276057&oldid=212275075 21:45, May 13, 2008 ]

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=212272288&oldid=211935476 21:20, May 13, 2008]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=212272868&oldid=212272433 21:24, May 13, 2008]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=212273232&oldid=212272970 21:27, May 13, 2008]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=212275075&oldid=212273911 21:39, May 13, 2008]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Panel_2008&diff=206473421&oldid=206450749 06:00, April 18, 2008] + also warned in the comment section of the history page by 221.114.141.220 + countless of others in his talk page - fully aware of the rules.

Also note that this user is connected to a much larger ongoing problem - to keep it short - edit warring on [[Central Europe]] has been going on for months - Panel_2008 is a major party. After weeks of edit warring, '''consensus was reached''' with [[Talk:Central_Europe#Proposal_II|Proposal II]]. He violated consensus and continued edit warring (the only party to do so - the '''only''' problem). This led to mediation - see [[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-04-22_Central_Europe|here]] where the mediator ruled with the majority, and warned Panel_2008 of his actions, and the consequences of it. He has ignored those warnings, and is continuing in the edit warring which leads us here. The mediator as a neutral party has avoided filling out any reports, but has recommended to the rest to fill out [[Wikipedia:AIN|AIN]] or [[Wikipedia:AN3|3RR]] reports. Also, he not only vandalizes pages by ignoring consensus, and through edit warring, but he also attacks other users - as seen in the mediation, and the discussion page of Central Europe.
:Panel 2008 and 221.114.141.220 blocked, EconomistBR warned. [[user:east718|<small style="background:#fff;border:#ff8c00 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">'''east<big style="color:#090">.</big>718''' ''at 05:40, May 14, 2008''</small>]]

== [[User:KrytenKoro]] reported by [[User:Sesshomaru]] (Result: Stale. ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Link (The Legend of Zelda)}}. {{3RRV|KrytenKoro}}: Time reported: 13:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Link_%28The_Legend_of_Zelda%29&diff=212246759&oldid=212243143 00:54, 14 May 2008] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Link_%28The_Legend_of_Zelda%29&diff=prev&oldid=212125992 15:23, 13 May 2008]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Link_%28The_Legend_of_Zelda%29&diff=prev&oldid=212170100 18:50, 13 May 2008]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Link_%28The_Legend_of_Zelda%29&diff=prev&oldid=212215560 22:08, 13 May 2008]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Link_%28The_Legend_of_Zelda%29&diff=212246759&oldid=212243143 00:54, 14 May 2008]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KrytenKoro&diff=212242677&oldid=212213304 00:30, 14 May 2008]

User is plainly uncivil, claims my good faith edits are vandalism, and makes personal attacks while edit warring on the Link page in spite of the discussion there. He goes as far as accusing me of wiki-lawyering and does not listen to my advice on the talk page or in my edit summaries directed to him. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 13:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

:User hasn't reverted since early this morning, ergo, it's stale. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 13:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

::Regardless, he has violated the 3RR within a 24-hour time period and [[WP:Three revert rule|this policy]] agrees with me. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 14:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:::I don't agree that this is stale. 13 hours, especially when the edit warring user's revision is the top revision (thus giving no need to revert, and making the thirteen hours rather meaningless) is not long enough to be considered stale. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 14:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, both of you, blocking is used as a preventative measure to protect the encyclopaedia. It is not used as a "punishment". Please be aware of that. If the user hasn't reverted that article for 13 hours then it's stale. Thanks. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 14:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

:Agree with Scarian here. However, if either user were to resume revert-warring on this article in the near future, I would be inclined to block (or endorse such) regardless of whether the 3-revert limit is technically exceeded. [[User:CIreland|CIreland]] ([[User talk:CIreland|talk]]) 14:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

::[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]] does not, in any way, suggest that "if the user hasn't reverted that article for 13 hours then it's stale". I would like to hear a better arguement than this. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 15:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

:::No one is going to argue with you because you're trying to fight against common sense. Arguing over the spelling of a Japanese word, on the other hand, isn't something to be proud of. Case closed. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 15:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

*'''Comment ''' ... note that Sess (the accuser) has himself made 4 reverts in a 24 hour period on that same article (I tried to help him with a gentle warning but he removed this from his talk page saying he had "acknowledged them") ... also note the weight of reasoning from KrytenKoro compared to that from Sess ... also note the apparent expertise from K versus S ... note also the baiting and accusing tone from Sess almost from the beginning. Technicalities aside, there is only one guilty party here and it is not [[User:KrytenKoro]]. [[User:Abtract|Abtract]] ([[User talk:Abtract|talk]]) 18:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
*{{AN3|s}} [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 18:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::I agree with Scarian and Stifle on the disposition of this case. The only other reasonable option would have been to block both parties, which you probably would not do over a single accent mark. See [[WP:LAME]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:98.221.171.223]] reported by [[User:216.185.5.254]] (Result: Article protected. ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|J Dilla}}. {{3RRV|98.221.171.223}}: Time reported: 18:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J_Dilla&diff=next&oldid=210165197 19:54, 4 May 2008]

This user is continually undoing the improved grammar, spelling, style, and facts to make a point that actually takes away from the article, as you can read in the edit summaries. Whoever it is, he or she refuses to take the matter up privately. I feel that his or her editing or reverting improved Wikipedia articles is not the right outlet.

:Protected for 1 week. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 18:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

:: Unfortunately, it seems the user logged in under [[User:Cosprings|his normal name]] and just reverted it again. If you look at what's being undone, he is taking out all the improvements, primarily because he seems to disagree with the inclusion of just one fact due to it being quoted on a [[blog]]. His edit warring continues, just under another name. [[Special:Contributions/216.185.5.254|216.185.5.254]] ([[User talk:216.185.5.254|talk]]) 19:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:Duck You]] reported by [[User:AgnosticPreachersKid]] (Result: ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|UP Sigma Rho}}. {{3RRV|Duck You}}: Time reported: 06:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=212548170&oldid=212547872 06:44 15 May] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=212512311&oldid=212509955 02:34 15 May]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=next&oldid=212520150 03:34 15 May]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=next&oldid=212540533 05:42 15 May]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=next&oldid=212544093 06:35 15 May]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=next&oldid=212547125 06:42 15 May]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=212548412&oldid=212548170 06:47 15 May]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Duck_You&diff=212548328&oldid=212548020 06:46, May 15]

*Note: [[User:Joseph Solis in Australia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UP_Sigma_Rho&diff=212548919&oldid=212548412 removed] the reference section after [[User:Duck You]]'s latest revert.

== Example ==

<pre>
<!-- COPY FROM BELOW THIS LINE -->

== [[User:NAME_OF_USER]] reported by [[User:YOUR_NAME]] (Result: ) ==

*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|ARTICLE NAME}}. {{3RRV|NAME_OF_USER}}: Time reported: ~~~~~

*Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.
The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time
than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions.
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*2nd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*3rd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]

<!-- COPY FROM ABOVE THIS LINE -->
</pre>

== See also ==

* [[Help:Diff]] or [[Wikipedia:Simplest diff guide]]
* [http://tools.wikimedia.org/~slakr/3rr.php 3RR report helper tool] &ndash; helps simplify diff gathering and reporting. Be sure to remove non-reverts from the report or it may be rejected.

[[ar:ويكيبيديا:سجل خرق قاعدة الثلاثة استرجاعات]]

Revision as of 03:25, 10 October 2008

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=244291290"