User talk:Wwoods

Speedy deletion of Image:Ward.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Ward.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ward.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Kino.jpg

Image:Kino.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Eusebio Francisco Kino bronze by Suzanne Silvercruys.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Eusebio Francisco Kino bronze by Suzanne Silvercruys.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Sabin.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Sabin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Sabin.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

coord parameters

I notice you are on a string of great edits, but occasionally I see an article you've just edited show up in category:Coord template needing repair. For example, this edit you just made assumes that {{coord}} has a scale parameter. It does—kind of—if you use this format. If that seems perplexing, see a related discussion on my talk page. Thanks, —EncMstr (talk) 22:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Oops! :-( —WWoods (talk) 23:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

n|60->n+1|0

Thanks for the clean up! Much appreciated. I just figured out how to get a vim script to do it. —EncMstr (talk) 20:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Mind the roll-over cases, 19->20 and 49->50. (It's rather suspicious that there aren't any |9|60|, |29|60|, etc. It seems like the original data set was rounded off somehow.)

—WWoods (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Of course. The final script is:

%s/0|60|E/1|0|E/
%s/1|60|E/2|0|E/
%s/2|60|E/3|0|E/
%s/3|60|E/4|0|E/
%s/4|60|E/5|0|E/
%s/5|60|E/6|0|E/
%s/6|60|E/7|0|E/
%s/7|60|E/8|0|E/
%s/8|60|E/9|0|E/
%s/0|60|N/1|0|N/
%s/1|60|N/2|0|N/
%s/2|60|N/3|0|N/
%s/3|60|N/4|0|N/
%s/4|60|N/5|0|N/
%s/5|60|N/6|0|N/
%s/6|60|N/7|0|N/
%s/7|60|N/8|0|N/
%s/8|60|N/9|0|N/
%s/|9|60|N/|10|0|N/
%s/|19|60|N/|20|0|N/
%s/|29|60|N/|30|0|N/
%s/|39|60|N/|40|0|N/
%s/|49|60|N/|50|0|N/
%s/|9|60|E/|10|0|E/
%s/|19|60|E/|20|0|E/
%s/|29|60|E/|30|0|E/
%s/|39|60|E/|40|0|E/
%s/|49|60|E/|50|0|E/

Brutish, but effective. —EncMstr (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

55th World Science Fiction Convention

I tagged 55th World Science Fiction Convention as unreferenced and original research. Do you have the references you used to create the first major edit for this article handy? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Uh, aside from those listed in "External links", I don't think there were any. But the third is now a dead link, replaced by http://www.thehugoawards.org/?page_id=23.

—WWoods (talk) 06:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)