Talk:LoanDepot Park: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:10, 10 October 2008

Baseball C‑class

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Florida C‑class

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article name

Shouldn't it be named "New Marlins stadium"? --Rabbethan 00:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. • Freechild'sup? 02:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stadium Deal

Anyone heard about the county meeting yet?Dshibshm (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's still going, I'm watching it as I speak. --Rabbethan 01:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subheading names

Using subheadings like "2005: Marlins stadium hopes dissipate" sounds cutesy and essay-like. They should be more straightforward, such as "2005 setback(s)". • Freechild'sup? 02:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well so be it if it sounds cutesy and essay like that doesnt matter. Those hopes did dissipate and setbacks i mean they had setbacks everyyear so putting dissipate, when their hopes were diminishing that year and looking to relocations gives a more detailed caption.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredler Brave (talk • contribs) 02:46, 21 April 2008

This is wikipedia. It does matter how it sounds like. It should be tagged as such. LostLucidity (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Longivity

This section has been moved from the original Marlins site already but i and others wouldn;t mind if someone would create a page for a section totally talking about the fight for a stadium. Just as long its part of the New Marlins stadium page in a link or in all.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredler Brave (talk • contribs) 01:51, 27 May 2008

Changed the Name

There is no need to have it merged because the page is too long and the page talks about the fight for new stadium in detail and not how the stadium will be build or designs.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredler Brave (talk • contribs) 05:14, 23 July 2008

article moved

I am changing the name of the article to New marlins ballpark. sunshineofyourlove12, 19:34 10 August 2008 (UTC)

You really oughtn't, without first seeking a consensus. Especially since you're seeking to undo something that was decided by consensus. Now, you can argue that the previous sample was too small, and therefore that the question should be brought up again. But to simply revert isn't a good idea. SixFourThree (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)SixFourThree[reply]

History merge

I've merged edits from four titles that this article existed under previously. These articles were repeatedly deleted as recreations of previously-deleted material. Note Talk:Marlins Stadium, reproduced below. Edits from the following pages have been merged here:

Marlins Stadium from 22:33, 9 February 2005 to 20:01, 19 December 2005
New Marlins Ballpark, which was recreated and continually deleted:
- on 03:50, 31 August 2007 to 03:53, 31 August 2007
- on 12:33, 8 September 2007 to 22:19, 18 September 2007
- on 7 November 2007, many times
New Miami Ballpark from 21:24, 9 November 2007 to 05:02, 24 November 2007
New marlins stadium from 17:05, 19 December 2007 to 18:46, 19 December 2007

Cool Hand Luke 02:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk:Marlins Stadium

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 December 2005. The result of the discussion was redirect to Florida Marlins. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Split out History/length

I'm suggesting that the incredibly length history be split out into a separate order and ALSO shortened. It's ridiculously detailed and should be cleaned up, especially the "trial" section. heat_fan1 (talk) 20:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting is premature as the new ballpark does not yet exist (recall WP:CRYSTAL), and as a result cannot have a history. The timeline is much too detailed and much be trimmed as Wikipedia is not a news organisation. There is much too much undue weight in the article already, and the location of the proposed stadium - if it ever gets built - has not been finalised. 147.70.242.41 (talk) 19:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:37, 3 October 2008 edit Tamajared (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,287 edits m moved Talk:Marlins Ballpark to Talk:Marlins ballpark: As the official name of the park has not been decided, the title should be about a general Marlins ballpark ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:10, 10 October 2008 edit undo 147.70.242.41 (talk) →‎Split out History/length: oppose split, favor major surgery here Next edit →
Line 57:		Line 57:

	I'm suggesting that the incredibly length history be split out into a separate order and ALSO shortened. It's ridiculously detailed and should be cleaned up, especially the "trial" section. [[User:Heat fan1\|heat_fan1]] ([[User talk:Heat fan1\|talk]]) 20:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)		I'm suggesting that the incredibly length history be split out into a separate order and ALSO shortened. It's ridiculously detailed and should be cleaned up, especially the "trial" section. [[User:Heat fan1\|heat_fan1]] ([[User talk:Heat fan1\|talk]]) 20:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
			*Splitting is premature as the new ballpark does not yet exist (recall [[WP:CRYSTAL]]), and as a result cannot have a history. The timeline is much too detailed and much be trimmed as [[WP:NOT\|Wikipedia is not a news organisation]]. There is much too much [[WP:UNDUE\|undue weight]] in the article already, and the location of the proposed stadium - if it ever gets built - has not been finalised. [[Special:Contributions/147.70.242.41\|147.70.242.41]] ([[User talk:147.70.242.41\|talk]]) 19:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)