Talk:Publisher's Clearing House

This article seemed pretty negative toward PCH. I marked it for tone because that was the best I could think of; if you think it fits better in another category, please change it. --Leapfrog314 00:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article has since been redone, if anyone ever searches this pass on what you think please :P --Voxeleater 18:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article rea asif is the best e an advertisement. Examples of this include the heading "ABOUT OUR BUSINESS" and blatantly POV statements about the company. Does anyone else agree and think it should be reverted? --madmardigan53 00:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Using perjoratives like tchotchkes and focusing on a past lawsuit indicates a editorial point of view against the company. The article needs to rewritten to show a neutral point of view 24.27.207.98 15:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i have received many letters from PCH and i can tell you this is a scam.

Has anyone ever won a prize? [[[User:Lorryballantyne|Lorryballantyne]] 16:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)]

Sanitized of controversy

User 71.247.102.135 removed some of the controversy surrounding PCH's marketing tactics several revisions ago. Remembering back to what a high-profile news item this issue was at the time, I disagree with the decision to remove this information. Would anyone like to articulate a reason for me not to replace that section? Alki 15:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]