User talk:Secretaria: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Gtadood (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 82: Line 82:


Do you consider the ECW Title World Status? --[[User:Gtadood|Gtadood]] ([[User talk:Gtadood|talk]]) 02:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Do you consider the ECW Title World Status? --[[User:Gtadood|Gtadood]] ([[User talk:Gtadood|talk]]) 02:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

== TNA World Heavyweight Championship ==

There was a consensus made on the talk page to have that box placed in there. Also there is a rule that you are not supposed to date link. It is also overlinking.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 20:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:07, 10 October 2008

User:Wiki alf/Welcome --Alf melmac 10:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I am listing titles reigns as TNA seems them, that is how they should be looked at. I will continue to do so, as that is what TNA recognizes as title reigns are concerned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrhuffman85 (talkcontribs) 14:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


TNA is a wrestling organization that matters, and yes, when you look at WWE you will see in case of Jeff Hardy, he won the IC title on a Saturday taping of Raw, but their title lineage goes from that Monday. When people look up the wrestling title histories, they should see what the "official" history is, that is why you can put that it was taped on such date, but the reign goes from the air date. I will also be editing them back to what they should be. Sting's "official" reign is in fact 11 days, but his actual regin is only 2. I get that, and people will to when they see next to his 11 day reign that it was in fact taped on October 16. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrhuffman85 (talkcontribs) 19:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I could agree with discussing this further. I have my own personal account of all of the TNA titles, crediting past NWA champions as TNA seems them as past TNA champions. It is always difficult when another organizations title is being used. I was just wanting when someone ask a friend how long AJ Styles reign was or something of that nature, if they look it up here to see the "official" reign, thats all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrhuffman85 (talkcontribs) 12:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revoked

Though Angle's reign was revoked, it still occured and was official at the time Angle's win occured and per WP:PW's and Wikipedia's "No retconning" policy, the reign is still listed. Hope this clears it up. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't appear to be the case here though. After looking at numerous reports like this one [1] of the actual Impact episode it appears that Cornette only stripped him of the title to crown an Undisputed TNA Champion. His victory was recognized but due to the Dusty finish, he was stripped of the title. -- bulletproof 3:16 03:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grave1 high.jpg

On what basis are you saying this image is public domain?Geni 01:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. I noticed your input/edits to the TNA World Heavyweight Championship article. There is presently a vote on the discussion page as to the article. Your vote/input would be greatly appreciated. 41.245.156.10 (talk) 15:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Tag Team Champions (WWE)

While are correct that DiBiase Jr.'s ring name does not include the "Jr." suffix, his father is also listed on the page under Ted DiBiase. Without some indication that it's a different person, it's quite confusing, so I believe the "Jr." should remain. Regards, Gavyn Sykes (talk) 01:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Go ahead and make the change if you like. If not, I'll get to it then. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beer Money Inc

This article has already been deleted three times, with this giving you the full information for what has already happened. It will be deleted again, don't recreated it. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Beer Money Inc. (professional wrestling), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Beer Money Inc. (professional wrestling) was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Beer Money Inc. (professional wrestling), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Illustrated

What was your reasoning behind merging the PWI 500 and PWI female 50 in one subsection? Though it looks no worse for the wear, the change now requires a lot of links to be manually fixed due to the section title changes. Anything linked to Pro Wrestling Illustrated#PWI 500 now just links to the top of the Pro Wrestling Illustrated article. I'm not saying your edit is wrong, but unless there is a compelling reason or MOS violation as to why to keep it that way, I would like to revert it. Thanks, Gavyn Sykes (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. No big deal. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Alan04.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Highlander screenshot, per uploader. As a copyright violation, Image:Alan04.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Alan04.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Alan04.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Alan04.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Alan04.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 02:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:H077-06.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:H077-06.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also Image:Fire high.jpg, Image:Yngrach.jpg, Image:Livres zealot.jpg, Image:Kronos14.jpg, Image:Nick2raven.jpg, Image:Roman high.jpg. --dave pape (talk) 03:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And Image:Maurice high.jpg, Image:Horton high.jpg, Image:Methos-gathering.jpg, Image:Fitz18.jpg, Image:Kronos09.jpg, Image:Juan02.jpg, Image:Juan01.jpg. --dave pape (talk) 03:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image permission problem with Image:J129 AT-1-.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:J129 AT-1-.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Andrew01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Say

Do you consider the ECW Title World Status? --Gtadood (talk) 02:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TNA World Heavyweight Championship

There was a consensus made on the talk page to have that box placed in there. Also there is a rule that you are not supposed to date link. It is also overlinking.--WillC 20:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]