Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 October 4

October 4

Image:Gazzareth.jpg

The user uploaded this image back in 2005 (he is now long absent) without any licensing info. A user applied the GFDL-presumed template to the image. The uploader was advised on his talk page to add licensing info. The uploader added the following "I created this image myself in photoshop it is copyrighted to myself and i give permission to wikipedia to use it under licence" which I think makes the image non-free. Non-free images can not be used on User: pages, and it is not being used in any meaningful way on that user page, just as decoration. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Launny Aquatic Centre.JPG

I doubt this design plan (which is no doubt on display at the Council Chambers for the rate payers to view which is required by law but doesn't make it free works) would be in the public domain nor would it be covered by the Freedom of Panorama in Australia Bidgee (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:EVHS01.jpg

See below.

Image:EVHS02.jpg

See below.

Image:EVHS03.jpg

Uploaded by serial copyright violator (and probable sock of PoliticianTexas) User:LamyQ; it's hard to believe that these three aren't free when every other image he's uploaded has been a copyvio. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 13:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Clarification: User:LamyQ is so far only an accused sock. See the case here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PoliticianTexas (2nd). See a history of images from User:PoliticianTexas and his suspected socks here: User talk:DoriSmith/PolTXimgs. Based on this history I agree that these are probably unfree images. --Uncia (talk) 13:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)