User talk:88.108.206.158

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CanadianLinuxUser (talk | contribs) at 21:29, 26 August 2008 (Message re. Collings and Herrin (podcast) (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Collings and Herrin (podcast) worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 23:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Collings and Herrin (podcast) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]r] for testing. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 23:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Collings and Herrin (podcast). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - Toon05 23:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last cunting. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Collings and Herrin (podcast). DougsTech (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry everyone, Wikipedia are cocks


 '
  '
   '
    '
    //  7
   (_,_/\
    \    \
     \    \
     _\    \__
    (   \     )
     \___\___/


You have been not temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vampirism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make cockstructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexfcockface42 23:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Collings and Herrin (podcast) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 21:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]