Talk:The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:08, 9 May 2008

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Disney Unassessed

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Page move

This page was moved from "The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996 animated film)" to "The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996 film)" as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films). As no other film entitled "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" was released in 1996, no further disambiguation is necessary. -- Ianblair23 (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia Note

* Slow down the movie during the number Topsy Turvy, near the very end, when Clopin is presenting Quasi. When he goes "Tooopsy tuuuurvy!" if you slow it down enough, you can see him turn his head to the side for a split second. His face turns into that of a wolf and he grins slyly. It is very quick.

I didn't believe this at all when I first read it, and after going through the film frame by frame, I can safely say it's vandalism. Deleted now. Nqnpipnr 22:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that original research on your part? ;-) — Mütze 11:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pumbaa

I have this on video and i did not see Pumbaa in the song "Out There". {172.209.243.209 12:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Songs and characters!!!!! COME ON!!!!!

Come now, don't make this film look bad! Some of this movies characters needs articles. Also Hellfire is not the only famous song in this film, you know. As soon as I've heard what the rest of you think I'll start editing! Okay? 85.228.165.63 (talk) 21:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What edits are you proposing to make? We can't really offer our thoughts unless we know more about what you want to do than "omg songs and characters," since both of those are already represented in the article. In general, the policy is to be bold, though, so why not go ahead and make your edits and then see what other editors have to say about them? Chaoticfluffy (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that other characters than Esmeralda and Frollo deserves their own articles. The gargoyles were invented by Disney and, as far as I'm concerned, they're popular enough for having an article. Also some other songs than Hellfire and Out there became popular, I think, and they should have articles IMO 85.228.165.63 (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:40, 8 May 2008 edit Fluffernutter (talk \| contribs) Administrators 41,559 edits →‎Songs and characters!!!!! COME ON!!!!! ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:08, 9 May 2008 edit undo 85.228.165.63 (talk) →‎Songs and characters!!!!! COME ON!!!!! Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:What edits are you proposing to make? We can't really offer our thoughts unless we know more about what you want to do than "omg songs and characters," since both of those are already represented in the article. In general, the policy is to [[Wikipedia:Be_bold\|be bold]], though, so why not go ahead and make your edits and then see what other editors have to say about them? [[User:Chaoticfluffy\|Chaoticfluffy]] ([[User talk:Chaoticfluffy\|talk]]) 21:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)		:What edits are you proposing to make? We can't really offer our thoughts unless we know more about what you want to do than "omg songs and characters," since both of those are already represented in the article. In general, the policy is to [[Wikipedia:Be_bold\|be bold]], though, so why not go ahead and make your edits and then see what other editors have to say about them? [[User:Chaoticfluffy\|Chaoticfluffy]] ([[User talk:Chaoticfluffy\|talk]]) 21:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
			:I was thinking that other characters than Esmeralda and Frollo deserves their own articles. The gargoyles were invented by Disney and, as far as I'm concerned, they're popular enough for having an article. Also some other songs than Hellfire and Out there became popular, I think, and they should have articles IMO [[Special:Contributions/85.228.165.63\|85.228.165.63]] ([[User talk:85.228.165.63\|talk]]) 15:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)