Siege of Jadotville: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 02:4802:48, 21 May 2024‎ Carius talk contribs‎ 46,832 bytes −394‎ Removed dubious claims about only 3 killed and 8 wounded among the attacking force with such claims having only one questionable 1963 Congolese reference: better sourcing is needed if such claims are to be taken seriously undo

curprev 11:1211:12, 10 May 2024‎ Jengeldk talk contribs‎ m 47,224 bytes +4‎ →‎Congo Crisis: Made a link to Moise Tshombe undo

curprev 21:0221:02, 15 April 2024‎ Goombah talk contribs‎ m 47,220 bytes −3‎ →‎Background undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

curprev 23:1923:19, 7 April 2024‎ LittleTok talk contribs‎ m 47,288 bytes −14‎ Fix grammar mistake of saying "succession" instead of "secession" undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 18:3518:35, 28 March 2024‎ 76.11.71.70 talk‎ 47,294 bytes +26‎ →‎Congo Crisis: Linking the mention of the Fouga Magister to their page. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 08:4208:42, 23 January 2024‎ Tan Khaerr talk contribs‎ 31,156 bytes +916‎ +Quotes. This estimate of 300 casualties caused by only 150 men (!), claimed by the Irish politics, is highly suspect. undo

curprev 16:5716:57, 20 January 2024‎ Dormskirk talk contribs‎ 30,240 bytes −262‎ this seems very dubious to me: I agree that it needs a quotation before it is included undo Tag: Manual revert
curprev 16:5316:53, 20 January 2024‎ Guliolopez talk contribs‎ 30,502 bytes +174‎ Refs and ref syntax. Copyedits. Request quotation. (Where is this on page 142 please? I cannot see it? Can we have a quote? For verification? Just as we have for the other/higher number?) undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 16:4716:47, 20 January 2024‎ Guliolopez talk contribs‎ 30,328 bytes −133‎ I don't have access to this French-language source (published within a year or so of the events), but there are no modern sources which support the suggestion that there were only 10 casualties (total) among Katangese forces. And, in the context of the body and the other sources, this seems odd and dubious (in the extreme). Please take it to talk. undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 07:1707:17, 20 January 2024‎ Tan Khaerr talk contribs‎ 30,461 bytes +221‎ Undid revision 1197308343 by Dormskirk (talk) sourced passage undo Tags: Undo Reverted