Talk:Mycenaean Greek: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''The publication of the Thebes tablets (L. Godart and A. Sacconi, 2002) was long anticipated, and their actual content was rather disappointing compared to what had been hinted at by the editors in the previous years.'' This is less than informative for the Wikipedia reader. Anyone? --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 05:24, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
''The publication of the Thebes tablets (L. Godart and A. Sacconi, 2002) was long anticipated, and their actual content was rather disappointing compared to what had been hinted at by the editors in the previous years.'' This is less than informative for the Wikipedia reader. Anyone? --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 05:24, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
||
:um, yeah, it was supposed to summarize [[Thebes tablets]]. Change it as you see fit. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|('''ᛏ'''</small>)]] 08:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
:um, yeah, it was supposed to summarize [[Thebes tablets]]. Change it as you see fit. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|('''ᛏ'''</small>)]] 08:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
||
:Wish you would. I'm not competent. I haven't even read the stuff ''about'' the Thebes tablets. I'll see if I can find some Internet references to add there, but I wish you'd just give us "50 words or less." --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 08:50, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:50, 16 March 2005
The publication of the Thebes tablets (L. Godart and A. Sacconi, 2002) was long anticipated, and their actual content was rather disappointing compared to what had been hinted at by the editors in the previous years. This is less than informative for the Wikipedia reader. Anyone? --Wetman 05:24, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- um, yeah, it was supposed to summarize Thebes tablets. Change it as you see fit. dab (ᛏ) 08:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Wish you would. I'm not competent. I haven't even read the stuff about the Thebes tablets. I'll see if I can find some Internet references to add there, but I wish you'd just give us "50 words or less." --Wetman 08:50, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)