User talk:SlamDiego

; Orc Hives
	Some messages may be found
	· in the first orc hive,
	· in the second orc hive,
	· in the third orc hive,
	· in the fourth orc hive,
	· in the fifth orc hive,
	· in the sixth orc hive,
	· in the seventh orc hive,
	· in the eighth orc hive,
	· in the ninth orc hive,
	· in the tenth orc hive,
	· in the eleventh orc hive,
	· in the twelfth orc hive,
	· in the unlucky orc hive,
	· in the fourteenth orc hive,
	· in the fifteenth orc hive,
	· in the sixteenth orc hive,
	· in the seventeenth orc hive, or
	· in the eighteenth orc hive.

Contents

This editor has too many irons in the fire, and may be suddenly inactive on Wikipedia for indeterminate intervals.

Click the “+” tab or this sentence to start a new discussion.

User:SlamDiego/E. M. Washington

Someone was wondering about something in your userspace earlier - Wikipedia:Help desk#About this article - is it fake?. I think the main question's been resolved, but you might want to decategorize your userspace draft to avoid confusion! Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 12:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented out the categories on that page because those categories are meant to be for mainspace articles only - when you put the article back, you remove those comment lines out to recategorise them. x42bn6 Talk Mess 12:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I just didn't have my brain in gear on that one! —SlamDiego_←T 15:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input at Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marginalism

I assume you didn't mean to blank the page. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True. Indeed, I did not blank the page. I simply used the undo function on two minor leg-lift edits; a bug in the software blanked the page. —SlamDiego_←T 03:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marginalism, role and leg-lift

My concern with the spelling of the word "role" as "rôle" has nothing to do with you or your beliefs about the english language. My concern is that spelling role as rôle is confusing to people who have never encountered it. "rôle" is the french spelling whereas "role" is the english spelling. The article on marginalism is in english, not french. Also, I have no idea what a leg-lift edit is. --Klaser (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in the discussion that you claim to have read, “rôle” is English, and the preferred orthography in some authoritative dictionaries.

If you don't know what a leg-lift edit is, then don't claim in your summaries to be reverting a leg-lift edit.

—SlamDiego_←T 21:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I have seen your remark about Barzilai. I did not know the criticism by Krantz (not a newcomer...). Seems interesting, independently of the reasons that motivated it! --Fioravante Patrone en (talk) 06:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me, too. Thanks for the note. I had hunted down the Krantz bit on my own and alternately grinned and cringed reading it. I'm not letting current arguments bother me, in any case.Cretog8 (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD closure

Thanks for letting me know - for some reason, every time I edit the page trying to fix that, yet more sections are chopped off... Am trying to do it again in stages, using "cut and paste" from other open tabs. Any ideas? Bencherlite ^Talk 00:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fear not. In the end, closing the browser and restarting proved more effective than refreshing my cache or manual edits. I'll have to watch that script in future. Thanks again. Bencherlite ^Talk 00:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because no one seems to have told you…

There's an active (though likely to be speedy closed) Request for username comments with your name on it. Just thought you ought to know. Adam McCormick (talk) 20:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That's actually a response to Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Grazon. —SlamDiego_←T 20:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought as much, you may also want to have a look here Adam McCormick (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruud Binnekamp format fix

Yeah, sorry about that. Conversation rules still aren't entirely clear to me, possibly because there are no hard-and-fast rules? A well.Cretog8 (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! As you were commenting here I was commenting to your talk page. (I'll check there for any replies, though I don't think that my comment demands a reply.) —SlamDiego_←T 21:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]