Talk:Zapatista History

Sadly the Zapatista entry has reached the point of having been edited by so many opinionated individuals that it no longer provides much in the way of impartial information. Naturally this is a topic that will draw much enthusiasm and passion, but to present it as it stands does a disservice to all.

Sadly the Modeern Zapatista entry has reached the point of having been edited by so many opinionated individuals that it no longer provides much in the way of impartial information. Naturally this is a topic that will draw much enthusiasm and passion, but to present it as it stands does a disservice to all.

Clean Up

As info on both incarnations of the Zapatistas is well covered elsewhere, I thought this should be a souped-up disambiguation page. As such, I rewrote it slightly, removing not-verifiable stuff, and removing the stub tag (any developments would be redundant).

However, a string of IP addresses has re-added stuff, added more stuff, put in an enormous string of links, and re-stubbed it. Unfortunately, I haven't got the time to edit Wikipedia normally, never mind re-fiddle about with this article. Grayum 15:53, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I propose an general overhaul of the entire page, as some of the information is ambigous or inaccurate. Along with this edit would come scources to verify the information. A year and a half ago I visited the Zapatistas in Chiapas, as well as wrote my undergrad thesis on them. Theo Wood, October 8, 2005

Excellent, go for it! You might like to check out the linked pages on the two incarnations, so nothing gets duplicated too much. If you've visited them thats cool. You might want to create an account, from the link in the top right hand corner. Grayum 13:41, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just cleaned up the article myself before looking a the discussion page. Sorry about that, I thought I had already looked and found nothing substantive. Feel free to revert if my changes are off target. Draeco 13:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should just be a redirect page, no more. regards 84.164.80.235 09:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]