Talk:University of Belgrano

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Belgrano article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve University of Belgrano, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

The poor quality of the institution is an issue that should be in the article.--PortoPuto 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the alleged university quality, Wikipedia is NOT the best place to include that kind of statements. Also your username can be considered offensive, so please change it or you'll blocked. --COA 22:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it should be written in the article.

By the way, I've changed my username as you requested. --PortoPuto 22:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? Your username looks exactly the same. This is your last warning. Please stop vandalizing or you'll be blocked. --COA 22:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quality discussion

Just saying the quality is bad, or "some people say that" is a opinion, and uncited and unverifable opinions are discouraged. However, if you can find a source that describes the universtiy in this way, then that's fine. The difference is between

"Some people say X is bad" - claim has no source, can't be verified - and see Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words
"Paper X[link] described X as bad" - verifible, source is cited and named.

Hope that helps. MartinRe 00:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this before editing the article

Recent vandalism in this article has been unstoppable, please discuss changes here before editing the article. All edits with no consensus will be considered vandalism and removed without any advise. Thanks. --OneEuropeanHeart 22:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]