No RfA spam please. Everybody else: Welcome.
RfA spam received since I set up above notice: 1|
I have no particular agenda on how to handle user talk (except for this simple rule). I'm confident we'll figure a way to get the essential points across to each other anyway. Chances are, I'll reply on your talk page and watch it for a reply from you. If you'd rather put it here to avoid a fragmented discussion, you're welcome to copy anything over together with your latest reply. Also, please don't hold back: Nobody is perfect and I'm grateful for any constructive criticism and advice you may have with regard to specific edits or my conduct in general.
click here to leave a message
(please remember to provide a subject/headline and to sign your post with four tildes: ~~~~ )
- Huh? I don't see anything wrong with your talk page. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 00:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, I see. "No RfA Spam." All right, I'll respect your wishes.... Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 00:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you made a comment about being confused by the logic of my latest comment on the issue of the depiction of the MP5 in the insignia of the Red Army Faction. I thought my logic was clear, but I can simplify it. My logic simply put it: has the use of the MP5 in the Red Army Factions insignia affected the MP5? If so, how? That is the general standard for deciding if something of this nature is trivial or significant to the firearm. My apologies for any confusion caused by my last comment.--LWF (talk) 03:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It certainly is not. I am just suggesting that the material that Byrne produces be verified to ensure that it is not a forgery.--Mantanmoreland (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, I tend to agree that the PB talk page might not be an appropriate venue to raise the issue.--Mantanmoreland (talk) 15:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please log in if you have an account. At any rate, please do not continue to revert as you did here. User:Dorftrottel 14:53, February 18, 2008
You left a message on my IP's talk page but I am on dialup and my IP changes, quoting you above. My reply below:
Why not? Does WP:NPA not apply to Mantanmoreland? The blog he linked to also is an attack and outing site. He was harassing Patrick Byrne who has a wikipedia article. I'm also doing it on dialup and not logged in so everyone can see I am not in Utah and not wordbomb or anyone else. 4.242.132.121 (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Big Brother 9 and live feeds
Thanks for your response on the Big Brother 9 page. I really think that ownership is hurting the article. Oh and if this is RFA spam, then I am sorry since I have no CLUE what RFA spam is.
