User talk:Tropicaljet: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Phonemonkey (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 17: Line 17:
==comfort woman discussion==
==comfort woman discussion==
Thank you for engaging in a civilized debate in the talk page. The aim is to build an informative article which provides some sort of balance to minimise the chance of edit-warring. Since our dear professor Ikeda is being so disruptive and obnoxious, ''your'' continued contribution in the current approach is very much welcome. [[User:Phonemonkey|Phonemonkey]] 20:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for engaging in a civilized debate in the talk page. The aim is to build an informative article which provides some sort of balance to minimise the chance of edit-warring. Since our dear professor Ikeda is being so disruptive and obnoxious, ''your'' continued contribution in the current approach is very much welcome. [[User:Phonemonkey|Phonemonkey]] 20:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

:Ikeda is every inch a authority of this affair. I think you should hold him in esteem some more, and should not do personal attack. [[User:Tropicaljet|Tropicaljet]] 03:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:26, 23 March 2007

Haiku article[edit]

Just curious, why annexed rather than occupied? - BalthCat 23:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan annexed Korea by Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910 without occupation. Japan did not war against Korea. Tropicaljet 15:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. - BalthCat 04:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not vandalize the comfort women article please[edit]

[[1]] Further vandalism to this or other articles can result in you being banned from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Mackan 18:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the evidence you posted on User talk:Phonemonkey - I've had a quick glance, seems interesting but could you please remind me what this evidence is for? cheers Phonemonkey 12:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I haven't actually disputed that comfort women were paid (at least some of them), I only disputed your claim that most comfort women were from Japan. If you wish to point out the evidence that some were highly paid that's fine by me. However I've re-phrased the first paragraph of the article and I've explained the edit on the talk page. Thanks Phonemonkey 20:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am postulating so grounded in the resarches cited in the artice. They are resuts of their investigations. I am looking for such papers. If you bring those to me, it's welcome. Thanks. Tropicaljet 07:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comfort woman discussion[edit]

Thank you for engaging in a civilized debate in the talk page. The aim is to build an informative article which provides some sort of balance to minimise the chance of edit-warring. Since our dear professor Ikeda is being so disruptive and obnoxious, your continued contribution in the current approach is very much welcome. Phonemonkey 20:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ikeda is every inch a authority of this affair. I think you should hold him in esteem some more, and should not do personal attack. Tropicaljet 03:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]