Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Satter: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:21, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g4 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Satter. NawlinWiki 21:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Satter[edit]

Delete. -- Vanity page. Individual is not widely known. Yaf 02:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because it is a duplicate of the nominated article:

Include in the list the page Michael Satter SmartGuy 19:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable [1].--Paloma Walker 03:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not particularly notable - just a regular guy doing a regular good job. His photo should go from National Institute of Corrections as well because he is not notable in that context. In fact, if you look here his photo has been plastered everywhere! Bridgeplayer 04:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:N /Blaxthos 05:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does anone want to knw im? not notable --Zedco 10:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, fails BIO/N, vanity page. - Denny 13:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with fire, entirely the work of single purpose accounts, looks so much like vanispamcruftisement that it's hard to reach any other conclusion. Guy (Help!) 14:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom SmartGuy 15:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - we have User:Dr.Shartell, User:Gregwolen and User:Seaninwashington all promoting the same guy with similar text and pictures! Bridgeplayer 16:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the obvious reason jamesgibbon 18:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete {{db-repost}} per all the reasons from the first time --Onorem 19:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment and maybe look into any other users created by NateinFlorida (talk · contribs)...I mean Gregwolen (talk · contribs)...I mean Seaninwashington (talk · contribs)...I mean Carlostexas (talk · contribs)...I mean Gregsteres (talk · contribs)...I mean Timwiller (talk · contribs)...I mean Glenwolling (talk · contribs)...--Onorem 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - and don't forget Parkermax (talk · contribs) (Satter is also a rapper it seems!) Bridgeplayer 19:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - well spotted; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Satter refers. I have tagged all three pages for speedy. Bridgeplayer 19:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment and don't forget Billrusslen (talk · contribs) who inserted a Michael Satter reference into a picture caption (vandalism) in the Police article. Yaf 20:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is Joeinalabama (talk · contribs) listed here yet? --Onorem 21:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burnsvillemike (talk · contribs) & DeaninDetroit (talk · contribs)...yawn --Onorem 21:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NickOwnes (talk · contribs) - OK, I'm just going to stop looking for connections. I hoping there's enough here to justify a CheckUser... --Onorem 21:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
66.41.155.45 (talk · contribs) - Another one... WP:RFCU anyone? Yaf 21:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''Speedy delete''' g4 per [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Satter]]. [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] 21:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 ===[[Mike Satter]]===
+:{{la|Mike Satter}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Satter|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 March 21#{{anchorencode:Mike Satter}}|View log]])</noinclude>
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
-:{{la|Mike Satter}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Satter|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 March 21#{{anchorencode:Mike Satter}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 *'''Delete'''. -- Vanity page.  Individual is not widely known. [[User:Yaf|Yaf]] 02:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+I am also nominating the following related pages because it is a duplicate of the nominated article:
+:{{la|Michael (Mike) Satter}} [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 17:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+Include in the list the page [[Michael Satter]] [[User:SmartGuy|SmartGuy]] 19:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' non notable [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Mike+Satter%22&btnG=Search].--[[User:Paloma Walker|Paloma Walker]] 03:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' as not particularly notable - just a regular guy doing a regular good job. Afterwards, his photo should go from [[National Institute of Corrections]] as well because he is not notable in that context. [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 04:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as not particularly notable - just a regular guy doing a regular good job. His photo should go from [[National Institute of Corrections]] as well because he is not notable in that context. In fact, if you look [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gregwolen here] his photo has been plastered everywhere! [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 04:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' [[WP:N]] /[[User:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] 05:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' does anone want to knw im? not notable --[[User:Zedco|Zedco]] 10:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' Non-notable, fails BIO/N, vanity page. - [[User_talk:DennyColt|Denny]] 13:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' with fire, entirely the work of [[WP:SPA|single purpose accounts]], looks so much like [[WP:VSCA|vanispamcruftisement]] that it's hard to reach any other conclusion. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 14:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' per nom [[User:SmartGuy|SmartGuy]] 15:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' - we have [[User:Dr.Shartell]], [[User:Gregwolen]] and  [[User:Seaninwashington]] all promoting the same guy with similar text and pictures! [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 16:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' for the obvious reason [[User:Jamesgibbon|<span style="color:green">james</span><span style="color: blue">gibbon</span>]] 18:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+* '''Speedy Delete''' <nowiki>{{db-repost}}</nowiki> per all the reasons from the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Satter|first time]] --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]] 19:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:*'''Comment''' and maybe look into any other users created by {{User|NateinFlorida}}...I mean {{User|Gregwolen}}...I mean {{User|Seaninwashington}}...I mean {{User|Carlostexas}}...I mean {{User|Gregsteres}}...I mean {{User|Timwiller}}...I mean {{User|Glenwolling}}...--[[User:Onorem|Onorem]] 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+::*'''Comment''' - and don't forget {{User|Parkermax}} (Satter is also a rapper it seems!) [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 19:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' - well spotted; [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Satter]] refers. I have tagged all three pages for speedy. [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] 19:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:*'''Comment''' and don't forget {{User|Billrusslen}} who inserted a Michael Satter reference into a picture caption (vandalism) in the Police article. [[User:Yaf|Yaf]] 20:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:*'''Comment''' Is {{User|Joeinalabama}} listed here yet? --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]] 21:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+::*{{User|Burnsvillemike}} & {{User|DeaninDetroit}}...yawn --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]] 21:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:::*{{User|NickOwnes}} - OK, I'm just going to stop looking for connections.  I hoping there's enough here to justify a CheckUser... --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]] 21:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:::*{{User|66.41.155.45}} - Another one...  [[WP:RFCU]] anyone?  [[User:Yaf|Yaf]] 21:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>