Template:AfC submission/declined: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
remove clock picture
replacing template with template:afc submission2 which has more functionality
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#ifeq: {{{1}}}| accepted | |
{{NOINDEX}}
{{NOINDEX}}
{{{!}} class="messagebox plainlinks" id="inuse" style="border: 1px solid #5A8261; background-color: #ffcece;"
{| class="messagebox plainlinks" id="inuse" style="border: 1px solid #5A8261; background-color: #ffcece;"
|-
{{!}}-
{{!}} style="width: 70px" {{!}} [[Image:AFC-Logo.png{{!}}center{{!}}50px]]
| style="width: 70px" | [[Image:Crystal_Clear_app_clock.svg|center|50px]]<BR>[[Image:AFC-Logo.png|center|50px]]
{{!}}<span style="font-size: 115%">'''Review completed.''' </span><br />
|<span style="font-size: 115%">'''Review completed.''' </span><br />
'''This request has been declined. The reason can be seen at the bottom.'''
'''This request has been declined. {{#switch:{{lc:{{{1}}}}}
|source=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|not reliable]] per the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. Please provide '''reputable, third-party''' sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the [[WP:Verifiability|verifiability]] of the submission as well as its [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]].
|v=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|not reliable]] per the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. Please provide '''reputable, third-party''' sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the [[WP:Verifiability|verifiability]] of the submission as well as its [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]].
|bio=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the [[WP:N|importance or significance]] of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria A7]] and/or [[WP:BIO|guidelines on biographies]]. Please provide more information on why the person or group is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, and cite [[WP:RS|reliable]], published third-party sources, so that the information in the article is [[WP:V|verifiable]]. Thank you.
|nn=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria (A7)]] and/or [[WP:N|guidelines on notability]]. Please provide more information on why the subject is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
|web=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria A7]] and/or [[WP:WEB|guidelines on web sites]]. Please provide more information on why the web site is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
|corp=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria A7]] and/or [[WP:CORP|guidelines on organizations and companies]]. Please provide more information on why the organization is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
|music=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria A7]] and/or [[WP:MUSIC|guidelines on musical artists]]. Please provide more information on why this musical artist is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
|m=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria A7]] and/or [[WP:MUSIC|guidelines on musical artists]]. Please provide more information on why this musical artist is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
|band=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the [[WP:SPEEDY#A7|speedy deletion criteria A7]] and/or [[WP:MUSIC|guidelines on musical artists]]. Please provide more information on why this musical artist is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
|dict=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]] and [[WP:DICT|not a dictionary]]. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should ''begin'' with a good definition, but expand on the subject. Please try creating an article at [[wikt:Main Page|Wiktionary]] instead.
|d=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]] and [[WP:DICT|not a dictionary]]. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should ''begin'' with a good definition, but expand on the subject. Please try creating an article at [[wikt:Main Page|Wiktionary]] instead.
|context=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see [[Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles|tips]] on how to better format your article.
|cv=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:{{#ifeq:{{{2|}}}|{{{3}}}||This article appears to be taken from {{{2}}}.}} We cannot accept [[WP:Copyrights|copyrighted]] content taken from web sites or printed sources. Note that copyright protection is granted to all works automatically, whether it is asserted or not. Unless stated otherwise, assume that most content on the internet is copyrighted and not suitable for Wikipedia. Please write in your own words, and in continuous prose.
|cv-n=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:{{#ifeq:{{{2|}}}|{{{3}}}||This article appears to be taken from {{{2}}}.}} We cannot accept [[WP:Copyrights|copyrighted]] content taken from web sites or printed sources. Note that copyright protection is granted to all works automatically, whether it is asserted or not. Unless stated otherwise, assume that most content on the internet is copyrighted and not suitable for Wikipedia. Please write in your own words, and in continuous prose.
|blank=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:We cannot accept blank suggestions. Please consider submitting to [[Wikipedia:Requested articles]] instead.
|empty=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:We cannot accept blank suggestions. Please consider submitting to [[Wikipedia:Requested articles]] instead.
|adv=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:I'm sorry, but your article appears to read more like an [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#SOAPBOX|advertisement]] than an entry in an encyclopedia. If you still feel that this subject is appropriate for Wikipedia, please rewrite your proposed article in the form of an encyclopedia entry. Encyclopedia entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of published, [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|sources]], not just to materials produced by the creator of the item being discussed.
|advert=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:I'm sorry, but your article appears to read more like an [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#SOAPBOX|advertisement]] than an entry in an encyclopedia. If you still feel that this subject is appropriate for Wikipedia, please rewrite your proposed article in the form of an encyclopedia entry. Encyclopedia entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of published, [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|sources]], not just to materials produced by the creator of the item being discussed.
|spam=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:I'm sorry, but your article appears to read more like an [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#SOAPBOX|advertisement]] than an entry in an encyclopedia. If you still feel that this subject is appropriate for Wikipedia, please rewrite your proposed article in the form of an encyclopedia entry. Encyclopedia entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of published, [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|sources]], not just to materials produced by the creator of the item being discussed.
|neo=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:[[Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|Neologisms]] are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|sourcing]]. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability.
|lang=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This is the English-language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide an English-language translation for your article, or visit the [http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia home page] to find the version of Wikipedia for your desired language.
|joke=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:Thank you for your submission. It appears that your submission is an attempt to be humourous over being [[WP:V|factual]]. As Wikipedia strives to contain only [[WP:V|factual entries]], we can not accept your submission at this time.
|npov=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:Your article does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of published material. If you still feel that this subject is appropriate for Wikipedia, please rewrite your proposed article in the form of an encyclopedia entry, and make sure to avoid certain [[Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms|terms meant to show off the subject]].
|not=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:The proposed article is [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|not suitable for Wikipedia]].
|blp=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:Wikipedia cannot accept articles which are potentially [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]]. All articles about living persons must conform to our [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] policy. [[Wikipedia:Attack page|Attack pages]] are prohibited.
|exists=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:This article already exists in Wikipedia. {{#ifeq:{{{2|}}}|{{{3}}}||You can find it at [[:{{{2}}}]].|}}
|mergeto=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article {{#ifeq:{{{2|}}}|{{{3}}}|on the same subject.|at [[{{{2}}}]].}} Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
|reason=The reviewer left the following comment:'''
:{{{2}}}
|The reason can be seen at the bottom.'''
}}


Please do not take it personally, but use the advice given to submit an article which meets the criteria.<br />
Please do not take it personally, but use the advice given to submit an article which meets the criteria.<br />
<small>If you wish to resubmit this article after making improvements, please replace the <nowiki>{{AFC completed}}</nowiki> tag at the top of the article by <nowiki>{{AFC pending}}</nowiki>.</small>
<small>If you wish to resubmit this article after making improvements, please add the text <nowiki>{{AFC submission|P}}</nowiki> at the top of the article.</small>
{{!}}}
{{!}}}
<includeonly>[[Category:Completed Afc requests|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>
<includeonly>[[Category:Completed Afc requests|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>
}}

Revision as of 09:25, 6 September 2008