User talk:Enknowed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Revert to revision 85217399 dated 2006-11-02 08:19:02 by (aeropagitica) using popups
warning on removing warnings
Line 28: Line 28:


Please do not recreate speedily-deleted material. This is considered vandalism and can lead to you being blocked from editing for a period of time. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 08:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not recreate speedily-deleted material. This is considered vandalism and can lead to you being blocked from editing for a period of time. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 08:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

==Removing warnings===
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to [[Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page|archive]] your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. <!-- Template:Wr (second level warning) -->--[[User:ArmadilloFromHell|<font color="#0000FF">'''Armadillo'''</font><font color="#000000">'''From'''</font><font color="#FF0000">'''Hell'''</font>]] 14:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:42, 2 November 2006

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Percy Nobby Norton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC), Recent changes patrol[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing speedy tag

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Nobby Norton

OK, you put a hangon tag on the article. So what is your reason for wanting this article to exist? Let's start with the ridiculous picture for starters. If you're just goofing around, fine, you've had your fun, let's not waste any more of my time, OK? If this person exists please cite external references . Herostratus 07:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw an argument somewhere. OR isn't grounds for speedy deletion. You know that. i kan reed 07:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you're just yanking my chain I'm gonna be hella annoyed. Herostratus 07:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information on minor Australian artists of any kind is hard to gather. I am doing my best and spending a lot of time on this article. It has only just begun, allow it time to develop. There's nothing insulting or factually incorrect on the page so it should be fine whilst I gather information. Enknowed 07:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing talk pages

When you sign a talk page, instead of typing your name out, you can use four tildes ~~~~ to automatically place your name and the time. Just thought I'd help you out.

Regarding your Percy Nobby Norton article, the speedy deletion was probably placed unfairly. The article has grounds for deletion because it lacks sources, speedy deletion is, however, reserved for articles lacking redeeming quality. Consider finding sources and adding them as descriped on this page. It will help article quality in the long run.

Happy editing, i kan reed 07:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion was because it appeared to be a nonsense article. That was because it failed to provide sources and was accompanied by a contemporay photo, yet the subject was from a hundred years ago. Other than an explanation that the picture is of an actor, nothing has changed. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

give the article a chance. Im still tracing info on percy norton. the picture acknowledges the efforts of an unknown artist who has been inpired by Norton's works. Enknowed 08:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate speedily-deleted material. This is considered vandalism and can lead to you being blocked from editing for a period of time. (aeropagitica) 08:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings=

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --ArmadilloFromHell 14:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]