User talk:Marbles

Marbles userpages on English Wikipedia
Userpage	Talk	Resources	Contributions	Userboxes

Leave a new message

Welcome!

Hello, Marbles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I personally invite you to do so in my own sandbox (just follow the simple rules!). Again, welcome! — ßottesiηi ^{Tell me what's up} 18:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on talk:Javine Hylton

Hi Marbless333,

Thanks for your comments and question on [Talk:Javine Hylton]. Can I recommend that you sign your comments? You can do this with four tildes - ~~~~ - that way, people can see who you are to respond?

You asked why a citation was necessary. Well, one of the principals of Wikipedia is that it is a compendium of knowledge from other sources - that is, everything which is included must be drawn from a verifiable external reference. So, in the case of Javine's performance in Eurovision, a suitable source may be BBC News' article on the matter such as this one[1]. I agree with you that one could assume that she completed the heats to get there.

If you'd like to understand more about what makes a good (acceptable) source, try looking at WP:RS. You might also find WP:CITE (which talks about how to cite sources), and WP:BLP which talks about the minimum quality requirements for biographies of living people.

If you have any other questions, please let me know. Mnbf9rca 20:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Tastecfn.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Tastecfn.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Moss Valley

I've re-structured the page so that the images are now thumbnails and not a gallery. Galleries seem to cause problems with some images and no pictures ever appear!

-- Maelor 12:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Namespace vio

I have moved Marbles333/userpage06 to User:Marbles333/userpage06. -- RHaworth 17:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I never noticed that myself! Marbles333 17:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiscali SpA

I just thought I should compliment you on your latest edits to the page. High quality, NPOV, wikified, and manages to slip in a criticism section that mentions the problem that me and a few of the people I know have faced. So well done, Wikipedia is better for contributors like yourself. --Dreaded Walrus 21:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Gold

Hi Marbles,

Essentially the sell-off was due to restrictions on the number of radio stations that any one entity can control. As I understand it GWR (prior to the GCap merger) sold the controlling 80% interest to UBC with a clause giving GWR the right to repurchase the interest at a future time should broadcast regulations be liberalised to the point that they'd be allowed to control all the stations. They were able to retain 20% as that doesn't amount to control of the stations when another entity owns all of the other 80%.

GCap "inhereted" that 20% at the time of the merger, presumably along with the right to repurchase UBC's stake (though whether they'd wish to do so is anyone's guess). As for sharing The One Network's studios, the arrangement existed since before GWR sold up to UBC, and I don't know this for sure but I guess the agreement with UBC allowed Classic Gold stations to continue the existing studio sharing arragements.

Hope that helps but please let me know if you need more info.

Cheers -- Matthew Humphreys 19:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking of 194.83.84.15

Hi Marbles333, I've unblocked that address as it was probably a bit harsh given that it is from a known educational institution and used by multiple users. — Moondyne 02:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid (TV channel) - Up for proposed deletion

Hi there...

In regards to the comments you made regarding the above article on its talk page, I have put the article up for deletion, for which my reasons are explained in the proposed deletion notice and the talk page. Regards. --tgheretford (talk) 08:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: IP blocking

I've rectified your comments. Please tell me if there are further problems. --May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 17:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - although no need to reply twice! :p Marbles333 21:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HTV

No, because naming conventions seek to place each article under what the majority of people know the subject as. But redirects are good, and free!, so we should do that just in case anyone ever has reason to use the corporate name :o) ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good good. I don't know anyone around here who calls it "ITV1 Wales" - still and always will be HTV. Marbles 20:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HTV etc (again)

Hey Marbles. It occurs to me that we're probably fighting something of a losing battle over the likes of HTV remaining HTV - the ident kiddies will eventually wear us down by moving all the franchise articles to ITV Something Or Other and having to be reverted, over and over again ad nauseum. They're already making unencyclopedic arguments on talk pages...

How about we head them off at the pass, creating the ITV Something or other articles and ensuring that existing content and names are kept, but that the Something or other articles are there for future development? Does that make sense? It'd require splitting the navigation templates like {{ITV}} and the like and some nifty disambiguation on the top of each article so that Real company points to Made up name and vice versa.

What do you think? ⇨REDVEЯS 20:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've slightly lost me there, Redvers! As far as I was aware, the ITV-plc modified names exist only as redirects, such as ITV Wales and West point to HTV, ITV Granada points to Granada Television and so on. HTV has been HTV for 33 years, and ITV Wales/West for a mere 4, and is almost universally known as HTV. Even our local newsgathering centre still posesses HTV signage - I don't know a single person who calls it "ITV1 Wales". Although HTV Group Ltd has become ITV Wales and West Ltd, the Ofcom contracts are still made to HTV Group Plc, despite the name of the company being changed. The same could be said about Carlton Television, which has absolutely no output at all these days. Marbles 21:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Netscape Template

Nice work —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SeanWDP (talk • contribs) 20:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you very much. I now consider the Netscape articles as of of my main priorities at the moment. Marbles 20:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ITVThamesValley.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ITVThamesValley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logotiscali.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logotiscali.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Onenetwork.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Onenetwork.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're not real, but delete the lot Marbles 11:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

adoption

hey I just got an account and I need some help. please adopt me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Knowledgable7 (talk • contribs) 06:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hola!

If ur broke and unemployed, instead of being on Wikipedia u should be out getting a job! YO! Wattup Homie? 01:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a full time student with a busy social calendar!!!!!!! I will get one sometime soon however the busfair is going up again. Marbles 14:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ya!

YES. I have no clue what I'm doing most of the time. HELP ME! YO! Wattup Homie? 00:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:S4C2.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:S4C2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption :D

Hi, Marbles! Can you adopt me please? :D

I'm in experienced but I like editing in Wikipedia but find it a bit difficult and slow at times when I have to search through help to get what I need and even then, not really understanding how it works!

My name's Fox, I'm 18 from Durham in England. My website is www.thefoxspot.net and my MySpace is www.myspace.com/snodawg, if you'd like to know a little about me :)

My MSN is foxdougan@gmail.com if you'd like to chat sometime, or we can just be in contact on here.

Thanks!

-Fox —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snodawg (talk • contribs) 13:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for adopting me! Wow, that was easy, normally to adopt someone you have to go through an adoption agency but it was really easy this time round :P

So I should just point questions here if I have any? Snodawg 16:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

What's your MSN? I think that'd be best. Snodawg 17:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks for your reply, I feel like I'm learning a lot already! Snodawg 17:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Marbles! Isn't this amazing, I'm editing your talk page. I'M editing YOUR talk page! yay! MathiasFox 08:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't have a specialism as of yet, it would seem. I suppose I'd like to clean up articles, as then I can be sure I'm not adding any information I only thought was true or deleting information which was actually useful. If I hear about something I want to know, I look it up... if the article isn't good I research it and rewrite it. Oh and German translations too. MathiasFox 16:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversions of the Freeview article

Just to make you aware, you have preformed three reverts on the Freeview article within 24 hours. If you revert any changes again, you will violate the three revert rule and an administrator may block you for up to 24 hours. Please take your disagreements to the talk page. Thanks. --tgheretford (talk) 12:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know very well the three revert rule, and if I feel a revert is neccessary I will carry out that revert, threats or no threats. There is no dispute, merely a misunderstanding. I did NOT implement the genercised trademark information. The user in question did not make his reason for cite tagging known, and neither was it placed in the correct position. I am perfectly obliged to correct information, although the first two were merely a misunderstanding of the editor's claims on my behalf. Infact, only two reverts have been made by myself, a third wording change was used but that was not considered a revert. I go by my reason for reverting - a cite is not needed or available for the information in which the editor tagged, the information I later removed which I percieved as uncited WAS NOT tagged. /Marbles 17:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adopting

You should amend the user page at User:Zitpuss to {{adoptoffer}} to stop people like me thinking the user still needs an adopter. Hope you don't mind me pointing this out! --Dweller 14:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not adopting User:Zitpuss right now. I've had no reply from them. /Marbles 16:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi!

this is zitpuss. sorry i haven't been on lately. i 4got my password and just now created a new account as zitpuss123. ok. i still checked my messages on my old account though.

The Apprentice UK

Hello, Marbles. Are you a fan of The Apprentice UK? I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 08:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ну ти сука і урод !!!!!!

lollollollollollollollollollollollollllloollooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

lol! i am like... so awsome!Zitpuss123 22:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can you adopt me please

Help Me Please

Can you adopt me Please Thrall99

Enjoy!

Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trampton 19:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC).Trampton 19:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Proposal for a UK radio stations task force

Hi there.

I noticed you are part of the radio stations WikiProject but wish to contribute to UK radio station articles only. I have made a proposal to start a UK radio stations task force which would be able to work more effectively with UK radio station articles whilst still being a part of the main radio stations WikiProject.

Full discussion and opinions are being sort here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio Stations#Proposal: UK Radio stations task force.

Thanks. --tgheretford (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New proposal: UK radio and radio stations task force

Hi there.

I am discussing a revised idea of starting a task force, part of WikiProject Radio which covers the radio industry, as well as the radio stations of the United Kingdom (in contrast to the original idea to just cover UK radio stations). Discussion on the proposal is here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio Stations#New proposal: UK radio and radio stations task force. Look forward to hearing your views and potential interest the revised task force. Thank you. --tgheretford (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further to discussion, the task force is now live at Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio/UK Radio (shortcut: WP:RADIO/UK). --tgheretford (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moss Valley

Hi, I'd like to add a few pics of Moss valley to the MV article you created. I'm taking some pics of the area this weekend and will upload them soon. I like to add them as thumbs and place them on the left hand side of the page, it will only be two photos, any other photos that I have I will place them in the gallery. Just wanted to run it past you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spicke01 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Help with posting

Marbles

I am based in London, a former journalist and have been interested in putting a few paras together on a specialist subject the Cape Verde islands. But I am having some trouble with formatting and protocols rather than basic writing skills. Are you able to assist pleaseJames Ensor 17:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)?[reply]

Thanks for your offer. I have been out in Cape Verde and unable to log on. My difficulty at present is really about the subject matter of any article and how to format it. Does it need a lot of links etc? When I have placed items they have been criticised for not having enough links. But this is a very primitive country and there are few online sources at all, which is precisely why I was hoping to fill a gap. What should I write about an upcoming holiday and property buying destination, which is little known to English-speakers please?

Looking for adoptive wiki-parent

Hi,

I'm very much a newbie to Wikipedia and need help with such things as grouping articles into categories, when to create a new page versus when to add new information to an existing page, and so on.

My particular topic interests are primarily in the area of special education in general and learning disabilities in particular. I don't need a mentor in the content area, but feedback on my contributions would be most welcome!

I'm in US Central timezone and am on Wikipedia only once or twice a week (I have two special needs children).

Thanks,

smoran 20:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New adoptee

Hi, Marbles.

Thanks for your reply! I'll take you up on your offer next time I have some time to work on my articles and begin hitting the issues with categories and so forth.

Look forward to working with you! smoran 05:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADOPT input

Hello, Marbles. The Adopt-a-User program is looking for new ideas and input on the program. If you are still interested please stop by the talk page and read some of the ideas being floated and give a comment. If you want to update or change your information on the adopter's list page, now would be a great time! Thanks! V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions} 03:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GMTV.JPG

Hello, Marbles. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:GMTV.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Marbles/sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoptee needs sanity check / guidance

Hi, Marbles. I could use some guidance on an article I'm working on, Dyslexia.

I've read through all the discussion page and interacted with the two current primary contributors. We don't have an active dispute, but I do think the content is at this point very flawed and I'm not sure how to proceed in raising the issues that I see. I need someone objective to give me a sanity check on my perceptions, hopefully followed by some guidance as to how to participate constructively so that we can move forward in developing the article.

The article is already long enough to turn into a series, and I think we have general consensus that the next step is to turn the article into a series, with the current article evolving over time into a top-level article using the summary style.

Here's a summary of the primary issues I see:

- When I look at the article, I don't recognize the information as representing mainstream dyslexia information published in the US by respected non-profit organizations and researchers. I suspect that part of the problem results from how the issues are viewed and addressed in the U.S. and the U.K, and that this is causing a problem because these editors are both dyslexic (so they have vested interests and very strong views) and from the U.K. On the other hand, I'm certainly not unbiased, so I would appreciate some feedback from an objective editor.

- There is some confusion about the expected audience for the article. The two current primary contributors (who are evidently both dyslexic) seem to believe that their primary audience is other dyslexics. As an encyclopedia article, I would expect the initial information to be geared for someone unfamiliar with the topic. Beyond that, I would expect more specialized topics to be addressed in subordinate or related articles. I'm sure that the Wiki prinicples of NPOV and article Summary Style can be used in the discussion. I'd just like some guidance on how to approach the issue without causing a war. :-)

- There are references to a couple of selected commercial programs and also a couple of "researchers" who gain financially from their publications and organizations, and there's resistance to removing such information. I'm pretty sure that these need to go.

I'm prepared to wait awhile on introducing issues in order to avoid disputes, but I think it would be good to begin a discussion of the issues --- one at a time --- presuming that my biases are not blinding me to the overall issues.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

Best,

smoran 19:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marbles,

Thanks much --- and good luck on your exams! smoran 02:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ITV1logo06.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ITV1logo06.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki user seeking help/adoption !

Hi Mark,

I've seen that you are offering to help newbies like me. I've left my details on my user page. I've just created my first Wiki entry - not very successfully - got filed for quick deletion because of my general inexperience ! Wiki is great, but also massive and slightly confusing. I'm looking for someone who can help me through the process of making good Wiki entries, adding sources & references and all the other bits and pieces ! Not a very competent Wiki user so you may have to talk slow initially. I'll check my user talk page for your reply. Hope you can help. thanks Paul.Cloversmate 11:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help with editing article

Marbles;

Please consider helping us with getting our article up to snuff with the wikipedia community as a whole. Please check out our article on Eno River Media Production. We copied the NBC article as closely as we could to get a non biased approach. Please help us get our article to look as cool as the NBC site.

My email address is adowling at ermp.tv

Please check out our website at www.ermp.tv

Thanks!!

APD

Unusual Adoption Request

Hi! Im an English teacher in Toluca Mexico (west of Mexico City). My Advanced B classes will be contributing to Wikipedia as the focus of their English course for Fall 2007. I am looking for people who would like to mentor my students (who will be working in groups) as they do the following assignments: Edit and article (adding a citation), writing a stub with a citation, translating an English language article for Spanish Wikipedia and for the final project, writing a full article for English Wiki (they can expand on the stub mentioned previously). What I would like to do is put a list of "mentors/adopters" on my talk page as a kind of short cut for my students, who have limited time to get things done. The semester begings Aug 6, but the real Wikipedia work wont begin until the beginning of Sept. If you would like to add your name to my list, please go to my talk page and add it there, perhaps with a short introduction, if you like.

Thank you!

Thelmadatter 20:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Thelmadatter[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Granada1992.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Granada1992.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MarcherGold.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:MarcherGold.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

need assistance understanding licenses

I have been offered a chapter from a medical text that I want to use to start an entry. I understand there are multiple licenses and after looking at them am confused about what to recommend the author. imageryguides 16:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article would best fit in a section under CAM.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Magictv.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Magictv.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hi, am new to wiki and would like to know if you would be willing to adopt me. My areas of interest would be Biographies and Politics with a bias towards India Specific articles. I can spend 30 mins during week days and 2-4 hours on week ends. I started working on the orphanage and came across the deletion policy. However not very clear on it and Would Want to do maintenence and also contribute/ Enhance the content of articlesGs44631 (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC.

Upload Pictures

Marbles, i went through Wiki's copyright policy and still not clear if i can upload images from news sites after quoting the source. Is information published in newspapers and mags not public info which anyone can use as long as the source is acknowledged.Gs44631 (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hiii

i was wondering if you could be my adopter thing on the adopt-a-user feature
well i'm new, and i figured I could use the help, especially considering i havnt exactly gotten off to the best of starts with User:SteveBaker, and my complaint didnt seem to get me anywhere, so i'm kind of just in need of help overall. But yeah anyway, I thought it might be a good idea... and if youre interested, wb
I would edit any kind of article really... although I may find myself more adept in editing those in relation to Malta... but yeah anything to be honest.
wb soon...
^^

xx Iamandrewrice (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

adoption !

Hey, dude, my usernames Wikidude57 you can adopt me!Wikipedian 21:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Hey, saw you were adopting. Let me know if you have room for 1 more.Cfarinella (talk) 16:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption Finalization

Got your message, just sealing the deal. Contact me when you get this message. Cfarinella (talk) 14:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flaunttv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flaunttv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just got a message about liscense tagging. could you give me some help on how to tag an uploaded pic? Cfarinella (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]