Talk:Seismic tomography and User talk:LuisGomez111: Difference between pages
m Updated class and importance for WikiProject Physics |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Tipitaka == |
|||
{{WP Earthquakes|class=start|importance=high}} |
|||
{{physics|class=start|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Geology |
|||
|class=start |
|||
|importance= |
|||
|attention= |
|||
|needs-infobox= |
|||
|peer-review= |
|||
|old-peer-review= |
|||
}} |
|||
You wrote, "the Tipitaka is central to all Buddhist schools." This is not true. The third pitaka, the abhidhammapitaka, is exclusively Theravada. Other early schools had very different ones, and the Mahayanists still refer to the Sarvastivada one. Also the Vinaya and agamas are slightly different for different schools. [[User:Mitsube|Mitsube]] ([[User talk:Mitsube|talk]]) 04:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Tomography in reflection seismology == |
|||
== Paella == |
|||
Tomographic inversion plays a significant part in depth imaging in the seismic oil exploration industry. This should probably be mentioned briefly. |
|||
[[User:136.250.232.88|136.250.232.88]] 13:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC) [[User:Robruss24|Robruss24]] 13:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Hello Luis. I saw that you removed every one of the changes I made. |
|||
==Move from "tomography" to "imaging"== |
|||
Now let me tell you why this changes were made. |
|||
I'm requesting this move since [[tomography]] is more of a medical term, and is unnecessarily jargon. Imaging is far more intuitive, and is more popular: |
|||
{|class="wikitable" |
|||
|- |
|||
! [[Google search]] !! Count |
|||
|- |
|||
| "seismic tomography" || 198,000 |
|||
|- |
|||
| "seismic imaging" || 260,000 |
|||
|} |
|||
Also, I'm starting a new article called [[Geophysical imaging]], showcasing the different geophysical techniques.<tt>+[[User:Mwtoews|mwtoews]]</tt> 23:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I would vote no on this. Seismic tomography is a subset of seismic imaging that relies on using forward-scattered energy to map long-wavelength variations in the Earth's seismic velocity. Seismic imaging also incorporates [[reflection seismology]] techniques (analogous to ultrasound imaging in medicine) that use back-scattered energy. [[User:Adrock828|Adrock828]] 09:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
!. |
|||
== WikiProject class rating== |
|||
The article is not giving any information on the dish in the begining, exept mentioning rice. |
|||
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
.That's why I added '''“usually containing vegetables and meat or seafood”'''. One have to present the topic in the begining, see “How to write an article”. People want to read about the dish , not about the Valencians. You have to think about the readers too. |
|||
2 |
|||
Not everybody knows who the Valencians are. Things which are obvious to you, a Spanish talking person – well, they might not be that clear for others, you know. That is why mentioning the language, some illiterate people from U.S. may think that they are Italian ppeople from Venice or get confused in other ways. You need to mention that when you introduce the information, not later, or below. |
|||
3 |
|||
'''It's these ingredients that Valencians insist go into making.''' |
|||
Well, this sounds like: the Valencians insist , but you disagree. Anyway it is not a neutral way of expressing something. It is better to use some other , more neutral way of expressing this. |
|||
You got used to this article, editing it a lot. But when somebody is reading it for the first time, from the outside, like me, than I get a first impression, and discover things you maybe have stopped thinking about, since you are so familiar with it. |
|||
Ok? |
|||
[[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 20:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:29, 11 October 2008
Tipitaka
You wrote, "the Tipitaka is central to all Buddhist schools." This is not true. The third pitaka, the abhidhammapitaka, is exclusively Theravada. Other early schools had very different ones, and the Mahayanists still refer to the Sarvastivada one. Also the Vinaya and agamas are slightly different for different schools. Mitsube (talk) 04:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Paella
Hello Luis. I saw that you removed every one of the changes I made. Now let me tell you why this changes were made.
!.
The article is not giving any information on the dish in the begining, exept mentioning rice.
.That's why I added “usually containing vegetables and meat or seafood”. One have to present the topic in the begining, see “How to write an article”. People want to read about the dish , not about the Valencians. You have to think about the readers too.
2
Not everybody knows who the Valencians are. Things which are obvious to you, a Spanish talking person – well, they might not be that clear for others, you know. That is why mentioning the language, some illiterate people from U.S. may think that they are Italian ppeople from Venice or get confused in other ways. You need to mention that when you introduce the information, not later, or below.
3
It's these ingredients that Valencians insist go into making.
Well, this sounds like: the Valencians insist , but you disagree. Anyway it is not a neutral way of expressing something. It is better to use some other , more neutral way of expressing this.
You got used to this article, editing it a lot. But when somebody is reading it for the first time, from the outside, like me, than I get a first impression, and discover things you maybe have stopped thinking about, since you are so familiar with it. Ok?
Warrington (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)