Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
'Openly' Partisan Sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
"...although it is regarded as poor taste to discuss personal theories on talk pages" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
"Appears that" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
"Appropriate to the subject" |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
"Atlas-type" facts |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
"Common sense" on Wikipedia |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
"consensus changing" tag |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
"directly related" edits/reverts |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
"Entropy" in WP:PSTS over the past few months |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
"I do not think that means what you think it means." |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
"Material serving to advance a position" |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
"Novel Narrative"? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
"OR refers to OR by WP editors"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
"Original images" section |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
"Synthesis of published material" questions |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
"the most reliable sources" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
"The sky is blue" -- do I need a source? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
"This should include websites"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
"Tiny minority" view |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
"to advance a position" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
"Unsigned articles may be less reliable" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
(DIYD)2. Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
<nowiki>{{cite I looked at the bloody file}}</nowiki> |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
135,000 |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
2nd Person |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
A B S U R D ! |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
A better way to look at accessibility |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
a case in point: synthesis |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
A case study (and improving Wikipedia to make a point) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
A Criticism of WP:NOR |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
A Different Approach |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
A different explanation in hopes of clarity |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
A handful of edits |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
A line big enough to drive a truck through.... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
A minor adjustment |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
A netural opinion? |
Unknown |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
A new look at OR in general |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
A person as a secondary source |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
A point of interest |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
a proposal - just the intro |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
A Proposed ammendment to the "No original research" limitation |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
A Proposed Clarification of How NOR Is Employed |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
a question about original research: |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
A question of consensus |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
A related essay |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
A reminder to all |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
A request for advice |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
A separate problem with the synthesis section |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
A slight rewording of the proposal |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
a test case for where NOR intersects with Vanity Guidelines |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
A turning point in national history |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
A whole lotta synthesis goin' on |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Absurd? |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Action figures |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Actual proposed change |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Added some motivation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Addition by Blueboar |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Additional opinions wanted - Angie's List |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Advice |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Ahead, not after |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
All primary v. secondary sources discussion moved |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Altered paragraph |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Altered photos |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Alternative proposals: straw poll. |
62 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
An alternative proposal |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
An article about finding research? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
An attempt to rework this policy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
An example of officious interference |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
An illustration of the proper vs improper use of a primary source... |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
An important distinction |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
an informal request for comment |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
An inquiry on the synthesis policy |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
An interesting case |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
And God... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Annotated bibliographies at AfD |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Anonymous insertion at WP:RS |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Another calculator example |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Another debate over the use of PS |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Another proposal: moving PSTS to WP:V? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Another proposal |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Another reminder |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Another test case? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Another topic for discussion |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Another word change |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Appear to advance a position |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Apple Pie |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Application of definitions: synthesis? |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Archive naming |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Archiving |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Are examples original research? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Are immediately verifiable statements OR? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Are interviews primary or secondary sources? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Are journal articles primary and secondary sources? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Are most Wikipedia "Lists of" original research? (fork from âGhost rampâ) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Are simple observations original research. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Are some articles exempt from this policy? |
48 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Are we offending someone? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Are we sure we want a special rule for scientific articles? |
58 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Article with a LOT of Synthesis |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
articles signed by experts |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
assertions, theories, opinions, and arguments |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Assistance and voices |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Assumption of bad faith in original research |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Attempt to address the new opposition |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Attempt to bypass WP:V and WP:NOR |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Attempt to destroy the policy |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Attempts to refute a position |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Attention needed of SYNT experts! |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Attention newcomers to this article |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Audio recording |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Authority is not a concept in the no original research policy. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Autobiographies |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Avoiding Nursery Jargon, Welcoming External Criticism |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Avoiding primary/secondary thing |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Back to basics |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Back to the question of what policy should be |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Bad Policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Based on use |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
BBC Example |
Unknown |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Before we unprotect the page |
81 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Bias against sourced research |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Bibliographies and etcographies |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Bludgeon |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Blueboar's re-draft of Speny's approach |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Book Review |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Books and movies |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1
|
broken link |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Burden of showing consensus |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
But OR may be all we have! |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Buy Why?? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
C'mon! O.R. is EVERYWHERE! |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Can a distributor's product manual be used as a source? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Can I use Time as a secondary source? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Can it be made clearer that there are no exceptions? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Can Original research be defined without defining the types of sources? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Can somebody weigh on a case of possible OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Can someone show me a real example of good primary-source material that could not be used under this policy? |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Can we describe good Wikipedia research practice on another page? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Can we say that two conflicting sources conflict? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Can we use O.R. to argue for or against a source? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Carrying NPOV foreward into NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Case study: Philippe Casado |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Catholicism and Freemasonry |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Catholicism and Freemasonry again |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Census as a primary source |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research
|
Change needed? Also, a question |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Change the name of "original research" to "unsourceable research" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Changed "Expert Editors" back to original |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
Changing policy pages to bolster one's own position in an article edit war |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Chess engine analysis |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Chicago manual of style |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Chinese cash |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Christian Cross Asterism (astronomy) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
Citation indexes |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
Citations |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Cited sources =/= original research-free |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Citing Jimmy Wales |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Citing Oneself |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
clarification of "regardless of whether it's true or not" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Clarification of "Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position" |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Clarification of policy |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Clarification of policy |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Clarification or Amendment of WP:SYN |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Clarification to Top-of-Page Warning |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Clarifications |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Clarifications needed |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research
|
Clarifying "Primary sources" |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Clear and simple (2) |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Clear and simple |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Clearly tieing PSTS to NOR |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
COGDEN's edit (Two-part test as applied to secondary sources) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Cogden's revert |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
COGDEN's tag |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Comments on 9/20 (15:48) draft of proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Comments on 9/20 draft (minor update) proposal |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Comments on the alternative proposal |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Common knowledge, but no source |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Common Knowledge |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Compromise on archiving |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Conceptual problem for newbie, concerning acceptable contributions. Related to: Are simple observations original research. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
conclusion / Proposal: more slack for this guideline |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Conflict between Policies |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Confounding NOR and NPOV |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Confusion over the meaning of original research |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Connection with reliable source and verifiability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Consensus |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Consensus |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Consensus determination ideas |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Consolidation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1
|
controversy over authority |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Controversy over criticism of Quebec society |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Conversion and WP:SYNTH. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Copyright issues |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Could someone define "self-published"? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Could someone with a good grasp of NOR, and a good deal of patience and time on their hand please provide a second opinion |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Creation-evolution_controversy article (clarification and guidance sought) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Creative Crackpottery Citing Legitimate Sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Crime Rate Example |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Cutting to the chase |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Data-crunching OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Data about planets â is some calculation allowed? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Data Mining |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Dave Carter copied from blp talk |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Deductions |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Defining terms by interpreting quotations |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Definition of "published" â Resolved, we don't need another one, an informal poll |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Definitions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Derogatory statements, and personal insults |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Descriptive claims |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Descriptive plot summeries and primary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Designed to advance a position |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Detailed example of synthesis |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Dictionary |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Direct quote |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Direct quotes and special definitions |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Discussed and undiscussed edits |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Discussing interpretation of poems, novels, and the like |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Discussing Primary/Secondary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Discussion about image use and WP:NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Discussion about NPOV, NOR, Verifiability etc. on Talk:Fedora Core |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Discussion about particular attribution |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Discussion about sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Discussion of consensus on policy editing privilege |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Dispute about the policy in a nutshell |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Dispute regarding PSTS |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Dispute regarding publication of original research in article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Disputes between different parties |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Do I really have to prove that Einstein's general relativity of 1915 isn't a result of my original research? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Do interpretive primary reliable sources need to be verified by a second interpretive reliable source? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Do not agree with this site |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Do not confuse the success of Wikipedia with the success of this policy |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Do we still have any conflicts over this one section? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 10
|
Does adding statistics count as synthesizing data? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Does anybody have concrete instances of what the PSTS distinction accomplishes? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Does size always equal quality of reputation or relevance of research? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Does the "Original" in "No original research" mean anything anymore? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Does the Pope have white hair? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
double standard |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Draft as of 9/20/07 (15:48) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Draft as of 9/20/07 (minor update) |
Unknown |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Draft explanation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Edit summaries |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Editing comment |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Editors citing themselves |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
Editors citing themselves rule change |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
Edits in April |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Eliminating Primary Sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Email to ask question is original research? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
End-runs around WP:NPOV? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
End run |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Enough |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Equations: Original research and verifiability |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Erroneous use of "synthesis" in summary |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Errors in "reliable sources" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Eschewing original thought is virtue? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Ethnicity inclusions |
98 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Everyone stop... |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Evidence.... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Example |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Example link broken |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Example of new synthesis of published material |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Example without PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Examples |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Examples are original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Examples too broad; major change |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Exception for maths |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Excluded or included? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Expert consensus |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Expert editors |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 10
|
Eyewitness testimony |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Facts and Interpretations |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Facts must be backed by citations |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Facts verifiable by Wikipedia readers |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Failure to Communicate |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
Fake images in aviation accident articles |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Feedback Please |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Fiction in Wikipedia |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
First sentence |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Flood of peer-reviewed "facts" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Focus and awareness |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
For clarity |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
For Leflyman |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Foundation issues??? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Frustrating |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Fullstop's description of a primary source |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Fundamental problems with this policy |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
FYI, there is a request for arbitration and a request for comment regarding PSTS |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Getting back to the other debate... |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Ghost ramp |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Goals |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Good article ? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Google Earth |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Got a question |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Grace period? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Grocery-store analogy |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Grocery-story analogy |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
HDI calculation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Helllllllppppppp |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Help with possible original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Help with what constitutes original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Here's a fun example |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Here in Italy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Historical Datapoints for WP:NOR |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Hmmm... is this original research? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Honored in the breach . . . |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Hopefully, Final version of this proposed addition |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Houston, we have a trouble |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
How does "no original research" fit with plot summaries? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
How I see the source issues |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
How is the current practice harmful? Or is it? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
How to cite sources |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
How to deal with Wikipedia entries about theories |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
How to determine what is a reputable source |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
How to fix the problem? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
How to promote instruction creep |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
How to use primary sources without original research |
73 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Hypothetical question |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Hypothetical Situation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
I Challenge the Following |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
I don't want to write any more until someone breaks up the last section |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
I just don't get it... |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Identifying the ground floor |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
If PSTS was moved, is this policy weakened? |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
If we remove PSTS from this article, where will (should) they go? |
57 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
If we split PSTS into definitions and usage... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
If you have a longtanding version that lasts longer than four years, please see a doctor |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
Image:Vineland 55-60.jpg |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
importance-s template |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Important text change that would bring in a new policy on what is original research |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Inappropriate editing |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Inclusion of certain exceptions |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research
|
Infinite verb forms |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Info on translation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Instantiating a mathematical formula |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Interpretation of images |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Interpreting text on an image: OR or not? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Intro caveat in WP:PSTS |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Inuit |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Inverviewing people |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Is adding perspective WP:OR? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Is anyone else frustrated by endless rumbles over the main page? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Is it original research if..... |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Is it original research if... (redux) |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Is it original research to translate an anonymous webboard posting? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Is juxtaposition of A and B equivalent to OR ? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Is linking to a forum post enough non-original reseachness for a nickname? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Is listing a subset from a published government document original research? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Is merging data tables from diverse sources OR? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Is NOR Synthesis applicable to math and physics? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Is PSTS too complex? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Is Quoting from Wayback (web.archive.org) Considered OR? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Is research ever really defined? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Is the article Jennings Rutter Battle original research? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Is the purpose of this rule to promote propaganda? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Is there any room for compromise? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Is this OR? "A number of people have done this" |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Is this OR? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Is this OR? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Is this OR? Translation of ancient manuscript |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
is this original research? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Is this original research? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Is this original reserach/synthesis? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Is using a definition original research? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Issues at hand, part 2: The Revenge (Arbitrary Break) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Issues at hand |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Issues with this policy |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Jelly bean, interpretation of SYNT, and request for opinions. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Jewish Bolshevism |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Jimbo's quote |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Jimbo Wales's requested poll nearly done - please see |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Journal articles |
82 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Just a little confused |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Just one thought... |
Unknown |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Just to be clear... |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Just to be clear: definition of primary and secondary sources |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Just to circle around Synthesis section again |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Just wondering |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Kinds of claims first, kinds of sources second? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
law / articles about legal cases |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Legal implications |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Legal implications |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Let's find Waldo |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Let me see if I got this straight... |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Life beyond PSTS -bloat reduction âOther optionsâ |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Life beyond PSTS -bloat reduction |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Limited Access Publications |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Limited cases of original vocabulary |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Link to Original Research page |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Links to primary source, secondary source, and tertiary source |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Lists of People? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Looking Better |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Lost clarification against editing policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Making a phone call? |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Making your own sources/citations |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Material close to the subject.. |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Math - where is the line between paraphrasing and synthesizing/interpreting? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Math |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Math calculations |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Mathematics |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Meaning of "Novel" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Meaning of Primary, Secondary & Tertiary Sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Measurements from maps |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Minor clarification to WP:PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
minor proposals |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Minorities/Undue weight: clarification of "regardless of whether it's true or not" - continued |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Minorities |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Miscellaneous |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1
|
Misrepresentations by all 'sides' concerned |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Misuse of Wikipedia Policies |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
More appreciative of the role of experts |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
More reasons for sourcing |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
More to be said about the role of experts. |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Most scientists |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Motivations |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Move PSTS to reduce churn |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Move the WP:PSTS section to the WP:V page ? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Moved from bot discussion page |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Moving PSTS |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Moving the discussion forward |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
My Problem with WP:OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
my revert |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Need a neutral opinion on NOR |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Need Clarification |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Need guidance on identifying OR in the case of ..... |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Need input on page in this matter |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Need some opinion here |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Needed clause: Lincoln's left foot |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Neutronium: Something odd here |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
New combined merge/prot/community discussion header tag |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
New draft, incorporating comments |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
New edits... So far so good |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
New lead to WP:SYN |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
New synthesis, etc. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
New theories |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Newspaper accounts |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Newspapers |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
No consensus even among the proponents |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
No necessity to cite (second) |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
No necessity to cite |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
No original reverts? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Non negotiable |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
NOR, discussion pages, and 'Explanation' |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
NOR: Content vs Presentation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
NOR and articles on TV and cartoon characters |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
NOR is a red herring |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
NOR is useful. The word "primary" is not. |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
NOR limiting the usefulness of WP |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
NOR vs. photos made by Wikipedians |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
NotabilitySignificance is central to OR? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
NOTE: There is a proposal to merge this page into WP:ATT. |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Notice of draft revision |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Novelty in Synthesis |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Now historical |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
NPOV and No original research |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Nutshell |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Nutshell |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Nutshell |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Nutshell |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Nutshell clause |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Nutshell grammar |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Nutshell text spilling onto Wikipedia policies box? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Nutshell wording: continuing |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Objections to copy-edit |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Oh, Please, what about Bible stories? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
OK, how about these questions? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
OK, how about this? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Okay, another question posed |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
On sources, and the classification thereof |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
On talk pages addition |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
On the appropriate uses of primary sources |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
On the Integrity of WP:Policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
On WikiPseudoConsensus |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Only published primary sources? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Open Source Software vs. Wikipedia |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Opening policy nutshell |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Opinions please: should this change have been reverted? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Option 2b |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
OR/Synthesis dispute |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
OR and translation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
OR Claim: 3 legs'o' WP derivable from usability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
OR in articles vs OR in talk pages |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
OR interpretation dispute |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
OR vs. deficit of research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Original calculations |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Original consensus formulation |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Original images - Need an admin to assist |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Original images |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Original images |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Original images and 'artist's impressions' |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Original information exception |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Original pictures |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Original research |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Original research and disputes of verifibility |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Original research being allowed? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Original research being allowed in some form |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Original research in external links? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
original research link? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Original research or novel idea |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Original Research question - artist-submitted information |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Original Research vs. Collection of information |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Original Research vs Copyright Violation |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Original research wanted... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Origins of this policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Osteopathic medicine |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Other avenues |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Over a year |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Overstretched definition of âoriginal researchâ? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Page rename? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Page unprotected |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Parasite |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Patents and research articles |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
peer reviewed academic articles are primary sources ? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Peer Reviewed Publications Should Always Treated As Reliable Secondary Sources |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Perhaps a "STFU, this isn't the article itself" tag? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Perhaps something like this |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Permissible synthesis |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Persecution |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Persecution |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Personal interviews that were published |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Personal testimony |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Photo manipulation |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Photograph captions |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Photos which are intended to make a specific point |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Picking patterns out of a timetable: OR? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Plagiarism example |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Please |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Please don't start discussions on other pages without repeated mention on this page! |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Please include link to Swedish Wikipedia |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Please let us know if this is OR... |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Please use talk page before adding content |
54 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Policies regarding translations? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Policy changes by SlimVirgin |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Policy dispute regarding primary sources and OR (requested comment) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Policy on Original Research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Pool Forge Covered Bridge and OR |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Popular culture? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Possible clarification |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Possible guidelines about when synthesis is and isn't OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Possible rewording of WP:SYN |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Possible way toward consensus: strengthening the neglected S and T elements of PSTS. |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Posters |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Practical and Structural Problems with the Present Directives on Self-Citation |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
Precedents for AfDs regarding "no new analysis or synthesis" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Preference for primary sources for quotations? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Press again |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Press as a reliable source wording needs fixing |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Primary, secondary, and tertiary |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Primary/secondary distinction |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Primary/Secondary Vs Original/Not Original |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Primary and secondary |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Primary and secondary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Primary and secondary sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Primary and secondary sources |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Primary information as "research" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
primary over secondary sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Primary source distinction |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Primary sources, notability, and this policy |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Primary sources |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Primary Sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Primary sources vs. secondary sources |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Primary v. secondary sources in the scientific literature |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Primary vs. secondary: facts vs. analysis |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Primary vs. secondary |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Primary vs. secondary based on content |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Primary vs. Secondary sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Primary Vs Secondary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Priveleged experts |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Problem articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Problem on an article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Proclamation of protest against policy violation on N.O.R. |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Programming Code |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Prohibiting Original Thinking Precludes Quality Work |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Proposal: change Apple Pie example |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Proposal: just change the terms primary-->raw and secondary-->interpretive |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Proposal: Make explicit when sourced lists NOT WP:OR |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Proposal: more slack for this guideline |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Proposal: State that "no original research" has a specific meaning on Wikipedia |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
Proposal |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Proposal |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Proposal : Recognized expertise trumps other claims |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Proposal for removing the coats from the coatrack |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Proposal for second section |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Proposal to move forward |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Proposal to shut up |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Proposals for exceptions to the policy |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Proposed addendum |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Proposed addition: "Original research is allowed on Talk pages" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Proposed Addition to the Policy |
87 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Proposed alternative example of synthesis |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Proposed alternative wording for Citing oneself section |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 10
|
Proposed amendment |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Proposed definition of Publish |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Proposed Example of Synthesis - Restatement |
74 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Proposed language as of 9/21/07 |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Proposed new section on Primary and secondary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Proposed text addition to the policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research
|
Proposed wording as of 2007-Sept-22 |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
proposed wording change |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Protect |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
protected? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
protection |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Protection |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
protection |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Protection |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Protection |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Protection of wrong version |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Provide your interpretation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Provide your interpretation |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
PST in religion articles |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
PSTS- autobiographies |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
PSTS Confusion and Disagreements |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research
|
PSTS and conflicting definitions |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
PSTS and source typing |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
PSTS anomalies |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
PSTS autobiographies |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
PSTS proposals |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
PSTS relative to subject |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Publications in peer-reviewed journals |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1
|
Published = Made Public |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
published court decision |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Published Crackpottery and Apologetics |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Published Original Research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Publishing one's own translations in Wikipedia |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Punctuation correction needed |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Quality vs type |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Query |
96 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Question: Self contradiction in rules?! |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Question |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Question 2 |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Question |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Question 3 |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Question |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Question |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Question about an audio sample |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Question about Census data and crime stats |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
question about usability |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Question about using a novel as a source for a statement about the author |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Question about WP:SYN |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Question for Pproctor |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Question on synthesis of Maps |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Question Regarding Self Publishing |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Quick check |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Rant on special definitions |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Re: WP:BLP#Reliable sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Real life example |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Reasonable inference |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Reasonable Inference again |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Recap of PSTS issues for those just joining |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Recent changes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Recent changes |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Recent changes to secondary sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Recent edits |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Recent POV-pushing |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Reference desk |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
References/external links name-change proposal |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Refocus |
69 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Refocusing on the source discussion |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Refrencing a T.V |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Regroup |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Reinterpretation of "Directly Related" |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Related policies section |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Relation of PSTS to "... in popular culture" sections |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Reliable Publication or Source |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Reliable Source |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Reliance on primary sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Removal of No Original Research policy |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Removal of tag |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Remove citation from talk page? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Remove two words? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Removed Paragraph |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
removing {{tl|historical}} from talk page |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Removing original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Reputable publications -> NPOV |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
Request edit |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Request for clarification: self-cite |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Request for Comment - The Matrix Online |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Request for comments on Original research in Historical revisionism article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Request wording change and clarification |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Requesting Unprotection of the NOR Page |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Research, Rephrasing and Reasoning |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Restoring "source-based research" and "apple pie" paragraphs |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Reversed audio clips |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Reversion of copy-edit |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Revert: please reach consensus before making changes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Reverts |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Review of Policy |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Revised primary, secondary, and tertiary section |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Revisiting a proposal |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Revisiting use of primary sources in controversial articles |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
reword in order to assume good faith |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
RfC: Interpreting WP:NOR in the context of examples of Mnemonics |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
RfC: Proposal for WP:PSTS |
93 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
RfC for Hyles Anderson College |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
RfC related to WP:SYNTH |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Safe to unprotect? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Scientific articles |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Scientific Data Presentation vs. No Original Research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Scientific Studies As Reliable Secondary Sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Scope of OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Scriptures |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Second case study: Jacques Derrida |
56 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Secondary sources: bias, fairness, and objectivity |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Secondary sources |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
secondary sources II |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Secondary sources need not be verifiable by non-specialists |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
secondary sources preferred? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Secondary vs. tertiary sources and signing |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Section Titles are Original Research? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Selective citation to advance a position |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Semi-hypothetical query |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Semi-protection time? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Serve/serves |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Several changes per day - please stop! |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
SF Giants programs |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Shane Ruttle Martinez |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Shifting the PSTS paradigm |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
should we make a proposed change essay page? |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Should WP:ATT be marked as "historical"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Sidebar? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Signed encyclopedia articles |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Signed Posts |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Silly Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Simple question. |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Simplification: removing primary and/or secondary |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
SlimVirgin's "Synthesis" point |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
SlimVirgin's recent edit(s) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Solecism/Tautology |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Some advice please |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Some concerns with the current NOR article |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Someone else deal with it |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Son Of Suggestion |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
Sorry folks... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Source-based research |
Unknown |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Source Definitions? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Source typing in controversial articles |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Sources - Disputed section? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research
|
Sources proposal |
64 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
sources question |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Specialist knowledge |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Specialist knowledge |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Specific applications |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Squaring the circle |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Statement of Gerry Ashton's proposed definition |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
statements concluding: "No conclusion can be made" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Stating omissions |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Stating the obvious is not original research and there needs to be a grace period for hard-to-find references. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Statistically proveable original research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Step-by-step |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Still on OR policy |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Straw poll: Should No original research take a stand against primary sources and tertiary sources? |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Straw poll about interpretive primary sources. |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Straw poll to narrow dispute more |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Straw poll to test for consensus to remove edit protection |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Suggested change to opening paragraph |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Suggested clarification: No original research rule applies to the article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Suggested tweak |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
Suggestion for refocussing of PSTS |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Suggestions for Getting Back on Track |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11
|
Summary of concerns on source typing |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Summary of PSTS issues |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Supporting or WP:SYN |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Sure |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
syllogism |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
SYN |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Synopses of film/video/etc |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Synopsyes of novels |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
SYNT. Yes, it's me again. |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Synt check requested |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Synthesis? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
Synthesis |
66 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Synthesis |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Synthesis example |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Synthesis issue |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Synthesis issue at Doctor Fate |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Synthesis of published material -- request for clarification |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Synthesis of published material is not in itself original research |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Synthesis proposal: without the red herring |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Synthesis vs. synthesis advancing a position |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Synthesis yet again |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Systematic removal in spite of extraordinary obviousness |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Tags on PSTS |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Taking the dive (PSTS proposal) |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Talk Pages |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Template |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Template for violations |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2
|
Terrorism |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Terryeo does not answer proof challenge |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Tertiary sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Tertiary Sources |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Tertiary sources |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Test Case |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
That Was No Revert |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12
|
That wasn't reorganization, that was a major rewrite |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
The applicability of WP:OR to user-created illustrations of extinct animals... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
The disinformation caused by the OR policy |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
The evolution article |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
The famous(?) "OMG WTF, this isn't what I learned" argument |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
The IAL population hydra |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
The interminable ramble |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
The Line? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
The Mess on WP:NOR |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
The problem with: "arguments that appears to advance a position" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
The problem with "directly related" |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
The problem with "directly related" |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
The problem with Descriptive claims from Primary research |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
The problem with PSTSâInsufficient granularity |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
The true meaning of Original Research |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
The two versions |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
The way the policy is setup is not clear. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
There is no real substantive difference between stating and advancing a position |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
There should be EXCEPTIONS to this policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
These policies aint worth a crap without critique |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
This dispute is disputed. |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
This is not USENET |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
This policy allows WP to be highjacked by sensationalist publishing |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
This policy is non-negotiable |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
This policy must be destroyed |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
This policy should be deleted |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
This rule cannot work, does not work and will never work. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
This SYN issue might have come up before |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
This whole issue over the "articles should rely on secondary sources" does raise a good point though... |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Tie-in books |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Time chain |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
To the general public |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Toleration of OR maps |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Towards a compromise: A modest proposal |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Transclusion example |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
transcript of a public hearing |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Translating the Policy page |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Translation(s) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Translation |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33
|
Translation into Dutch |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Translations |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Trolling |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9
|
truth |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
TV shows |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Two minor points |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Two Questions |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Unclear section |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Unprotected? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Unprotected |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Unprotecting |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Unreliable citation from reliable sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Untested theories? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Use by cranks |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
Use My Brain |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Use of (sic) and [] in a quote |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Use of an example to test |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Use of census data |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7
|
Use of secondhand |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Usenet as a secondary source |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
User:Tyresias |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Using Google Books search links as surveys |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Using sources |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
Various OR questions. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Vehement opposition to this policy, and proposed remedy |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Verifiability, not truth?? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Verifiability (V) - clarification needed |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Village pump |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
violating V implies violating NOR? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Warnings added to policy page |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24
|
We need some exceptions to the policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
What's going on here? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
What's the largest source-related statement for which there is a consensus? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
What's the uproar about? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
What about documentaries |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
What about information where sources cannot be found at all? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
What are people afraid of? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
What counts as a reputable publication? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6
|
What do we agree on? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
What does "novel" mean? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
What if it's published in a journal first? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
What if we just swaped words? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
What is a "primary source"? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
What is a Reputable Publisher? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
What is being done to improve the policy of Wikipedia? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
What is Original Research in the UEFA Cup? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
What is reliable? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
What is wrong with OR? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
What means ânot truthâ in Wikipedia policy statement? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
What of describing assertions as non-sensical and other simple logical conclusions? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
What should happen when WP:SYN contradicts WP:NPOV? |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
What to do about serious editors with legitimate OR. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Whatever happened to Blueboar's proposal? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
When can we unprotect? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
When is a lack of sources poor sourcing, and when is it OR? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
When is a theory? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Where's the beef? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29
|
Where's the consensus? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Where can we put original research? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Where can we put stuff so it won't be lost? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Where do NOR-interested Wikipedians hang out? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Where is the line between synthesis and pointing out the obvious? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Where is the original discussion for the policy in a nutshell? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Where to draw the line? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1
|
Where to put it |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Who is our model verifier? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Why are people upset with this policy? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Why continue these insults, let us engage in proper discussion to reach consensus |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
Why did PSTS drop examples of secondary sources? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Why has this become so complicated? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22
|
Why not just recommend source-checking? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20
|
Why Peer Review/Secondary Sources Discussed Here |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Why this discussion started |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Why we DO need some sort of a statement on primary sources usage |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
Why you can't change it (crossposted) |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Wiki's OR policy has disturbing side effects |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Wiki |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Wikinews |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Wikinfo suggestion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Wikipedia:Attribution: Merger of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
Wikipedia:Attribution |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35
|
Wikipedia:Attribution |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Wikipedia:concensus |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13
|
Wikipedia:It's ok to use your brain |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
Wikipedia:No original research#Reliable sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27
|
Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Wikipedia:Requests for verification |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Wikipedia articles include material on the basis of verifiability, not truth. |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
Wikipedia being place for peer-reviewing |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3
|
Wikipedia doesn't have a factual accuracy policy? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
Wikipedia is a secondary source on many articles; change the policy, delete the articles, or ignore? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
Wikisource is not the place for original research |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1
|
Wikiversity |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14
|
Wikiversity |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36
|
Word Etymologies |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
Working through the backlog |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|
Working towards a consensus wording |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
Would the Arbitration Committee hear this? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26
|
Would this be acceptable, re: PSTS |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31
|
Would this qualify as OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
WP:ARCHIVES |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5
|
WP:ATT: Join the discussion at |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
WP:IAR has more reasons to now to be the guiding policy |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
WP:NOR#Disputes over how established a view is |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4
|
WP:NOR and free images |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19
|
WP:NOR is stupid |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21
|
WP:OR and images of non-existant things |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17
|
WP:POLICY dispute |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30
|
WP:PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23
|
WP:SYNT at Persian Gulf naming dispute ? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16
|
WP:SYNTH violation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28
|
WP:WITS (II) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
WP:WITS |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32
|
Yet another proposal (yes, again) |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25
|
Yet Another Unenforceable Policy (YAUP) |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8
|
You cannot describe and summarize conflicting POV's, without violating WP:SYN |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18
|
YouTube |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34
|
YouTube art as primary source |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15
|