Harmonic map: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mathanor (talk | contribs)
Reverting last edit (see discussion)
Line 3: Line 3:
This functional ''E'' will be defined precisely below—one way of understanding it is to imagine that ''M'' is made of [[rubber]], ''N'' is made of [[marble]] (their shapes given by their respective [[Metric tensor|metrics]]), and the map ''φ'':M→N prescribes how one "applies" the rubber onto the marble: ''E''(''φ'') then represents the total amount of [[elastic potential energy]] resulting from tension in the rubber. In these terms, ''φ'' is a harmonic map if the rubber, when "released" but still constrained to stay everywhere in contact with the marble, already finds itself in a position of equilibrium and therefore does not "snap" into a different shape.
This functional ''E'' will be defined precisely below—one way of understanding it is to imagine that ''M'' is made of [[rubber]], ''N'' is made of [[marble]] (their shapes given by their respective [[Metric tensor|metrics]]), and the map ''φ'':M→N prescribes how one "applies" the rubber onto the marble: ''E''(''φ'') then represents the total amount of [[elastic potential energy]] resulting from tension in the rubber. In these terms, ''φ'' is a harmonic map if the rubber, when "released" but still constrained to stay everywhere in contact with the marble, already finds itself in a position of equilibrium and therefore does not "snap" into a different shape.


Harmonic maps were introduced in [[1964]] by J. Eells and J.H. Sampson.<ref>J. Eells, J.H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, ''Amer. J. Math.'' '''86''' (1964), 109&ndash;160</ref><ref>J. Eells and L. Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps, ''Bull. London Math. Soc.'' '''10''' (1978), 1&ndash;68</ref><ref>J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Another report on harmonic maps, ''Bull. London Math. Soc.'' '''20''' (1988), 385&ndash;524</ref>
Harmonic maps were introduced in [[1964]] by J. Eells and J.H. Sampson.<ref>J. Eells and J.H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, ''Amer. J. Math.'' '''86''' (1964), 109&ndash;160</ref><ref>J. Eells and L. Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps, ''Bull. London Math. Soc.'' '''10''' (1978), 1&ndash;68</ref><ref>J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Another report on harmonic maps, ''Bull. London Math. Soc.'' '''20''' (1988), 385&ndash;524</ref>


== Mathematical definition ==
== Mathematical definition ==
Line 43: Line 43:


[[Category:Riemannian geometry]]
[[Category:Riemannian geometry]]
[[Category:Harmonic analysis]]

Revision as of 08:06, 24 February 2007

A (smooth) map φ:MN between Riemannian manifolds M and N is called harmonic if it is a critical point of the energy functional E(φ).

This functional E will be defined precisely below—one way of understanding it is to imagine that M is made of rubber, N is made of marble (their shapes given by their respective metrics), and the map φ:M→N prescribes how one "applies" the rubber onto the marble: E(φ) then represents the total amount of elastic potential energy resulting from tension in the rubber. In these terms, φ is a harmonic map if the rubber, when "released" but still constrained to stay everywhere in contact with the marble, already finds itself in a position of equilibrium and therefore does not "snap" into a different shape.

Harmonic maps were introduced in 1964 by J. Eells and J.H. Sampson.[1][2][3]

Mathematical definition

Given M, N and φ as above, and denoting by g and h the metrics on M and N, the energy of φ at a point is defined as .

In local coordinates, the right hand side of this equality reads .

If M is compact, define the total energy of the map φ as (where dvg denotes the measure on M induced by its metric).

Then φ is called a harmonic map if it is an critical point of this energy functional. This definition is extended to the case where M is not compact by asking the restriction of φ to every compact domain to be harmonic.

Alternatively, the map φ is harmonic if it satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equations associated to the functional E. These equations read , where is the connection on the vector bundle induced by the Levi-Civita connections on M and N.

Examples

  • When the source manifold M is R or S1, φ is a harmonic map if and only if it is a geodesic. (In this case, the rubber-and-marble analogy described above reduces to the usual elastic band analogy for geodesics.)
  • When the target manifold N is Rn (with its standard Euclidean metric), φ is a harmonic map if and only if it is a harmonic function in the usual sense (i.e. a solution of the Laplace equation). This follows from the Dirichlet principle.
  • Every minimal immersion is a harmonic map.
  • Every totally geodesic map is harmonic (in this case, itself vanishes, not just its trace).
  • Every holomorphic map between Kähler manifolds is harmonic.

Problems and applications

  • If, after applying the rubber M onto the marble N via some map φ, one "releases" it, it will try to "snap" into a position of least tension. This "physical" observation leads to the following mathematical problem: given a homotopy class of maps from M to N, does it contain a representative that is a harmonic map?
  • Existence results on harmonic maps between manifolds has consequences for their curvature.
  • Once existence is known, how can a harmonic map be constructed explicitly? (One fruitful method uses twistor theory.)
  • In theoretical physics, harmonic maps are also known as sigma models.

References

  1. ^ J. Eells and J.H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 109–160
  2. ^ J. Eells and L. Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps, Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 1–68
  3. ^ J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Another report on harmonic maps, Bull. London Math. Soc. 20 (1988), 385–524

External links