Harmonic map: Difference between revisions
m →External links: I think category:Harmonic analysis is relevant |
Reverting last edit (see discussion) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This functional ''E'' will be defined precisely below—one way of understanding it is to imagine that ''M'' is made of [[rubber]], ''N'' is made of [[marble]] (their shapes given by their respective [[Metric tensor|metrics]]), and the map ''φ'':M→N prescribes how one "applies" the rubber onto the marble: ''E''(''φ'') then represents the total amount of [[elastic potential energy]] resulting from tension in the rubber. In these terms, ''φ'' is a harmonic map if the rubber, when "released" but still constrained to stay everywhere in contact with the marble, already finds itself in a position of equilibrium and therefore does not "snap" into a different shape. |
This functional ''E'' will be defined precisely below—one way of understanding it is to imagine that ''M'' is made of [[rubber]], ''N'' is made of [[marble]] (their shapes given by their respective [[Metric tensor|metrics]]), and the map ''φ'':M→N prescribes how one "applies" the rubber onto the marble: ''E''(''φ'') then represents the total amount of [[elastic potential energy]] resulting from tension in the rubber. In these terms, ''φ'' is a harmonic map if the rubber, when "released" but still constrained to stay everywhere in contact with the marble, already finds itself in a position of equilibrium and therefore does not "snap" into a different shape. |
||
Harmonic maps were introduced in [[1964]] by J. Eells and J.H. Sampson.<ref>J. Eells |
Harmonic maps were introduced in [[1964]] by J. Eells and J.H. Sampson.<ref>J. Eells and J.H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, ''Amer. J. Math.'' '''86''' (1964), 109–160</ref><ref>J. Eells and L. Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps, ''Bull. London Math. Soc.'' '''10''' (1978), 1–68</ref><ref>J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Another report on harmonic maps, ''Bull. London Math. Soc.'' '''20''' (1988), 385–524</ref> |
||
== Mathematical definition == |
== Mathematical definition == |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
[[Category:Riemannian geometry]] |
[[Category:Riemannian geometry]] |
||
[[Category:Harmonic analysis]] |
Revision as of 08:06, 24 February 2007
A (smooth) map φ:M→N between Riemannian manifolds M and N is called harmonic if it is a critical point of the energy functional E(φ).
This functional E will be defined precisely below—one way of understanding it is to imagine that M is made of rubber, N is made of marble (their shapes given by their respective metrics), and the map φ:M→N prescribes how one "applies" the rubber onto the marble: E(φ) then represents the total amount of elastic potential energy resulting from tension in the rubber. In these terms, φ is a harmonic map if the rubber, when "released" but still constrained to stay everywhere in contact with the marble, already finds itself in a position of equilibrium and therefore does not "snap" into a different shape.
Harmonic maps were introduced in 1964 by J. Eells and J.H. Sampson.[1][2][3]
Mathematical definition
Given M, N and φ as above, and denoting by g and h the metrics on M and N, the energy of φ at a point is defined as .
In local coordinates, the right hand side of this equality reads .
If M is compact, define the total energy of the map φ as (where dvg denotes the measure on M induced by its metric).
Then φ is called a harmonic map if it is an critical point of this energy functional. This definition is extended to the case where M is not compact by asking the restriction of φ to every compact domain to be harmonic.
Alternatively, the map φ is harmonic if it satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equations associated to the functional E. These equations read , where is the connection on the vector bundle induced by the Levi-Civita connections on M and N.
Examples
- When the source manifold M is R or S1, φ is a harmonic map if and only if it is a geodesic. (In this case, the rubber-and-marble analogy described above reduces to the usual elastic band analogy for geodesics.)
- When the target manifold N is Rn (with its standard Euclidean metric), φ is a harmonic map if and only if it is a harmonic function in the usual sense (i.e. a solution of the Laplace equation). This follows from the Dirichlet principle.
- Every minimal immersion is a harmonic map.
- Every totally geodesic map is harmonic (in this case, itself vanishes, not just its trace).
- Every holomorphic map between Kähler manifolds is harmonic.
Problems and applications
- If, after applying the rubber M onto the marble N via some map φ, one "releases" it, it will try to "snap" into a position of least tension. This "physical" observation leads to the following mathematical problem: given a homotopy class of maps from M to N, does it contain a representative that is a harmonic map?
- Existence results on harmonic maps between manifolds has consequences for their curvature.
- Once existence is known, how can a harmonic map be constructed explicitly? (One fruitful method uses twistor theory.)
- In theoretical physics, harmonic maps are also known as sigma models.
References
- ^ J. Eells and J.H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 109–160
- ^ J. Eells and L. Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps, Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 1–68
- ^ J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Another report on harmonic maps, Bull. London Math. Soc. 20 (1988), 385–524