Template:NFL All-Pro Teams and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nevado del Ruiz/archive1: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
Bill shannon (talk | contribs) still editing |
done! yay |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Nevado del Ruiz]]=== |
|||
{{Navbox |
|||
|name = NFL All-Pro Teams |
|||
|title = [[All-Pro|NFL All-Pro Teams]] |
|||
|titlestyle = background:#FFEFD5; |
|||
|list1 = <small>{{nowrap begin}}[[1960 All-Pro Team|1960]]{{·wrap}} [[1961 All-Pro Team|1961]]{{·wrap}} [[1962 All-Pro Team|1962]]{{·wrap}} [[1963 All-Pro Team|1963]]{{·wrap}} [[1964 All-Pro Team|1964]]{{·wrap}} [[1965 All-Pro Team|1965]]{{·wrap}} [[1966 All-Pro Team|1966]]{{·wrap}} [[1967 All-Pro Team|1967]]{{·wrap}} [[1968 All-Pro Team|1968]]{{·wrap}} [[1969 All-Pro Team|1969]]{{·wrap}} [[1960 All-Pro Team|1960]]{{·wrap}} [[1971 All-Pro Team|1971]]{{·wrap}} [[1972 All-Pro Team|1972]]{{·wrap}} [[1973 All-Pro Team|1973]]{{·wrap}} [[1974 All-Pro Team|1974]]{{·wrap}} [[1975 All-Pro Team|1975]]{{·wrap}} [[1976 All-Pro Team|1976]]{{·wrap}} [[1977 All-Pro Team|1977]]{{·wrap}} [[1978 All-Pro Team|1978]]{{·wrap}} [[1979 All-Pro Team|1979]][[1980 All-Pro Team|1980]]{{·wrap}} [[1981 All-Pro Team|1981]]{{·wrap}} [[1982 All-Pro Team|1982]]{{·wrap}} [[1983 All-Pro Team|1983]]{{·wrap}} [[1984 All-Pro Team|1984]]{{·wrap}} [[1985 All-Pro Team|1985]]{{·wrap}} [[1986 All-Pro Team|1986]]{{·wrap}} [[1987 All-Pro Team|1987]]{{·wrap}} [[1988 All-Pro Team|1988]]{{·wrap}} [[1989 All-Pro Team|1989]][[1990 All-Pro Team|1990]]{{·wrap}} [[1991 All-Pro Team|1991]]{{·wrap}} [[1992 All-Pro Team|1992]]{{·wrap}} [[1993 All-Pro Team|1993]]{{·wrap}} [[1994 All-Pro Team|1994]]{{·wrap}} [[1995 All-Pro Team|1995]]{{·wrap}} [[1996 All-Pro Team|1996]]{{·wrap}} [[1997 All-Pro Team|1997]]{{·wrap}} [[1998 All-Pro Team|1998]]{{·wrap}} [[1999 All-Pro Team|1999]][[2000 All-Pro Team|2000]]{{·wrap}} [[2001 All-Pro Team|2001]]{{·wrap}} [[2002 All-Pro Team|2002]]{{·wrap}} [[2003 All-Pro Team|2003]]{{·wrap}} [[2004 All-Pro Team|2004]]{{·wrap}} [[2005 All-Pro Team|2005]]{{·wrap}} [[2006 All-Pro Team|2006]]{{·wrap}} [[2007 All-Pro Team|2007]]{{·wrap}} [[2008 All-Pro Team|2008]]{{·wrap}} [[2009 All-Pro Team|2009]]{{nowrap end}}</small> |
|||
:<small>''Nominator(s): —'''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Ceran</font >]]''' ([[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Strike!</font>]])''</small> |
|||
|belowstyle = background:#FFEFD5; |
|||
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Featured article tools|1=Nevado_del_Ruiz}}</noinclude> |
|||
|below = '''[[Pro Bowl]]{{•}} [[National Football League Most Valuable Player Award|NFL MVPs]]{{•}} [[National Football League Records]]''' |
|||
<!-- Please don't edit anything above here; just include your reasons for nominating below. --> |
|||
}}<noinclude> |
|||
[[hu:Sablon:Superbowl]] |
|||
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I've done my best to expand this article on a truly beautiful and dangerous volcano in Colombia. This stratovolcano caused the deadliest lahar in recorded history and killed some 28,000 people. Therefore, I'm donating this work to them. I've worked long and hard over this article, harder than I have on any other, and I think it's ready to be featured. —'''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Ceran</font >]]''' ([[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Strike!</font>]]) 00:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Super Bowl navigational boxes|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
|||
*'''Comment''' [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=nevado+del+ruiz&num=10&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=lang_en&as_src=&as_price=p1&as_scoring= 185 free English news sources for the volcano]. Are you sure it's comprehensive? ~<strong>'''<span style="font-family:Papyrus;color:DarkRed">one of many</span> <span style="color:#FF7F00;font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Editorofthewiki|editorofthewiki]]s <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki#top|<span style="color:Green;">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color:Green;">contribs</span>]]/[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color:Green;">editor review</span>]])</sup>'''</span></strong>~ 00:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
</noinclude> |
|||
*:Yes, they all talk about the eruption. I was not missing any info about the eruption, but the scientific aspect of the volcano. News sources don't make an article comprehensive, nevermind sources at all. Comprehensiveness is how the article reads. —'''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Ceran</font >]]''' ([[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">[speak]</font>]]) 00:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*:: More importantly, [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22nevado+del+ruiz%22&hl=en&lr= 1500 scholarly sources] from scholar.google.com. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*:i've reviewed at least 300 of them, and based on my review the ones I have were as far as I got without info repeats or unecessary information. —'''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Ceran</font >]]''' [[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">[speak]</font>]] 01:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*:::(ec) Unless this is an article in which there is ''an incredibly large amount'' of information available, we assume that you include pretty much everything except some amazingly trivial points. You see what I am doing to [[1964 Gabon coup d'etat]], and that is much less known than NdR. Come on -- there must me more available than 20kbs on a very famous volcano! Also, I don't see the logic in how news sources do not make an article comprehensive. They can be used to make it so. ~<strong>'''<span style="font-family:Papyrus;color:DarkRed">one of many</span> <span style="color:#FF7F00;font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Editorofthewiki|editorofthewiki]]s <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki#top|<span style="color:Green;">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color:Green;">contribs</span>]]/[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color:Green;">editor review</span>]])</sup>'''</span></strong>~ 01:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*::::[http://books.google.com/books?as_q=Nevado+del+Ruiz&num=10&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_brr=0&lr=&as_vt=Nevado+del+Ruiz&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_sub=&as_drrb=c&as_miny=&as_maxy=&as_isbn= 26 books with "Nevado del Ruiz" in the title]. I suggest withdrawal. ~<strong>'''<span style="font-family:Papyrus;color:DarkRed">one of many</span> <span style="color:#FF7F00;font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Editorofthewiki|editorofthewiki]]s <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki#top|<span style="color:Green;">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color:Green;">contribs</span>]]/[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color:Green;">editor review</span>]])</sup>'''</span></strong>~ 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Consider it done. And you know what? I've grown steadily and steadily more bored of this MMORPG. I can't sleep as well, I spend a ton of time on the computer, I don't have any fun anymore. This place is just ruining my life, and I'm sadly feeling on the verge of extinction. Tipping over... —'''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">Ceran</font >]]''' [[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#000000">[speak]</font>]] 01:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:28, 12 October 2008
Nevado del Ruiz
| Toolbox |
|---|
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I've done my best to expand this article on a truly beautiful and dangerous volcano in Colombia. This stratovolcano caused the deadliest lahar in recorded history and killed some 28,000 people. Therefore, I'm donating this work to them. I've worked long and hard over this article, harder than I have on any other, and I think it's ready to be featured. —Ceran (Strike!) 00:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment 185 free English news sources for the volcano. Are you sure it's comprehensive? ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 00:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, they all talk about the eruption. I was not missing any info about the eruption, but the scientific aspect of the volcano. News sources don't make an article comprehensive, nevermind sources at all. Comprehensiveness is how the article reads. —Ceran ([speak]) 00:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- More importantly, 1500 scholarly sources from scholar.google.com. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- i've reviewed at least 300 of them, and based on my review the ones I have were as far as I got without info repeats or unecessary information. —Ceran [speak] 01:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- (ec) Unless this is an article in which there is an incredibly large amount of information available, we assume that you include pretty much everything except some amazingly trivial points. You see what I am doing to 1964 Gabon coup d'etat, and that is much less known than NdR. Come on -- there must me more available than 20kbs on a very famous volcano! Also, I don't see the logic in how news sources do not make an article comprehensive. They can be used to make it so. ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 01:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- 26 books with "Nevado del Ruiz" in the title. I suggest withdrawal. ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Consider it done. And you know what? I've grown steadily and steadily more bored of this MMORPG. I can't sleep as well, I spend a ton of time on the computer, I don't have any fun anymore. This place is just ruining my life, and I'm sadly feeling on the verge of extinction. Tipping over... —Ceran [speak] 01:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- 26 books with "Nevado del Ruiz" in the title. I suggest withdrawal. ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- (ec) Unless this is an article in which there is an incredibly large amount of information available, we assume that you include pretty much everything except some amazingly trivial points. You see what I am doing to 1964 Gabon coup d'etat, and that is much less known than NdR. Come on -- there must me more available than 20kbs on a very famous volcano! Also, I don't see the logic in how news sources do not make an article comprehensive. They can be used to make it so. ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 01:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, they all talk about the eruption. I was not missing any info about the eruption, but the scientific aspect of the volcano. News sources don't make an article comprehensive, nevermind sources at all. Comprehensiveness is how the article reads. —Ceran ([speak]) 00:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)